Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:04:46.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Winternitz Solution: A Comment*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Resad Kayali  and
Osman Sari
Resad Kayali
Affiliation:
Bogazici University, Istanbul
Osman Sari
Affiliation:
Strategy Research and Planning, Ltd, Istanbul
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Winternitz Solution, which is generally regarded as a receding landmark in the long and still expanding literature on the transformation problem, deserves a closer scrutiny than it has received so far. While the mainstream professional viewpoint regards the Winternitz solution merely as a special case of the general conditions stated in Seton's seminal 1957 article, many students of the history of economic thought in the English speaking world receive their first and often only introduction to the transformation problem from the pages of Mark Blaug's Economic Theory in Retrospect (hereafter ETR-i where i = 1, 2,3,4 denotes the four successive editions of this book). Although Winternitz does not lay out the full economic implications of his solution–presumably because he felt these were of limited mathematical interest, the treatment in Blaug is seriously misleading. Our purpose here is to provide a complete presentation of the Winternitz Solution (Part I) and subsequently to give a critique of Blaug's treatment (Part II).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Fall 1989 , pp. 238 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baumol, W. J., “The Transformation of Values: What Marx ‘Really Meant (An Interpretation),” Journal of Economic Literature, 03 1974, 12(1), pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. “Comment” Journal of Economic Literature, 03 1974, 12(1), pp. 74–75.Google Scholar
Blaug, M., Economic Theory in Retrospect, Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, Richard D., second edition, 1968.Google Scholar
Blaug, M.Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, third edition, 1978.Google Scholar
Blaug, M.Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, fourth edition, 1985.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M., “Samuelson, Marx and Their Latest Critics,” Journal of Economic Literature, 03 1973, 11(1), pp. 59–61.Google Scholar
Desai, M., Marxian Economic Theory, London: Gray-Mills Publishing, Ltd., 1974.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, L., Value and Distribution in Capitalist Economies: An Introduction to Sraffian Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Marx, K., Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 3, New York: International Publishers, 1976.Google Scholar
Morishima, M., Marx's Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. “The Fundamental Marxian Theorem: A Reply to Samuelson,” Journal of Economic Literature, 03 1974, 12(1), pp. 71–74Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A., “Understanding the Marxian Notion of Exploitation: A Summary of the So-called Transformation Problem between Marxian Values and Competitive Prices,” Journal of Economic Literature, 06 1971, 9(2), pp. 399–431.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. “Insight and Detour in the Theory of Exploitation: A Reply to Baumol,” Journal of Economic Literature, 03 1974, 12(1), pp. 62–70.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. “Rejoinder: Merlin Unclothed, A Final Word,” Journal of Economic Literature, 03 1974, 12(1), pp. 75–77Google Scholar
Seton, F., “The ‘Transformation Problem’,” Review of Economic Studies, 24, 1957, pp. 149–160; reprinted inCrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economics of Marx, edited by Howard, M.C. and King, J.E., Penguin Books, 1976, pp. 162–176.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P., Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to A Critique of Economic Theory Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Steedman, I., Marx After Sraffa, Surrey: The Greshman Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P.M., The Theory of Capitalist Development: Principles of Marxian Political Economy, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Winternitz, J., “Values and Prices: A Solution of the So-called Transformation Problem,” The Economic Journal, 06 1948, pp. 276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, R.D., Roberts, B., Callari, A., “Marx's (not Ricardo's) ‘Transformation Problem’: A Radical Reconceptualization,” History of Political Economy, 1982, 14(4), pp. 564–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, R.D., Roberts, B., Callari, A. “A Marxian Alternative to the Traditional Transformation Problem,” Review of Radical Political Economics 1984a, 16(2/3), pp. 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, R.D., Roberts, B., Callari, A. “Unsnarling the Tangle: A Rejoinder,” History of Political Economy 1984b, 16(3), pp. 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, M., “Weaving a Tangled Web: The Transformation of Values into Prices,” History of Political Economy, 1984, 16(3), pp. 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar