Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:33:13.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reading lexically without semantics: Evidence from patients with probable Alzheimer's disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

Anastasia M. Raymer  and
Rita Sloan Berndt
Anastasia M. Raymer
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Maryland Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland
Rita Sloan Berndt
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Maryland Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent modifications of the lexical model of oral reading make the prediction that under conditions where sublexical reading processes alone cannot achieve the target pronunciation (i.e., when words have exceptional spellings or when sublexical processes are impaired), patients with severe semantic impairment should have more difficulty reading aloud semantically impaired words than semantically retained words. In a battery of lexical-semantic and reading tasks, two neurologically normal control subjects and two subjects with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) and only moderate semantic impairment read aloud all words accurately. One AD subject with severe semantic impairment was impaired in word reading but demonstrated no difference in reading words with regular and exceptional spellings. Another AD subject with severe semantic impairment read aloud without error virtually all regular and exception words. Neither severely impaired AD subject demonstrated any relationship between oral reading accuracy and semantic knowledge of exception words. These findings support a model of word reading incorporating lexical, nonsemantic processes by which lexical orthographic input representations directly activate lexical phonological output representations without the necessity of semantic mediation. (JINS, 1996, 2, 340–349.)

Keywords

Oral readingAcquired dyslexiaDementia
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , July 1996 , pp. 340 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beauvois, M.-F. & Derouesne, J. (1979). Phonological alexia: Three dissociations. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 42, 1115–1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, R.S., Reggia, J.A., & Mitchum, C.C. (1987). Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, R.S., Haendiges, A.N., Wayland, S., & Mitchum, C.C. (in preparation).Google Scholar
Bub, D., Cancelliere, A., & Kertesz, A. (1985). Whole-word and analytic translation of spelling to sound in a non-semantic reader. In Patterson, K.E., Marshall, J.C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 15–34). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.Google Scholar
Chiacchio, L., Grossi, D., Stanzione, M., & Trojano, L. (1992). Slowly progressive aphasia associated with surface dyslexia. Cortex, 28, 145–152.Google Scholar
Cipolotti, L. & Warrington, E.K. (1995). Semantic memory and reading abilities: A case report. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 104–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coltheart, M. (1985). Cognitive neuropsychology and the study of reading. In Posner, M.I. & Marin, O.S.M. (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 3–37). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Coslett, H.B. (1991). Read but not write “idea”: Evidence for a third reading mechanism. Brain and Language, 40, 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, W.N. & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Fromm, D., Holland, A.L., Nebes, R.B., & Oakley, M.A. (1991). A longitudinal study of word-reading ability in Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from the National Adult Reading Test. Cortex, 27, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funnell, E. (1983). Phonological processes in reading: New evidence from acquired dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, K.S., Hodges, J.R., & Patterson, K. (1994). The relationship between comprehension and oral reading in progressive fluent aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 32, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, A.E. & Caramazza, A. (1991). Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for output: Evidence from a category specific semantic deficit. Brain and Language, 40, 106–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, A.E., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 191–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremin, H. (1986). Spared naming without comprehension. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J.C. & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2 175–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattis, S. (1988). DRS: Dementia Rating Scale. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
McCarthy, R. & Warrington, E.K. (1986). Phonological reading: Phenomena and paradoxes. Cortex, 22, 359–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miceli, G., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1994). The interaction of lexical and sublexical processes in reading, writing and repetition. Neuropsychologia, 32, 317–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miceli, G., Giustolisi, L., & Caramazza, A. (1991). The interaction of lexical and non-lexical processing mechanisms: Evidence from anomia. Cortex, 27, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchum, C.C., Ritgert, B.A., Sandson, J., & Berndt, R.S. (1990). The use of response analysis in confrontation naming. Aphasiology, 4, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. & Patterson, K.E. (1980). A new attempt at an interpretationo, an attempt at a new interpretation. In Coltheart, M., Patterson, K.E., & Marshall, J.C. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 91–118). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Patterson, K., Graham, N., & Hodges, J.R. (1994). Reading in dementia of the Alzheimer type: A preserved ability? Neuropsychology, 8, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, K. & Hodges, J.R. (1992). Deterioration of word meaning: Implications for reading. Neuropsychologia, 30, 1025–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, K., Marshall, J.C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.) (1985). Surface dyslexia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.Google Scholar
Posner, M.I. & Snyder, C.R.R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In Solso, R. (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Masterson, J., & Job, R. (1987). Direct-route reading and the locus of lexical decision. In Coltheart, M., Sartori, G., & Job, R. (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language (pp. 59–77). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M.F., Saffran, E.M., & Marin, O.S.M. (1980). Fractionating the reading process in dementia: Evidence for wordspecific print-to-sound associations. In Coltheart, M., Patterson, K.E., & Marshall, J.C. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 259–269). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shallice, T. & McCarthy, R. (1985). Phonological reading: From patterns of impairment to possible procedures. In Patterson, K., Marshall, J.C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 361–397). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. & Warrington, E.K. (1980). Single and multiple component central dyslexic syndromes. In Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J.C. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 119–145). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T., Warrington, E.K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 111–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrington, E.K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 635–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed