The presence of excessive mirror overflow in children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is discussed in numerous published reports. These reports, however, include a limited age range in their samples. The objective of this study is to examine the effects of diagnosis and sex on mirror overflow and standard deviation (SD) of tap time in children with and without ADHD across a larger age range (5–12 years) of children.

One-hundred and forty-eight children with ADHD and 112 age- and sex-matched typically developing (TD) children completed a finger sequencing task. Mirror overflow, SD of tap time, and mean tap time were measured using finger twitch transducers.

Results reveal a significant diagnostic effect on mirror overflow such that boys and girls with ADHD demonstrate increased overflow compared to same-sex TD children. Boys with ADHD demonstrated more variable tap times compared to TD boys; no diagnostic effect was observed in the girls.

Boys with ADHD exhibit anomalous motor variability; girls with ADHD show similar levels of variability as TD girls. Boys and girls with ADHD exhibit similar levels of excessive mirror overflow. This lack of sex differences on mirror overflow is distinct from reports finding sex effects on overflow and could result from an examination of a broader age range than is included in prior reports. Adolescent data would provide a greater understanding of the trajectory of anomalous mirror overflow across development. Examination of functional and structural connectivity would expand the current understanding of the neurobiological foundation of motor overflow.

An effective support system for families with children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) consists of multiple methods of educational and therapeutic delivery. Such methods are adapted to meet a family’s needs and needs of the time, like the COVID-19 pandemic. Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) are established by schools to support success in academics for children with ASD. IEPs can vary depending on the district and accessibility, thus, the effective implementation and communication between this support system is important for its success. The current case study examines academic and therapeutic outcomes of an IEP implementation during hybrid learning of a child with ASD and their family.

Purposeful sampling identified a participant from a previous IRB approved study through the UNLV Educational Psychology program that interviewed parents on their remote learning experience. A qualitative case study was applied to further investigate student outcomes. Parent interview and the child’s progress report were coded and analyzed systematically. The identified family included correspondence from the mother (Lisa, 37) and her son (Noah, 9). Noah attended third grade at a Charter School and was diagnosed with ASD in 2019. His IEP included 80% in General Education (online) with Special Education assistance (in person; reading, writing, and mathematics) and Occupational (OT), Speech/Language (SLP), and Physical Therapy (PT) (hybrid).

Noah began hybrid learning in October 2020, with in-person learning two days a week and remote learning everyday for two to three hours each day. Progress report and interview were collected in April 2021 at the halfway point of his IEP implementation which described Noah’s current special education and therapy services goals/outcomes in March 2021. This included 11 goals that were observed and assessed in OT (2), PT(2), Reading (2), Writing (1), Math (2), and SLP (2). Noah progressed in 9 of 11 goals, with 1 being met and 8 classified as satisfactory by displaying some improvement in respective skills mid year. The remaining OT (2) goals showed no definitive conclusion. Lisa mentioned that lack of direct observation of particular skills and too many online classes to attend led to inconclusive outcomes. Lisa and Noah came across difficulties while engaging in OT online sessions encountering emotional stress when adjusting to the mode of delivery. Lisa expressed positive emotions when referring to the support system and described it as collaborative with adequate attention to multiple aspects of his development. She voiced understanding of her’s and other professionals’ role and the extent of their abilities in the context of the pandemic.

Of the 11 IEP goals, there was adequate progress for the child amid hybrid learning. The parent preferred that OT be delivered in person as certain procedures require direct contact and affected outcomes. Hybrid learning has allowed for parents to directly access their children’s endeavors and heighten communication with professionals. This suggests that maintenance of IEP standards can be satisfactory in a hybrid learning model with adequate monitoring from parents and treatment teams for children with ASD.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder commonly associated with relative impairments on processing speed, working memory, and/or executive functioning. Anxiety commonly co-occurs with ADHD and may also adversely affect these cognitive functions. Additionally, language status (i.e., monolingualism vs bilingualism) has been shown to affect select cognitive domains across an individual’s lifespan. Yet, few studies have examined the potential effects of the interaction between anxiety and language status on various cognitive domains among people with ADHD. Thus, the current study investigated the effects of the interaction of anxiety and language status on processing speed, working memory, and executive functioning among monolingual and bilingual individuals with ADHD.

The sample comprised of 407 consecutive adult patients diagnosed with ADHD. When asked about their language status, 67% reported to be monolingual (English). The Mean age of individuals was 27.93 (SD = 6.83), mean education of 15.8 years (SD = 2.10), 60% female, racially diverse with 49% Non-Hispanic White, 22% Non-Hispanic Black, 13% Hispanic/Latinx, 9% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 6% other race/ethnicity. Processing speed, working memory, and executive function were measured via the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition Processing Speed Index, Working Memory Index, and Trail Making Test B, respectively. Anxiety was measured via the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Three separate linear regression models examined the interaction between anxiety (moderator) and cognition (processing speed, working memory, and executive function) on language. Models included sex/gender and education as covariates with Processing Speed Index and Working Memory Index as the outcomes. Age, sex/gender, and education were used as covariates when Trail Making Test B was the outcome.

Monolingual and bilingual patients differed in mean age (p < .05) but did not differ in level of anxiety, education, or sex/gender. Overall, anxiety was not associated with processing speed, working memory, and executive function. However, the interaction between anxiety and language status was significantly associated with processing speed (ß = -0.37, p < .05), and executive functioning (ß = 0.82, p < .05). No associations were found when anxiety was added as a moderator for the associations between language and working memory.

This study found that anxiety moderated the relationship between language status and select cognitive domains (i.e., processing speed and executive functioning) among individuals with ADHD. Specifically, anxiety had a greater association on processing speed and executive functioning performance for bilinguals rather than monolinguals. Future detailed studies are needed to better understand how anxiety modifies the relationship between language and cognitive performance outcomes over time amongst a linguistically diverse sample.

On continuous recognition tasks, changing the context objects are embedded in impairs memory. Older adults are worse on pattern separation tasks requiring identification of similar objects compared to younger adults. However, how contexts impact pattern separation in aging is unclear. The apolipoprotein (APOE) ϵ4 allele may exacerbate possible age-related changes due to early, elevated neuropathology. The goal of this study is to determine how context and APOE status affect pattern separation among younger and older adults.

Older and younger ϵ4 carriers and noncarriers were given a continuous object recognition task. Participants indicated if objects on a Repeated White background, Repeated Scene, or a Novel Scene were old, similar, or new. The proportions of correct responses and the types of errors made were calculated.

Novel scenes lowered recognition scores compared to all other contexts for everyone. Younger adults outperformed older adults on identifying similar objects. Older adults misidentified similar objects as old more than new, and the repeated scene exacerbated this error. APOE status interacted with scene and age such that in repeated scenes, younger carriers produced less false alarms, and this trend switched for older adults where carriers made more false alarms.

Context impacted recognition memory in the same way for both age groups. Older adults underutilized details and over relied on holistic information during pattern separation compared to younger adults. The triple interaction in false alarms may indicate an even greater reliance on holistic information among older adults with increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease.

Loss of empathy is a hallmark feature of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Change in socioemotional functioning identified by others is often the primary initial presenting concern in this disorder, in contrast to more subtle early cognitive changes and limited patient insight. The present study examined the predictive utility of an empathy informant-report measure for discriminating clinician-diagnosed bvFTD from other dementia syndromes.

Data from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) database were used to study individuals with bvFTD (n = 406) and other dementia syndromes (n = 385). Participants were administered neuropsychological measures and collateral informants completed an informant-report of empathy.

Informants reported that patients with bvFTD demonstrated significantly lower levels of empathic concern [F(1, 789) = 120.91, p < .001, η 2 = 0.13] and perspective taking [F(1, 789) = 153.08, p < .001, η 2 = 0.16] than patients with other dementia syndromes. These differences were not attributable to the level of global cognitive impairment. Empathy scores were not significantly associated with any neurocognitive measure when controlling for age. ROC curve analyses showed fair to good clinical utility of the informant-report empathy measure for distinguishing bvFTD from non-bvFTD, whereas a traditional measure of executive functioning failed to differentiate the groups.

These findings indicate that informant ratings of empathy offer a unique source of clinical information that may be useful in detecting neurobehavioral changes specific to bvFTD before a clear neurocognitive pattern emerges on testing.

COVID-19 caused a worldwide restructuring of daily life, necessitating a sharp increase in social distancing, telecommunication, and adherence to rapidly changing public health recommendations. Coping, a response to stressors, is a protective mechanism to increase resiliency against uncertainty and decreased social connectedness. This disruption of daily life has prompted unanticipated and unique research opportunities and allowed researchers to consider whether individuals' primary coping style with the pandemic is associated with cognition. Previous research has found that problem coping, or action-oriented approaches to a stressor, is the most adaptive coping strategy. Emotion-based coping, like venting or humor, varies and depends on the stressor. Avoidant coping, like denial or ignoring the stressor, is generally considered maladaptive (Carver, 1977), which may lead to increased psychosocial disturbance. Executive functioning, responsible for planning, organizing, inhibition, and self-management are theorized to be most impacted by the social and psychological effects of COVID-19 (Pollizi et al., 2021). While some research has examined this question in working parent and older adult populations, we seek to understand this relationship in emerging adults, whose frontal lobes, responsible for executive functioning, are still developing. The present study seeks to examine the association between coping with the COVID-19 pandemic and executive functioning.

College students (N=440; M=19.30 years old, SD=1.42, 76% female) across seven US universities completed self-report questionnaires on SONA, which included Barkley's Deficits in Executive Functioning, Short Form (BDEFS-SF; Barkley, 2011) and the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory adapted for coping with the COVID-19 pandemic (Brief COPE; Carver 1989). Items on the BDEFS-SF were summed to create a global executive functioning score. Items on the Brief COPE were combined to create three factors: emotional,, avoidant,, and problem-focused (Dias et al., 2011).

Stepwise linear regression was used to assess whether coping style predicted executive functioning. Results indicate that the use of emotional coping (ß =0.19, p< .001) and avoidant coping (ß =0.33, p< .001) predicted higher scores on the BDEFS (greater deficits in executive functioning). Additionally, the use of problem coping (ß =-0.27, p< .001) predicted lower BDEFS scores (better executive functioning), with this overall model explaining 16.37% of the variance.

Results from this study confirm that COVID-19 coping styles are associated with decreased executive functioning. Specifically, emotional coping and avoidant coping predicted decreased executive functioning, which has been supported in non-pandemic samples. The use of problem-focused coping predicted increased executive functioning, indicating that this may be a protective form of coping with the pandemic. Because tasks necessary for daily life, such as planning, organizing, and judgment, rely on executive functioning, maladaptive coping with COVID-19 may impede college students' daily functioning necessary for successful engagement in schoolwork, emotion regulation, and activities of daily living. This research begins to address the gap in knowledge regarding the relationship between coping with the COVID-19 pandemic and executive functioning. This knowledge can be used in future crises in order to promote the use of problem-focused coping and mitigate the self-observed deficits in executive functioning demonstrated in this population.

Exposure to toxic chemicals during early brain development increases the risk of neurodevelopmental problems in children. Parents' and prospective parents' understanding of the impact of toxic chemicals on brain development and the efficacy of translation tools for children's environmental health literacy are poorly understood. We developed and validated a questionnaire, PRevention of Toxic chemicals in the Environment for Children Tool (PRoTECT) to assess knowledge of toxic chemicals and neurodevelopment, intentions to reduce exposures to toxic chemicals, and preferences for actions by government and industry to prevent neurodevelopmental disorders. Using PRoTECT, we surveyed people of child-bearing age across five countries (Canada, United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), India, and Australia) to identify general patterns of responses on this questionnaire by demographic characteristics, including country, age, gender, parental status, pregnancy status, and education. We also employed a randomized control design to examine the efficacy of a knowledge translation video to instill knowledge and prompt behavioral changes to reduce exposures to toxic chemicals immediately following its presentation and after a six-week follow-up period.

We recruited 15,594 participants, ages 18 to 45, via CloudResearch's Prime Panels between October-December 2021. After completing the PRoTECT survey, participants were randomly assigned to watch the video Little Things Matter: Impact of Toxic Chemicals on Brain Development (i.e., the experimental group) or to serve as the control group. Next, both groups answered a series of questions to assess their knowledge of toxic chemicals, their intentions to reduce exposures to toxic chemicals, and barriers to changing their behaviours. After six-weeks, we recontacted a subset (N=4,842) of participants to repeat PRoTECT and answer the same series of behavioural questions assessing whether they modified any of their behaviours to reduce exposure and why or why not.

Most participants (i.e., 75-85%) agreed that toxic chemicals can impact brain development and endorsed preferences (∼85%) for allocating more resources to prevent neurodevelopmental disorders, especially people with higher education, parents and pregnant women, and people who lived in India. Despite this, a large proportion of participants (∼50%) trusted industry and believed that government effectively regulated toxic chemicals. After the six-week follow-up, experimental participants showed greater changes in scores on PRoTECT (i.e., between 5-15% change), indicating greater knowledge about harms posed by toxic chemicals, more intentions to reduce exposure, and stronger preferences for prevention as compared to the control group. Differences were larger among people from the US, those who were more highly educated, and people in their thirties. However, the differences between groups in making behavioural changes to reduce exposures were attenuated at the six-week follow up as compared to baseline. Significant barriers to reduce exposure to toxic chemicals were reported by both groups and included cost, inconvenience, and not knowing how to determine whether a product is non-toxic or where to purchase non-toxic products.

We observed greater knowledge and concerns about toxic chemicals among more affluent respondents, pregnant women and parents, and people living in India across both groups. While the video enhanced participants' knowledge about toxic chemicals and intentions to reduce exposure, they indicated that barriers hindered them from making behavioral changes.

Previous findings suggest that time setting errors (TSEs) in the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) may be related mainly to impairments in semantic and executive function. Recent attempts to dissociate the classic stimulus-bound error (setting the time to “10 to 11” instead of “10 past 11”) from other TSEs, did not support hypotheses regarding this error being primarily executive in nature or different from other time setting errors in terms of neurocognitive correlates. This study aimed to further investigate the cognitive correlates of stimulus-bound errors and other TSEs, in order to trace possible underlying cognitive deficits.

We examined cognitive test performance of participants with preliminary diagnoses associated with mild cognitive impairment. Among 490 participants, we identified clocks with stimulus-bound errors (n = 78), other TSEs (n = 41), other errors not related to time settings (n = 176), or errorless clocks (n = 195).

No differences were found on any dependent measure between the stimulus-bound and the other TSErs groups. Group comparisons suggested TSEs in general, to be associated with lower performance on various cognitive measures, especially on semantic and working memory measures. Regression analysis further highlighted semantic and verbal working memory difficulties as being the most prominent deficits associated with these errors.

TSEs in the CDT may indicate underlying deficits in semantic function and working memory. In addition, results support previous findings related to the diagnostic value of TSEs in detecting cognitive impairment.

Self- and informant-ratings of functional abilities are used to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and are commonly measured in clinical trials. Ratings are assumed to be accurate, yet they are subject to biases. Biases in self-ratings have been found in individuals with dementia who are older and more depressed and in caregivers with higher distress, burden, and education. This study aimed to extend prior findings using an objective approach to identify determinants of bias in ratings.

Participants were 118 individuals with MCI and their informants. Three discrepancy variables were generated including the discrepancies between (1) self- and informant-rated functional status, (2) informant-rated functional status and objective cognition (in those with MCI), and (3) self-rated functional status and objective cognition. These variables served as dependent variables in forward linear regression models, with demographics, stress, burden, depression, and self-efficacy as predictors.

Informants with higher stress rated individuals with MCI as having worse functional abilities relative to objective cognition. Individuals with MCI with worse self-efficacy rated their functional abilities as being worse compared to objective cognition. Informant-ratings were worse than self-ratings for informants with higher stress and individuals with MCI with higher self-efficacy.

This study highlights biases in subjective ratings of functional abilities in MCI. The risk for relative underreporting of functional abilities by individuals with higher stress levels aligns with previous research. Bias in individuals with MCI with higher self-efficacy may be due to anosognosia. Findings have implications for the use of subjective ratings for diagnostic purposes and as outcome measures.

Valid estimates of premorbid cognitive functioning (PMIQ) are crucial for the assessment of older adults at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. We investigated the relationship between the NIH Toolbox-Cognition Battery’s (NIHTB-CB) Oral Reading Recognition (ORR) subtest and Wechsler Test of Adult Reading scores (WTAR, convergent validity). We also compared ORR to NIHTB-CB Flanker scores, where null relationships were expected (discriminant validity).

The WTAR and NIHTB-CB were administered to 130 cognitively normal (CN) and 113 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Participants were community-dwelling, older Black and White adults, ages 55–88 years. Data analysis used uncorrected standard scores and Bayesian bivariate correlations. Supplemental materials include intraclass correlations.

ORR and WTAR scores were strongly positively associated, while ORR and Flanker scores were unrelated. This pattern held when restricting analyses to the two cognitive status groups, the two racial groups, and the four race-by-diagnosis subgroups.

The findings demonstrate convergent and discriminant validity and support NIHTB-CB ORR scores as valid estimates of scores on a PMIQ measure in older Black and White adults with and without MCI.

To examine the impact of early traumatic brain injury (TBI) on effortful control (EC) over time and the relationship of EC and executive functioning (EF) to long-term functional and social outcomes.

Parents of children (N = 206, ages 3–7) with moderate-to-severe TBI or orthopedic injuries (OIs) rated EC using the Child Behavior Questionnaire at 1 (pre-injury), 6, 12, and 18 months post-injury. Child functioning and social competence were assessed at 7 years post-injury. Mixed models examined the effects of injury, time since injury, and their interaction on EC. General linear models examined the associations of pre-injury EC and EC at 18 months with long-term functional and social outcomes. Models controlled for EF to assess the unique contribution of EC to outcomes.

Children with severe TBI had significantly lower EC than both the OI and moderate TBI groups at each post-injury time point. Both pre-injury and 18-month EC were associated with long-term outcomes. Among those with low EC at baseline, children with moderate and severe TBI had more functional impairment than those with OI; however, no group differences were noted at high levels of EC. EC had main effects on parent-reported social competence that did not vary by injury type.

Findings suggest that EC is sensitive to TBI effects and is a unique predictor of functional outcomes, independent of EF. High EC could serve as a protective factor, and as such measures of EC could be used to identify children for more intensive intervention.