Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:19:30.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ricardo's Capital Levy Proposal: “By-Product of A Visionary”?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Nancy Churchman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The British public debt grew to unprecedented levels during the course of the Napoleonic Wars, and the debt service burden, aggravated by deflation, was reaching alarming heights in the postwar period, absorbing over half of all tax revenue. David Ricardo was prompted by economic analysis and existing circumstances to advocate the rapid redemption of existing public debt by means of a “capital levy,” a one-time tax on the nation's property. In print, he advocated the proposal in “The Funding System,” an entry in a supplementary volume of the Encyclopaedia Britannica published in 1820, in which he wrote that “by one great effort, we should get rid of one of the most terrible scourges which was ever invented to afflict a nation” (Ricardo 1951–73, IV, p. 197).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , Spring 1997 , pp. 93 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahiakpor, James. 1985. “Ricardo on Money: The Operational Significance of the Non-Neutrality of Money in the Short Run” History of Political Economy, 17, no. 1, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asso, P. F. and Barucci, E.. 1988. “Ricardo on the National Debt and Its Redemption: Some Notes on an Unpublished Manuscript” Economic Notes, 2, 5–36.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1985. “Ricardo and the Problems of Economic Policy” Gli Economisti e la Politica Economica, edited by Roggi, P., Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, Naples.Google Scholar
Brougham, Henry Lord. 1839. Historical Sketches of Statesmen Who Flourished in the Time of George III, Charles Knight and Company, London.Google Scholar
Cannan, Edwin. 1894. “David Ricardo in Parliament I and II” Economic Journal, 4, 249–61, 409–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchman, Nancy. 1995. “David Ricardo on Public Policy: The Question of Motive” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17, Spring, 133–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchman, Nancy. 1997. David Ricardo on Public Debt. University of Toronto, Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. F. 1886–1987. “Ricardo's Use of Facts” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1, 474–76.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Manuel. 1953. “The Capital Levy and Deadweight Debt in England, 1815–1840” Journal of Finance, 8, no. 1, 34–46.Google Scholar
Halévy, Elie. 1955. The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism, Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, E. L. 1830. The National Debt, Augustus, M. Kelley, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1979. The Economics of David Ricardo, Heinemann Educational Books, London.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1995. Ricardo—The “New View”: Collected Essays I, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Mallet, J. L. 1921. Diary entries in Political Economy Club: Minutes of Proceedings 1899–1920, Roll of Members, and Questions Discussed, 1821–1920, with Documents Bearing on the History of the Club, 6, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1823. “Financial Accounts of the United Kingdom for the Year Ended 5th January 1823” Edinburgh Review, 34, no. 77, October, 1–43.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1827. “Remarks on the Financial Situation of Great Britain” Edinburgh Review, October, 390–414.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1975. The Classical Economists, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Patrick K. 1988. “The Political Economy of British Taxation, 1660–1815” Economic History Review, 2nd series, 41, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Driscoll, Gerald P. 1977. “The Ricardian Nonequivalence Theorem” Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1, 207–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1951–1973. Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by Piero, Sraffa and Maurice, Dobb, 11 vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1991. “Three Unpublished Letters by David Ricardo” edited by Heertje, A., History of Political Economy, 23, no. 3, 519–26.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1952. The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Shoup, Carl. 1960. Ricardo on Taxation, Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowell, Thomas. 1974. Classical Economics Reconsidered, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. 1823. Parliamentary Debates Geo. IV, 8, March 11, 535.Google Scholar