Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:19:39.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Economic Knowledge: Review of Jan Golinski's Making Natural Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Esther-Mirjam Sent
Esther-Mirjam Sent
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When I went through my graduate training in economics at Stanford University, I learned that economics consists of ideas. These are often expressed in mathematical terms and can be found in books and articles. To become a successful economist, you have to understand these ideas and come up with variations on them. So, during my first year of graduate studies, I spent the majority of my time working my way through the many books and articles assigned for my classes in microeconomics, macroeconomics, and econometrics. During their lectures, our instructors would walk us through any difficult mathematical manipulations that we encountered in our readings. Surely, I thought, I was on my way to becoming a respected economist. Still, I needed to specialize in a few fields, which I did in my second year.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 267 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashmore, Malcolm. 1989. The Reflexive Thesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., ed. 1994. New Directions in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel and Latour, Bruno. 1992. “Don't Throw the Baby Out With the Bath School! A Reply to Collins and Yearly.” In Pickering, Andrew ed., Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 343–68.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M. 1991. “The Meaning of Replication and the Science of Economics.” Journal of Political Economy 23 (1): 123–42.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M. 1992. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M. and Yearly, Steven. 1992a. “Epistemological Chicken.” In Pickering, Andrew, ed., Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 301–26.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M. 1992b. “Journey into Space.” In Pickering, Andrew, ed., Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 369–89.Google Scholar
Gale, George and Pinnick, Cassandra L. 1997. “Stalking Theoretical Physicists: An Ethnography Flounders: A Response to Merz and Knorr Cetina.” Social Studies of Science 27 (1): 113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Golinski, Jan. 1998. Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M., ed. 1994. The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1983. Conversations with Economists. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo and Colander, David. 1990. The Making of an Economist. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo, McCloskey, D. N., and Solow, Robert M., eds. 1988. The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1992. “One More Turn after the Social Turn.” In McMullin, Ernan, ed. The Social Dimensions of Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 272–94.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science As Social Knowledge. Princeton, WI: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan, ed., 1992a. The Social Dimensions of Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan. 1992b. “Introduction: The Social Dimensions of Science.” In McMullin, Ernan, ed., The Social Dimensions of Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Merz, Martina and Cetina, Karin Knorr. 1997a. “Deconstruction in a ‘Thinking’ Science: Theoretical Physicists at Work.” Social Studies of Science 27 (1): 73–111.Google Scholar
Merz, Martina and Cetina, Karin Knorr. 1997b. “Floundering or Frolicking—How Does Ethnography Fare in Theoretical Physics? (and What Sort of Ethnography?): A Reply to Gale and Pinnick.” Social Studies of Science 27 (1): 123–31.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip E. Forthcoming. Machine Dreams: Economics as a Cyborg Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip E. and Sent, Esther-Mirjam, eds. Forthcoming. Science Bought and Sold. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mulkay, Michael. 1979. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Niehans, Jürg. 1990. A History of Economic Theory. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pera, Marcello and Shea, William R., eds. 1991. Persuading Science. Canton, OH: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1992a. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1992b. “From Science as Knowledge to Science as Practice.” In Pickering, Andrew, ed., Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Andrew, Pickering, ed. 1993. “The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (3): 559–89.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1995a. “Beyond Constraint: The Temporality of Practice and the Historicity of Knowledge.” In Buchwald, Jed Z., ed., Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 42–55.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1995b. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 1998. The Evolving Rationality of Rational Expectations: An Assessment of Thomas Sargent's Achievements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1991a. Stabilizing Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. ed. 1991b. “Reconstructing Economic Knowledge.” History of Political Economy 23: 101–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolgar, Steve, ed. 1988. Knowledge and Reflexivity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steve, ed. 1992. “Some Remarks About Positionism A Reply to Collins and Yearly.” In Pickering, Andrew, ed., Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 327–42.Google Scholar