Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:03:19.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diet of harbour seals at Mousa, Shetland, during the third quarter of 1994

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2009

E.G. Brown  and
G.J. Pierce
E.G. Brown
Affiliation:
9 Twageos Road, Lerwick, Shetland, ZE1 OBB.
G.J. Pierce
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, Deptartment of Zoology, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB9 2TN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scats (N=200) of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) were collected from haul-out sites on the Island of Mousa, south-east Shetland, during July, August and September 1994. A total of 5,531 fish otoliths were identified in scats and measured to reconstruct fish lengths and weight. Gadid fishes dominated the diet of harbour seals on Mousa during the study period, both in terms of weight and the frequency with which they occurred. There was evidence for the existence of temporal trends. Over the period July–September the importance of gadids in the diet increased while that of sandeels declined. These temporal trends are probably associated with changes in prey availability. Comparisons of the size of sandeels, herring and whiting eaten by seals with trawl catches suggest that seals were probably not size-selective, but a corollary of this is that, while otolith size is reduced during passage through seal guts, application of correction factors derived from captive feeding experiments led to over-estimates of fish size.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , May 1997 , pp. 539 - 555
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon., 1995. Scottish Sea Fisheries statistical tables 1994. Scottish Office Agriculture & Fisheries Department.Google Scholar
Bedford, B.C., Woolner, L.E. & Jones, B.W., 1986. Length-weight relationships for commercial fish species and conversion factors for various presentations. Fisheries Data Report. MAFF. Lowestoft, 10.Google Scholar
Bonner, W.N., Vaughan, R.W., & Johnston L., 1973. The status of common seals in Shetland. Biological Conservation, 5, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, P.R., Pierce, G.J. & Diack, J.S.W., 1990. Sources of evidence for salmon in the diet of seals. Fisheries Research, 10, 137–150.Google Scholar
Brown, E.G., 1995. Survey and review of data on grey seal populations in Shetland. Report. Scottish Natural Heritage. [Contract no. NE/S/32/94.]Google Scholar
Clarke, M.R., 1962. The identification of cephalopod ‘beaks’ and the relationship between beak size and total body weight. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Zoology), 8, 421–480.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.R., ed., 1986. A handbook for the identification of cephalopod beaks. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coull, K.A., Jermyn, A.S., Newton, A.W., Henderson, G.I. & Hall, W.B., 1989. Length-weight relationships for 88 species of fish encountered in the North East Atlantic. Scottish Fisheries Research Report, no. 43.Google Scholar
Dellinger, T. & Trillmich, F., 1988. Estimating diet composition from scat analysis in otariid seals (Otariidae): is it reliable? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66, 1865–1870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck, C.D., Hall, A.J. & Ingram, S., 1993. Impact of the Braer oil spill: common seal aerial survey. Report. Ecological Steering Group on the Oil Spill in Shetland.Google Scholar
Gauld, J.A., 1990. Movements of lesser sandeels (Ammodytes marinus Raitt) tagged in the northwestern North Sea. Journal du Conseil, 46, 229–231.Google Scholar
Hammond, P.S., Hall, A.J. & Prime, J.H., 1994a. The diet of grey seals around Orkney and other island and mainland sites in north-eastern Scotland. journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 340–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, P.S., Hall, A.J. & Prime, J.H., 1994b. The diet of grey seals in the Inner and Outer Hebrides. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 737–746.Google Scholar
Hammond, P.S. & Rotheray, P., 1996. Application of computer sampling in the estimation of seal diet. Journal of Applied Statistics, 23, 525–533.Google Scholar
Härkönen, T., 1986. Guide to the otoliths of the bony fishes of the northeast Atlantic. Hellerup: Danbiu ApS. [Biological Consultants.]Google Scholar
Harvey, J.T., 1989. Assessment of errors associated with harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) faecal sampling. Journal of Zoology, 219, 101–111.Google Scholar
Harvey, J.T. & Antonelis, G.A., 1994. Biases associated with non-lethal methods of determining the diet of northern elephant seals. Marine Mammal Science, 10, 178–187.Google Scholar
Hiby, L., Duck, C.D. & Thompson, D., 1993. Seal stocks in Great Britain: surveys conducted in 1991. Natural Environment Research Council News, January 1993, p. 31.Google Scholar
Hopkins, P.J., 1986. Exploited fish and shellfish species in the Moray Firth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh B, 91, 57–72.Google Scholar
Jobling, M. & Breiby, A., 1986. The use and abuse of fish otoliths in studies of the feeding habits of marine piscivores. Sarsia, 71, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobling, M., 1987. Marine mammal faeces samples as indicators of prey importance - a source of error in bioenergetics studies. Sarsia, 72, 255–260.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H., Nolet, B. & French, D., 1988. Fluctuations in numbers and activity of inshore demersal fishes in Shetland. journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 68, 601–617.Google Scholar
Mason, J., Newton, A.W., McKay, D.W. & Kinnear, J.A.M., 1985. Fisheries in the Orkney area. Proceedings of the Royal Society Edinburgh B, 87, 65–81.Google Scholar
Pierce, G.J. & Boyle, P.R., 1991. A review of methods for diet analysis in piscivorous marine mammals. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review. London, 29, 409–486.Google Scholar
Pierce, G.J., Boyle, P.R. & Diack, J.S.W., 1991. Identification of fish bones in faeces and digestive tracts of seals. journal of Zoology, 224, 320–328.Google Scholar
Pierce, G.J., Boyle, P.R. & Thompson, P.M., 1990. Diet selection by seals. In Trophic relationships in the marine environment. Proceedings of the 24th European Marine Biology Symposium (ed. Barnes, M. and Gibson, R.N.), pp. 222–238. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, G.J., Boyle, P.R., Watt, J. & Grisley, M., 1993. Recent advances in diet analysis of marine mammals. Symposium Zoological Society, 66, 241–261.Google Scholar
Prime, J.H., 1979. Observation on the digestion of some gadoid fish otoliths by a young common seal. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports), N: 14.Google Scholar
Prime, J.H. & Hammond, P.S., 1990. The diet of grey seals from the south-western North Sea assessed from analysis of hard parts found in faeces. Journal of Applied Ecology, 27, 435–447.Google Scholar
Rae, B.B., 1968. The food of seals in Scottish waters. Marine Research. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, no 2.Google Scholar
SMRU, 1984. Interactions between grey seals and UK fisheries. Report on research conducted for the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland by the National Environmental Research Council's Sea Mammal Research Unit.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.M., Fedak, M.A., McConnell, B.J. & Nicholas, K.S., 1989. Seasonal and sex-related variation in the activity patterns of common seals (Phoca vitulina). journal of Applied Ecology, 26, 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P.M. & Miller, D., 1990. Summer foraging activity and movements of radio-tagged common seals (Phoca vitulina L.) in the Moray Firth, Scotland. journal of Applied Ecology, 27, 492–501.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.M., Miller, D., Cooper, R. & Hammond, P.S., 1994. Changes in the distribution and activity of female harbour seals during the breeding season: implications for their lactation strategy and mating patterns. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 24–30.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.M., Pierce, G.J., Hislop, J.R.G., Miller, D. & Diack, J.S.W., 1991. Winter foraging by common seals (Phoca vitulina) in relation to food availability in the Inner Moray Firth N.E., Scotland. Journal of Animal Ecology, 60, 283–294.Google Scholar
Ticknell, W.L.N., 1970. The exploitation and status of the common seal (Phoca vitulina) in Shetland. Biological Conservation, 2, 179–184.Google Scholar
Tollit, D.J., Foome, M.A., Hall, A.J. & Donovan, T., 1994. Assessment of errors associated with current estimates of the diet composition of common seals. In The behaviour and ecology of common and grey seals in the Moray Firth (ed. Thompson, P.M. et al. ). Aberdeen: Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen. [Report to the Scottish Office Agriculture and Fisheries Department.]Google Scholar
Tollit, D.J., Steward, M., Thompson, P.M., Pierce, G.J., Santos, M.B. & Hughes, S., in press. Species and size differences in the digestion of otoliths and beaks; implications for estimates of pinniped diet composition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.Google Scholar
Treacy, S.D. & Crawford, T.W., 1981. Retrieval of otoliths and statoliths from gastrointestinal contents and scats of marine mammals. Journal of Wildlife Management, 45, 990–993.Google Scholar
Wright, P.J. & Bailey, M.C., 1993. The biology of sandeels in the vicinity of sea bird colonies in Shetland. Scottish Fisheries Research Report, no. 15.Google Scholar