Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T09:51:39.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RICARDO AND RICARDIANS ON THE ORDER OF CULTIVATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

Christian Bidard
Christian Bidard*
Affiliation:
Economix, UPL, University Paris Nanterre, CNRS, F-92000 Nanterre, France.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Ricardian dynamics are based on the study of the order of cultivation when demand increases. Piero Sraffa criticized David Ricardo for having assumed that the incoming method is defined by a natural order, and stressed that the law of succession of methods is based on a profitability criterion. Then, in the case of intensive cultivation, the question is whether the incoming method is indeed more productive than the one it replaces. Sraffa’s argument relies on the positivity of rent. However, there is a flaw in his reasoning, and a failure of the Ricardian dynamics is possible. Post-Sraffian scholars have misunderstood that construction and have substituted a static approach for it. The critiques they address to Sraffa are better understood by returning to Ricardo and Sraffa’s own methodology. Fifty years ago, mathematicians rediscovered Ricardo’s approach independently and worked out a powerful algorithm inspired by it.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 389 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

With acknowledgments to Guido Erreygers, Arrigo Oppocher, and Ian Steedman, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. The paper is dedicated to René de Marmier’s memory.

References

REFERENCES

Abraham-Frois, Gilbert, and Berrebi, Edmond. 1980. Rentes, Raretés, Surprofits. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J. 1951. Economic Dynamics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bidard, Christian. 2004. Prices, Reproduction, Scarcity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bidard, Christian. 2010. “The Dynamics of Intensive Cultivation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (6): 1097–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidard, Christian. 2014. “The Ricardian Rent Theory: An Overview.” Centro Sraffa Working Papers 8.Google Scholar
Bidard, Christian, ed. 1987. La Rente. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Cottle, Richard W., Pang, Jong-Shi, and Stone, Richard E.. 1992. The Linear Complementarity Problem. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
D’Agata, Antonio. 1983. “The Existence and Unicity of Cost-Minimizing Systems in Intensive Rent Theory.” Metroeconomica 35: 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erreygers, Guido. 1990. “Terre, Rente et Choix de Techniques.” PhD thesis. Two volumes. Mimeo. University Paris X-Nanterre.Google Scholar
Erreygers, Guido. 1995. “On the Uniqueness of Cost-Minimizing Techniques.” The Manchester School 63: 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freni, Giuseppe. 1991. “Capitale tecnico nei modelli dinamici ricardiani.” Studi Economici 44: 141–159.Google Scholar
Klimovsky, Edith. 1981. “La rente dans la théorie de la valeur et des prix.” PhD thesis. Mimeo. University of Paris X-Nanterre.Google Scholar
Kurz, Heinz D., and Salvadori, Neri. 1995. Theory of Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Carlton E. 1965. “Bimatrix Equilibrium Points and Mathematical Programming.” Management Science 11: 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montani, Guido. 1975. “Scarce Natural Resources and Income Distribution.” Metroeconomica 27: 68–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, Alberto. 1966. Rendita e distribuzione in un modello economico plurisettorale. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. [1815] 1951. An Essay on the Influence of a Low Price of Corn on the Profits of Stocks. In Sraffa, Piero, ed., The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Volume IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–41.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. [1817] 1951. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. In Sraffa, Piero, ed., The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salvadori, Neri. 1986. “Land and Choice of Techniques within the Sraffa Framework.” Australian Economic Papers 25: 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saucier, Philippe. 1981. “Le choix des techniques en situation de limitation des ressources.” PhD thesis. Mimeo. University Paris II.Google Scholar
Schefold, Bertram. 1989. Mr. Sraffa on Joint Production and Other Essays. London: Unwin Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar