Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:08:34.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Justice in The Natural Law Tradition: Thomas Aquinas to Francis Hutcheson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Jeffrey T. Young  and
Barry Gordon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After three or more decades of mainly positivistic readings of the economics of Adam Smith, there was a decided movement following the bicentennial of the publication of the Wealth of Nations to broaden the agenda of Smithian studies. The publication in 1978 of the Report of 1762–63 of Smith's lectures in jurisprudence added impetus to this movement. In particular, historians of ideas began to pay increased attention to Smith's concern with justice in economic life. That attention has evoked renewed interest in certain of Smith's intellectual antecedents who may have played a part in shaping his ideas, but whose influence has remained a matter of relative neglect in modern scholarship.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , Spring 1992 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, Thomas. 1871–1880. De emptione et venditione, in Opera Omnia, 27, Vivès, Paris.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1964. Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, Library of Living Catholic Thought, Chicago.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1976. Ethics, translated by Thompson, J. A. K., Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, England.Google Scholar
Bowley, Marian. 1973. Studies in the History of Economic Theory Before 1870, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Vivien. 1987. “Value and Property in the History of Economic Thought: An Analysis of the Emergence of Scarcity,” Oeconomia, 7, 03, 85–112.Google Scholar
Clark, Charles. 1988. “Natural Law Influences on Adam Smith,” Quaderni di Storia dell'Economica Politica, 6, 59–86.Google Scholar
De Roover, Raymond. 1957. “Joseph A. Schumpeter and Scholastic Economics,” Kyklos, 10, fasc. 2, 115–43,.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Roover, Raymond. 1958. “The Concept of the Just Price: Theory and Economic Policy,” Journal of Economic History, 18, 12, 418–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Roover, Raymond. 1974. “Scholastic Economics: Survival and Lasting Influence from the Sixteenth Century to Adam Smith,” in Business, Banking and Economic Thought in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, J. 1969. The Church and Economic Activity in the Middle Ages, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Grice-Hutchinson, M. 1952. The School of Salamanca, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gordon, Barry. 1975. Economic Analysis Before Adam Smith, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 1625. The Law of War and Peace, Bobbs-Merrill, New York, 1925.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. 1981. The Science of a Legislator; The Natural Jurisprudence of Hume and Smith, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1973. The Economics of Adam Smith, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, Istvan and Michael, Ignatieff, eds. 1983. Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1978. A Treatise on Human Nature, edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A.; 2d ed., edited by Nidditch, P. H., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 1969. A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy, Georg Olms, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Langenstein, Henrich von. 1484–85. Tractatus de contractibus, in Gerson, J., Opera Omnia, 4, Cologne.Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd. 1979. Value and Price in the Aristotelian Tradition, Universitetsforlaget, Bergan, Norway.Google Scholar
Lessius, Leonard. 1630. De Justitia et Jure, Lyons.Google Scholar
Lugo, Juan de. N.d.De Justitia et Jure, in Disputationes Scholasticae et morales, 7, Vivès, Paris, 1893.Google Scholar
Moore, James and Michael, Silverthorne. 1983. “Gershom Carmichael and the Natural Jurisprudence Tradition in Eighteenth-Century Scotland,” in Hont, and Ignatieff, 1983, 73–87.Google Scholar
Molina, Luis. 1733. De Justitia et Jure, in Opera Omnia, 2, Geneva.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1975. The Classical Economists, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
O'Brien, G. 1920. An Essay on Medieval Economic Teaching, London.Google Scholar
O'Rahilly, Alfred. 1928. “Notes on St. Thomas,” The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, 31, 159–68.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. 1660. Elementoram Jurisprudentiae Universalis Libri Duo, 2, 1660; 2d ed., 1672; Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1931.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. 1673. De Officio Hominis et Civis Juxta Legem Naturalem Libri Duo, reprinted 1682; Oxford Press, New York, 1927.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. 1688. De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo, 2, 1672, revised 1688, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1934.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns. N.d.In IV libros sententiarum, in Opera Omnia, 18, I.I.S., Paris, 1891–1895.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1976. Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stark, W. 1956. The Contained Economy, Blackfriars, London.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. 1982. “From Pufendorf to Adam Smith: The Natural Law Tradition in Scotland,” in Europaisches Rechtsdenken in Geschichte und Gegenwart: Festschrift für Helmut Coing, Beck, Verlag C. H., Munich, 667–79.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. L. 1955. “Gershom Carmichael: A Neglected Figure in British Political Economy,” South African Journal of Economics, 23, 09, 251–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teichgraeber, Richard. 1986. ‘Free Trade’ and Moral Philosophy; Rethinking the Sources of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, Duke University Press, Durham.Google Scholar
Young, Jeffrey T. 1986. “Natural Jurisprudence and the Impartial Spectator: A Reconsideration of Adam Smith's Theory of Value,” History of Political Economy, 18, no. 3, Fall, 365–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Jeffrey T. 1990. “David Hume and Adam Smith on Value Premises in Economics,” History of Political Economy, 22, no. 4, Winter, 643–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Jeffrey T. 1991. “Natural Jurisprudence and the Labor Theory of Value in Adam Smith,” unpublished.Google Scholar