Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:21:23.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wagner's Legacy in America: Re-Opening Farnam's Inquiry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Extract

The continual interaction between economic change and economic policies designed to manage or guide this change seldom finds such dramatic expression as when one type of economy replaces another, e. g., when the industrial economy replaces the agrarian or is in turn supplanted by the “post-industrial” economy.

Thus, when the American economy was in the thick of its industrial revolution during the decades around the turn of this century, it was subjected to a series of government interventions the lowest common denominator of which has been summarized in the title of a book by Morton Keller, Regulating a New Economy (1996). In the United States as in all other countries, these interventions consisted of a glorious jumble of attempts to solve problems as they arose, of “bespoke jobs” in response to diverse economic interests, and of sundry ideologically-motivated efforts to move events in particular directions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Backhaus, Jürgen, ed. 1998. Essays on Social Security and Taxation: Gustav von Schmoller and Adolph Wagner Reconsidered. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Balabkins, Nicholas W. 1988. Not by Theory alone … The Economics of Gustav von Schmoller and Its Legacy to America. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Barber, William J., ed. 1988. Breaking the Academic Mould: Economists and American Learning in the Nineteenth Century. Middletown, Conn: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Barkin, Kenneth, 1969. “Adolf Wagner and German Industrial Development.” Journal of Modern History 41: 144–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth. 1957. “A New Look at Institutionalism.” American Economic Review 47: 1–12.Google Scholar
Clark, Evalyn. 1940. “Adolf Wagner: From National Economist to National Socialist.” Political Science Quarterly 55: 378–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1960. “The First Two Decades of the American Economic Association.” American Economic Review 50: 555–74.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1985. “The American Economic Association and the Economics Profession.” Journal of Economic Literature 23: 1697–727.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1987. “Adams, Henry Carter.” In John, Eatwell, Murray, Milgate and Peter, Newman, eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: The Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1987. “Ely, Richard Theodore.” In John, Eatwell, Murray, Milgate and Peter, Newman, eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: The Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1988. “The Educational Revolution and the Professionalization of American Economics.” In Barber, William J., ed., Breaking the Academic Mould. Economists and American Learning in the Nineteenth Century. Middletown, Conn: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Copeland, Morris A. 1958. “Institutionalism and Welfare Economics.” American Economic Review, 48: 1–17.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph. 1949. The Economic Mind in American Civilization Vol. 3, 1865–1918. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph. 1955. “The Role of the German Historical School in American Economic Thought.” American Economic Review 45: 17–39.Google Scholar
Drechsler, Wolfgang. 1997. “State Socialism and Political Philosophy.” In Jürgen, Backhaus, ed., Essays on Social Security and Taxation. Gustav von Schmoller and Adolph Wagner Reconsidered. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Farnam, Henry W. 1908. “Deutsch-amerikanische Beziehungen in der Volkwirtschaftslehre.” In Die Entwicklung der deutschen Volkwirtschaftslehre im neunzehnten Jahrhundert. Gustav Schmoller zur siebenzigsten Wiederkehr seines Geburtstages 24. Juni 1908. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Gide, Charles and Charles, Rist. 1937. A History of Economic Doctrines. London: George G. Harrap & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
Harter, Jr, Lafayette, G. 1962. John R. Commons: His Assault on Laissez-faire. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Heilmann, Martin. 1980. Adolph Wagner—Ein deutscher Nationalökonom im Urteil der Zeit. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Herbst, Jürgen. 1965. The German Historical School in American Scholarship: A Study in the Transfer of Culture. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Terence W. 1953. A Review of Economic Doctrines 1870–1929. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hutter, Michael. 1982. “Early Contributions to Law and Economics: Adolph Wagner's Grundlegung.” Journal of Economic Issues 16: 131–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, John Kells. 1923. A History of Political Economy. London: Black.Google Scholar
Keller, Morton. 1996. Regulating a New Economy: Public Policy and Economic Change in America, 1900–1933. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Gerhard. 1968. “Wagner, Adolf.” International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C. 1949. Lecture Notes on Types of Economic Theory II. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
National Cyclopaedia of American Biography, 1892–1984. New York: James T. White & Co.Google Scholar
Priddat, Birger P. “National-Economic Extension of the Philosophy of Law: Adolph Wagner's Legal Theory of Distribution.” In Jürgen, Backhaus, ed., Essays on Social Security and Taxation: Gustav von Schmoller and Adolph Wagner Reconsidered. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Prisching, Manfred. 1997. “The Preserving and Reforming State: Schmoller's and Wagner's Model of the State.” In Jürgen, Backhaus, ed., Essays on Social Security and Taxation: Gustav von Schmoller and Adolph Wagner Reconsidered. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Rader, Benjamin. 1966. The Academic Mind and Reform: The Influence of Richard T Ely in American Life. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Reich, Hermann. 1987. “Wagner, Adolph.” In John, Eatwell, Murray, Milgate, and Peter, Newman, eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: The Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Rubner, Heinrich. 1978. Adolph Wagner. Briefe, Dokumente, Augenzeugenberichte 1851–1917. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sass, Steven A. 1988. “An Uneasy Relationship: The Business Community and Academic Economists at the University of Pennsylvania.” In Barber, William J., ed. Breaking the Academic Mould: Economists and American Learning in the Nineteenth Century. Middletown, Conn: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Seager, Henry R. 1892–93. “Economics at Berlin and Vienna.” Journal of Political Economy 1: 236–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seckler, David. 1975. Thorstein Veblen and the Institutionalists. A Study in the Social Philosophy of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Senn, Peter R. 1997. “Problems of Determining the Influence of Gustav Schmoller and Adolph Wagner on American Fiscal Policy and Taxation Systems.” In Jürgen, Backhaus, ed., Essays on Social Security and Taxation: Gustav von Schmoller and Adolph Wagner Reconsidered. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Thier, Erich. 1930. Rodbertus/Lassalle/Adolph Wagner: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie und Geschichte des deutschen Staatssozialismus. Leipzig: Buchdruckerei Frankenstein & Wagner.Google Scholar
Wagner, Adolph. 1892–93. Grundlegung der politischen Oekonomie. Erster Theil: Leipzig. C. F. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung.Google Scholar
Wright, Harold R. C. 1997. “Adolph Wagner and the Plural Society.” In Jürgen, Backhaus, ed., Essays on Social Security and Taxation: Gustav von Schmoller and Adolph Wagner Reconsidered. Marburg: Metropolis VerlagGoogle Scholar