Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:19:25.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GRAHAM’S THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL VALUES REVISITED: A RICARDIAN TRADE MODEL WITH LINK COMMODITIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2021

Hideo Sato
Hideo Sato*
Affiliation:
Hideo Sato: Tohoku University, Japan.
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Frank D. Graham (1890–1949) presented an innovative multi-country, multi-commodity trade model that attached great importance to link commodities and quantity adjustments, not perfect specializations and price adjustments as emphasized by John Stuart Mill and Alfred Marshall. However, due to some shortcomings, this model was not sufficiently understood and has been forgotten. This study reconstructs Graham’s theory of international values by rectifying the shortcomings. Through this reconstruction, the following is clarified. First, in multi-country, multi-commodity trade models, the existence of link commodities is general and perfect specializations seldom appear; therefore, quantity adjustments are normally performed in the face of demand shifts. Second, notwithstanding unchanging sectoral productivity at a national level, national wage rates can vary greatly according to the patterns of the international division of labor. Third, while the domestic relative wage rate increases with an increase in a home country’s productivity of link commodities, it does not increase with an increase in the productivity of commodities produced only in the home country.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 193 - 218
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Kazuhiro Kurose (Tohoku University), Yoshinori Shiozawa (Osaka City University, Professor Emeritus), and anonymous referees for their useful suggestions and helpful comments. Further, I would like to thank Enago for their English-language review.

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 18K01560.

References

REFERENCES

Bastable, C. Francis. 1903. The Theory of International Trade with Some of Its Applications to Economic Policy. Fourth edition. London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Bobulescu, Roxana. 2002. “The ‘Paradox’ of F. Graham (1890–1949): A Study in the Theory of International Trade.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 9 (3): 402–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipman, John. S. 1965. “A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 1, the Classical Theory.” Econometrica 33 (3): 477–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro. 1894. “The Theory of International Values III.” Economic Journal 4 (16): 606–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G. Alexander. 1950. “The Theory of International Values.” Journal of Political Economy 58 (1): 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, Leonard. 1990. Neoclassical International Economics: An Historical Survey. Houndmills and London: Macmillan Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Frank Dunstone. 1923a. “Some Aspects of Protection Further Considered.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 37 (2): 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Frank Dunstone. 1923b. “The Theory of International Values Re-examined.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 38 (1): 54–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Frank Dunstone. 1932. “The Theory of International Values.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 46 (4): 581–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Frank Dunstone. 1948. The Theory of International Values. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grubel, Herbert Gunter. 1967. “Intra-Industry Specialization and the Pattern of Trade.” Canadian Journal of Economics 33 (3): 374–388.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A. 1996. Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Ronald W. 1961. “Comparative Advantage and the Theory of Tariffs: A Multi-Country, Multi-Commodity Model.” Review of Economic Studies 28 (3): 161–175. Reprinted in Ronald Jones, International Trade: Essays in Theory. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: North-Holland Pub. Co, 1979, Ch. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Ronald W. 1977. “‘Two-ness’ in Trade Theory: Costs and Benefits.” Special Papers in International Economics, No. 12, 1-43. Princeton University. Reprinted in Ronald Jones, International Trade: Essays in Theory. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: North-Holland Pub. Co, 1979, Ch. 18.Google Scholar
Jones, Ronald W. 1979. International Trade: Essays in Theory. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: North-Holland Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1980. “Scale Economies, Production Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.” American Economic Review 70 (5): 950–959.Google Scholar
Lester, Richard. 1950. “In Memoriam: Frank Dunstone Graham 1890–1949.” Papers and Proceedings of the Sixty-Second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. American Economic Review 40 (2): 585–587.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur. [1969] 1983. Aspects of Tropical Trade, 1883–1965. In Gersovitz, M., ed., Selected Economic Writings of W. Arthur Lewis. New York: New York University Press, pp. 235–281.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. [1879] 1997. The Pure Theory of Foreign Trade. The Pure Theory of Domestic Values. In Groenewegen, Peter, ed., Collected Works of Alfred Marshall. Volume I: Collected Essays 1872–1917. Bristol: Overstone Press; and Tokyo: Kyokuto Shoten Ltd., pp. 77–155.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1923. Money Credit and Commerce. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Lionel W. 1954a. “Specialization and Efficiency in World Production.” Review of Economic Studies 21 (3): 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Lionel W. 1954b. “On Equilibrium in Graham’s Model of World Trade and Other Competitive Systems.” Econometrica 22 (2): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Lionel W. 1976. “Why Compute Equilibria?” In Los, Jerzy and Los, Maria W., eds., Computing Equilibria: How and Why. Proceedings of the international conference organized by the Computing Centre of the Polish Academy of Sciences, held in Torun, July 1974. New York: North-Holland Pub. Co., pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Lionel W. 1999. “A Scholar’s Progress.” Keio Economic Studies 36 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Melitz, Jacques. 1963. “Sidgwick’s Theory of International Values.” Economic Journal 73 (291): 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melvin, James. R. 1969. “On a Demand Assumption Made by Graham.” Southern Economic Journal 36 (1): 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzler, Lloyd A. 1950. “Graham’s Theory of International Values.” American Economic Review 40 (3): 301–322.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1852. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Third edition. London: John W. Parker and Son.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. Shield. 1897. Principles of Political Economy. Volume II. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. Luigi. 1981. Structural Change and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of the Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sato, Hideo. 2017. “An Overview of Research into International Values in Japan.” In Shiozawa, Yoshinori, Oka, Tosihiro, and Taichi, Tabuchi, eds, A New Construction of Ricardian Theory of International Values: Analytical and Historical Approach. Singapore: Springer, pp. 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Hideo. 2021. “A Two-Country, Three-Commodity Ricardian Trade Model with Keynesian Unemployment.” Metroeconomica 72 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiozawa, Yoshinori. 2013. Subtropical Convex Geometry as the Ricardian Theory of International Trade. Discussion paper uploaded in Shiozawa’s contribution page in ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236020268_Subtropical_Convex_Geometry_as_the_Ricardian_Theory_of_International_Trade. Accessed March 9, 2021.Google Scholar
Shiozawa, Yoshinori. 2017a. “The New Theory of International Values: An Overview.” In Shiozawa, Yoshinori, Oka, Tosihiro, and Taichi, Tabuchi, eds., A New Construction of Ricardian Theory of International Values: Analytical and Historical Approach. Singapore: Springer, pp. 3–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiozawa, Yoshinori. 2017b. “An Origin of the Neoclassical Revolution: Mill’s “Reversion” and Its Consequences.” In Shiozawa, Yoshinori, Oka, Tosihiro, and Taichi, Tabuchi, eds., A New Construction of Ricardian Theory of International Values: Analytical and Historical Approach. Singapore: Springer, pp. 191–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1887. The Principles of Political Economy. Second edition. London/New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stirling, Patrick James. [1853] 1969. The Australian and Californian Gold Discoveries, and Their Probable Consequences. New York: Greenwood Press, Publishers.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1937. Studies in the Theory of International Trade. New York/London: Harper & Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
von Mangoldt, Hans. [1863] 1975. “On the Equation of International Demand.” Journal of International Economics 5 (1): 55–97. The German original is Appendix II of Mangoldt’s book Grundriß der Volkswirthschaftslehre, published in 1863, translated from German by S. Schach, edited by J. S. Chipman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitin, Thomson M. 1953. “Classical Theory, Graham’s Theory, and Linear Programming in International Trade.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 67 (4): 520–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar