Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:55:56.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE RISE OF GREED IN EARLY ECONOMIC THOUGHT: FROM DEADLY SIN TO SOCIAL BENEFIT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2012

RUDI VERBURG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses the historical changes in economic and ideological conditions through which greed turned from one of the deadly sins into a passion from which society derived social benefits. Adding to the perspective developed by Hirschman in his The Passions and the Interests, three stages are distinguished in the construction of the notion of the social utility of greed: (1) the self-sufficient community; (2) the mercantile state; and (3) commercial society. The paper relates how changing conditions led philosophers in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to recognize the conditional usefulness of greed and, eventually, to build a dream on the idea of greed as instrumental in establishing the material foundation of progress in society.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 515 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akerlof, G. A., and Shiller, R. J.. 2009. Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1968. The Nichomachian Ethics. Translated by Rackman, H., Aristotle in 23 volumes, vol. XIX, Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann/Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brassey, A., and Barber, S., eds. 2009. Greed. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, W. F. 1987. “The Old Art of Political Economy.” In Todd Lowry, S., ed., Pre-Classical Economic Thought. Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, . 1975. De Officiis. Translated by Miller, W.. Cicero in 28 volumes, vol. XXI, Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. 1969. Revisions in Mercantilism. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Crouzet, François. 2001. A History of the European Economy, 1000–2000. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Davenant, Charles. 1698. Discourses on the Publick Revenues, and on the Trade of England. London. <Available from: eebo.chadwyck.com>Google Scholar
DeHaye, L. 2008. “Mercantilism.” In Durlauf, S. N. and Blume, L. E., eds., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second edition. Basingstoke/New YorkPalgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K. W. 1951. “Mechanism, Organism, and Society: Some Models in Natural and Social Science.” Philosophy of Science 18 (3): 230–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, R. B., and Tollison, R. D.. 1981. Mercantilism as a Rent-seeking Society; Economic Regulation in Historical Perspective. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Faccarello, G. 1999. The Foundations of Laissez-Faire; The Economics of Pierre de Boisguilbert. London & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. 2009. The Myth of the Rational Market. A History of Risk, Reward and Delusion on Wall Street. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Gay, Peter. 1977. The Enlightenment: An Interpretation/The Science of Freedom. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Gordon, Barry. 1975. Economic Analysis before Adam Smith: Hesiod to Lessius. London/Basingstoke: The MacMillan Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, A. 1959. The Development of Economic Doctrine. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. D. 1977. The Economics of A.R.J. Turgot. Edited and translated by Groenewegen, . The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, J. A. W. 1968. “Interest Will Not Lie: A Seventeenth-Century Political Maxim.” Journal of the History of Ideas 29: 551–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazard, Paul. [1935] 1961. La crise de la conscience européenne 1680–1715. Paris: Fayard. Translated as: The European Mind [1680–1715]. Cleveland: The World Pub. Comp.Google Scholar
Hecht, Jacqueline. 1966. Pierre de Boisguilbert, ou la naissance de l’économie politique. Vol. II: Oeuvres, manuscriptes et imprimées. Paris: INED.Google Scholar
Heckscher, E. F. [1935] 1994. Mercantilism. Two volumes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, R. L., and Milberg, W.. 2009. The Making of Economic Society. Twelfth edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Herlitz, L. 1993. “Conceptions of History and Society in Mercantilism, 1650–1730.” In Magnusson, Lars. ed., Mercantilist Economics. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 87–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests; Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1987. Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary. Edited by Miller, E. F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, D. A. 1996. Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, E. D. 1972. Pierre Nicole: Jansenist and Humanist. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Eric L. 1988. Growth Recurring; Economic Change in World History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Karayiannis, A. D., and Dodd, S. D.. 1998. “The Greek Christian Fathers.” In Lowry, S. Todd and Gordon, B., eds., Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice. Leiden/New York/Koln: Brill, pp. 163–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O. 1974. “Nonconformist Absolutism in Louis XIV’s France: Pierre Nicole and Denis Veiras.” Journal of the History of Ideas 35: 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O. 1980. Philosophy and the State in France; The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton/New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, David S. 1969. The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langholm, O. 1987. “Scholastic Economics.” In Lowry, S. Todd, ed., Pre-Classical Economic Thought. Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 115–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langholm, O. 1998. “The Medieval Schoolmen (1200–1400).” In Lowry, S. Todd and Gordon, B., eds., Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice. Leiden/New York/Koln: Brill, pp. 439–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, T. J. 1978. “Acquisition and Anxiety: Aristotle’s Case against the Market.” Canadian Journal of Economics 11 (1): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, L. K. 1978. Religious Poverty and the Profit Economy in Medieval Europe. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lowry, S. Todd. 1987. “The Greek Heritage in Economic Thought.” In Lowry, S. Todd, ed., Pre-Classical Economic Thought. Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 7–30. Lovejoy, Arthur O. [1936] 1978. The Great Chain of Being; A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 1987. “The Language of Mercantilism,” In Lowry, S. Todd, ed., Pre-Classical Economic Thought. Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 1993. Mercantilist Economics. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 1994. Mercantilism: The Shaping of an Economic Language. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. [1724] 1988. The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, edited by Kaye, F. B.. Two volumes. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1951. “Physiocracy and Classicism in Britain.” The Economic Journal 61 (241): 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2007. “The Market for Ideas and the Origins of Economic Growth in Eighteenth Century Europe.” Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis 4 (1): 3–38.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2006. “Mercantilism, the Enlightenment, and the Industrial Revolution.” In Findlay, R. et al. ., eds., Eli Heckscher, International Trade, and Economic History. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press, pp. 269–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Jerry Z. 2002. The Mind and the Market. Capitalism in Modern European Thought. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Mun, Thomas. [1664] 1959. England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade, or, The Ballance of our Forraign Trade is The Rule of our Treasure. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Myers, M. L. 1972. “Philosophical Anticipations of Laissez-Faire.” History of Political Economy 4 (1): 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicole, Pierre. 1696. Moral essays, contain’d in several treatises on many important duties. Four volumes. London. <Available from: eebo.chadwyck.com>Google Scholar
North, Dudley. 1691. Discourses Upon Trade. London: Tho Basset. <Available from: eebo.chadwyck.com>Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. 1962. Pensées. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Perrotta, C. 1997. “The Preclassical Theory of Development: Increased Consumption Raises Productivity.” History of Political Economy 29 (2): 295–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. A. 2009. A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of ‘08 and the Descent into Depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raab, F. 1964. The English Face of Machiavelli: A Changing Interpretation, 1500–1700. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Routh, Guy. 1977. The Origins of Economic Ideas. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Rowlands, A. 1999. “The Conditions of Life for the Masses.” In Camera, E., ed., Early Modern Europe: An Oxford History. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–62.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. [1954] 1972. History of Economic Analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, A. 1977. Jansenism in the Seventeenth-Century France. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1759] 1976a. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by Macfie, A. L. and Raphael, D. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1976b. An Inquiry into the Causes and Nature of the Wealth of Nations. Edited by Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1776.Google Scholar
Spengler, J. J. 1984. “Boisguilbert’s Economic Views vis-à-vis Those of Contemporary Réformateurs.” History of Political Economy 16 (1): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, H. W. 1971. The Growth of Economic Thought. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. 2010. Freefall: America, Free Markets and the Sinking of the World Economy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Viner, J. 1978. “Religious Thought and Economic Society: Four Chapters of an Unfinished Work.” History of Political Economy 10 (1): 114–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, J. de, and Woude, A. van der. 1997. The First Modern Economy: Success, Failure, and Perseverance of the Dutch Economy, 1500–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, R. C. 1974. “Mercantilism and the Idea of Progress.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 8 (1): 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, R. C. 1987. “The Development of Mercantilist Thought.” In Lowry, S. Todd, ed., Pre-Classical Economic Thought. Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 147–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. 1984. England’s Apprenticeship 1603–1763. Second edition. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Wood, D. 2002. Medieval Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worland, S. T. 1987. “Scholastic Economics.” In Lowry, S. Todd, ed., Pre-Classical Economic Thought. Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. 1988. Continuity, Chance and Change. The Character of the Industrial Revolution in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaratiegui, J. M. 1999. “The Imperialism of Economics over Ethics.” Journal of Markets & Morality 2, 2 (Fall): 208–219.Google Scholar