No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Sheila Dow, Jesper Jerspersen, and Geoff Tily, eds., The General Theory and Keynes for the 21st Century (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), pp. ix + 208, $130 (hardcover). ISBN: 9781786439871.
Review products
Sheila Dow, Jesper Jerspersen, and Geoff Tily, eds., The General Theory and Keynes for the 21st Century (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), pp. ix + 208, $130 (hardcover). ISBN: 9781786439871.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 June 2019
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2019
References
REFERENCES
Chick, Victoria. 1983. Macroeconomics after Keynes: A Reconsideration of the General Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chick, Victoria. 2002. “Reflections on Caravale’s Contributions Relating to Equilibrium and Their Relation to the Interpretation of Keynes.” In Nisticò, S. and Tosato, D., eds., Competing Economic Theories: Essays in Honour of Giovanni Caravali.” London: Routledge, pp. 167–176.Google Scholar
Chick, Victoria, and Dow, Sheila C.. 2002. “Monetary Policy with Endogenous Money and Liquidity Preference: A Nondualistic Treatment.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 24 (4): 587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Paul. 2015. Post Keynesian Theory and Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, Steven. 2007. Beyond Reduction: Philosophy of Mind and Post-Reductionist Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Jesper, and Madsen, Mogens O., eds. 2012. Keynes’s General Theory for Today. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1973. Collected Writings. Volume XIV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. 1958. “Liquidity-Preference as Behaviour towards Risk.” Review of Economic Studies 25 (2): 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar