8 Self-Reported versus Performance-Based Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Older Women with Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract

Objective:

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive scale (FACT-Cog) is one of the most frequently used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) and of CRCI-related impact on quality of life (QOL). Previous studies using the FACT-Cog found that >75% of women with breast cancer (BCa) experience CRCI. Distress tolerance (DT) is a complex construct that encompasses both the perceived capacity (i.e., cognitive appraisal) and the behavioral act of withstanding uncomfortable/aversive/negative emotional or physical experiences. Low DT is associated with psychopathology and executive dysfunction. We previously found that women with BCa with better DT skills reported less CRCI on the FACT-Cog. However, this relationship has not been tested using a performance-based cognitive measure. Therefore, the aims of this study were to: (1) assess the relationship between the FACT-Cog and the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), a performance-based cognitive measure; and (2) test whether the association between DT and CRCI (using the FACT-Cog) was replicated with the TICS.

Participants and Methods:

Participants completed the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS), the FACT-Cog, and the TICS after undergoing BCa surgery and prior to starting adjuvant therapy [101 women, age >50 years, M(SD)= 61.15(7.76), 43% White Non-Hispanic, 34.4% White Hispanic, 10.8% Black, with nonmetastatic BCa, 55.4% lumpectomy, 36.6% mastectomy; median 29 days post-surgery].

Results:

Although there was a significant correlation between the TICS total score and the FACT-CogQOL subscale (r = 0.347, p < 0.001), the TICS total score was not correlated with scores on the FACT-Cog perceived cognitive impairment (CogPCI), perceived cognitive abilities (CogPCA), or comments from others (CogOth) subscales. However, the TICS memory item, a 10-word list immediate recall task, had a weak statistically significant correlation with CogPCI (r = 0.237, p < 0.032), CogOth (r = 0.223, p < 0.044), and CogPCA (r = 0.233, p < 0.036). Next, the sample was divided based on the participant’s score on TICS memory item (i.e., < vs. > sample mean of 5.09). Results of independent samples t-tests demonstrated significant differences in mean scores for CogPCI, f(80) = -2.09, p = 0.04, Mdt = -7.65, Cohen’s d = 0.483, and CogQOL, f(80) = -2.57, p = 0.01, Mditt = -2.38, Cohen’s d = 0.593. A hierarchical linear regression found that DTS subscale and total scores did not significantly predict performance on the TICS. However, DTS continued to be a significant predictor of poorer FACT-Cog PCI scores while controlling for TICS scores.

Conclusions:

We found a weak relationship between self-reported cognitive impairment and objective cognitive performance (TICS). However, greater self-reported PCI and its impact on QOL was found in participants who scored below the sample mean on a recall task from the TICS. Although perceived ability to tolerate distress continued to predict self-reported PCI on the FACT-Cog, it did not predict overall performance on the TICS. Therefore, responses on the FACT-Cog may be more representative of an individual’s ability to tolerate distress related to perceived CRCI than actual overall cognitive ability or impairment.