Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:56:58.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DEVIL IN DETAILS: BENTHAM'S POLITICAL TACTICS AS A THEORY OF AGENDA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

MARCO E. L. GUIDI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Mini-Symposium on Early Law and Economics
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 317 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balakrishnan, P.V. Sundar, Patton, Charles, and Lewis, Phillip A.. 1993. “Towards a Theory of Agenda Setting in Negotiations.” Journal of Consumer Research 19 (March): 637–54.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1776. “Fragment on Government.” In Bentham, Jeremy, A Comment on the Commentaries and A Fragment on Government, edited by Burns, James H. and Hart, Herbert L.A.. London: Athlone Press, 1977, pp. 391–551.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1787. “Defence of Usury.” In Jeremy Bentham's Economic Writings, Vol. 1, edited by Stark, Werner. London: Allen and Unwin, 1952, pp. 123–207.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1788. “Considérations d'un Anglois sur la composition des États-Généraux y compris réponses aux questions proposées aux Notables &c.” In Bentham, Jeremy, Rights, Representation, and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution, edited by Schofield, Philip, Pease-Watkin, Catherine, and Blamires, Cyprian. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002, pp. 63–146.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1791. Panopticon; or, The Inspection House. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 4, edited by Bowring, John. Edinburgh: Tait, 1838-43, pp. 37–172.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1795. “Nonsense upon Stilts, or Pandora's Box Opened, or the French Declaration of Rights prefixed to the Constitution of 1791 laid open and exposed—with a comparative sketch of what has been done on the same subject in the Constitution of 1795, and a sample of citizen Sieyès.” In Bentham, Jeremy, Rights, Representation, and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution, edited by Schofield, Philip, Pease-Watkin, Catherine, and Blamires, Cyprian. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002, pp. 315–402.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1793-95. “Manual of Political Economy.” In Jeremy Bentham's Economic Writings, Vol. 1, edited by Stark, Werner. London: Allen and Unwin, 1952, pp. 221–73.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1795-96. “Proposal for the Circulation of a [New] Species of Paper Currency.” In Jeremy Bentham's Economic Writings Vol. 2, edited by Stark, Werner. London: Allen and Unwin, 1952, pp. 153–200.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1808-12. Rationale of Judicial Procedure. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vols. 6-8, edited by Bowring, John. Edinburgh: Tait, 1838–43.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1811. “Théorie des peines et des récompenses.” In Oeuvres de Jérémie Bentham, Vol. 2, edited by Dumont, Etienne, Bruxelles: Haumann, 1829–30.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1825. “Rationale of Reward.” In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 2, edited by Bowring, John. Edinburgh: Tait, 1838-43, pp. 189–266.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1830a. Rationale of Punishment. London: Robert Heward.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1830b. Constitutional Code, Vol. I, edited by Rosen, Frederick and Hume, L. J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1843. Political Tactics, edited by James, Michael, Blamires, Cyprian, and Pease-Watkin, Catherine. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 2002. Rights, Representation, and Reform. Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution, edited by Schofield, Philip, Pease-Watkin, Catherine, and Blamires, Cyprian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cot, Annie L. 1990. “Jeremy Bentham et la Révolution française.” In Faccarello, Gilbert and Steiner, Philippe, eds., La pensée économique pendant la Révolution française, special issue of Economies et sociétés 7-8-9, série Oeconomia. Histoire de la pensée économique (PE 13): 477–85.Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, John R. 1975. “Bentham's Transition to Political Radicalism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (4): 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinwiddy, John R. 1989. Bentham. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guidi, Marco E. L. 1990a. “Le citoyen Bentham, ‘raisonnable censeur des lois', et l’économie de la Révolution française.” In Faccarello, Gilbert and Steiner, Philippe, eds., La pensée économique pendant la Révolution française, special issue of Economies et sociétés 7-8-9, série Oeconomia. Histoire de la pensée économique (PE 13): 487–504.Google Scholar
Guidi, Marco E. L. 1990b. “‘Shall the Blind Lead Those Who Can See?' Bentham's Theory of Political Economy.” In Moggridge, Donald, ed., Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, Vol. II: Classical, Marxians and Neo-Classicals. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 10–28.Google Scholar
Guidi, Marco E. L. 2002. “Bentham's Economics of Legislation.”Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice 20 (2-3): 165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidi, Marco E. L. 2004. “‘My Own Utopia.’ The Economics of Bentham's Panopticon.” In Guidi, Marco E. L., ed., Utilitarianism and Economics: Historical Approaches, special issue of The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 11 (3): 405–31.Google Scholar
Guidi, Marco E. L. 2008. “From Emulation to Reputation: The Economic and Political Uses of the Pleasures of the Popular Sanction in Bentham's Thought.” In Fukagai, Yasunori, Guidi, Marco E. L., and Schofield, Philip, eds., Political Economy and the Science of Government: The Economic Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hargreaves Heap, Shaun, Hollis, Martin, Lyons, Bruce, Sugden, Robert, and Weale, Albert. 1992. The Theory of Choice: A Critical Guide. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harrison, Ross. 1983. Bentham. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hume, L. J. 1981. Bentham and Bureaucracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Michael, Blamires, Cyprian, and Pease-Watkin, Catherine. 1999. “Editorial Introduction.” In Bentham, Jeremy, Political Tactics, edited by James, Michael, Blamires, Cyprian, and Pease-Watkin, Catherine. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999, pp. v–xxxii.Google Scholar
Manning, David J. 1968. The Mind of Jeremy Bentham. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Mercier, Louis-Sébastien. 1770. L'An 2440, Rêve s'il n'en fut jamais. Paris: La Découverte, 1999.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1838. “Bentham.” In Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, edited by Robson, John M.. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press, 1969, pp. 75–115.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1861. “Utilitarianism.” In: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X, Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, edited by Robson, John M.. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press, 1969, pp. 203–59.Google Scholar
Rosen, Frederick. 1983. Jeremy Bentham and Representative Democracy: A Study of the Constitutional Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip. 1996. “Bentham and the Identification of Interests.” Utilitas 8 (2): 223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Philip. 2006. Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by Campbell, R. H., Skinner, A. S., and Todd, W. B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar