Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:46:49.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Canonical Classical Growth Model: Content, Adherence and Priority

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Samuel Hollander
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ricardo “and his chief followers … did not express their meaning with sufficient clearness, and they have been misunderstood by all but the most careful readers” (Marshall, 1920, p. 84).

“Ricardo … has not been fortunate in finding careful students” (Cairnes, 1874, p. 237).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 253 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, Samuel. 1821. An Inquiry into Those Principles Respecting the Nature of Demand and the Necessity of Consumption Lately Advocated by Mr. Malthus, R. Hunter, London.Google Scholar
Bailey, Samuel. 1825. A Critical Dissertation on the Nature, Measure and Causes of Value, R. Hunter, London.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1970. Economic Dynamics, 3d ed., Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Brewer, A. A. 1988. “Edward West and the Classical Theory of Distribution and Growth,” Economica, 55, November, 505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairnes, J. E. 1874. Some Leading Principles of Political Economy, Macmillan and Company, London.Google Scholar
Chalmers, T. 1832. On Political Economy, William Collins, Glasgow.Google Scholar
De Marchi, N. and Sturges, R. P.. 1973. “Malthus and Ricardo's Inductivist Critics,” Economica 40, no. 4, November, 379–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. 1897 [1844]. “The Logic of Political Economy,” in Masson, D., ed., Political Economy and Politics, A&C Black, London, 118–294.Google Scholar
Fenn, R. A. 1991. Textbook for Utilitarians, James Mill's Articles in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Robert A. Fenn, Toronto.Google Scholar
Fetter, F. W. 1980. The Economist in Parliament, Duke University Press, Durham.Google Scholar
Halévy, Elie. 1955 [1928]. The Growth of Philosophical Radicalism, trans. Mary Morris, Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1979. The Economics of David Ricardo, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1995. Ricardo The New View, Collected Essays I, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1998. The Economics of Thomas Robert Malthus, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1862. “Brief Account of a General Mathematical Theory of Political Economy,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 29, part 2, 282–87.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1977. Papers and Correspondence, vol. 6: Lectures on Political Economy 1875–1876, ed. Black, R. D. C., Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard. 1831. An Essay on the Distribution of Wealth, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Longfield, Mountifort. 1834. Lectures on Political Economy, Richard Milliken and Son, London.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1815. An Inquiry into the Nature and Progress of Rent and the Principles by which it is Regulated, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1817. Essay on Population, 5th ed., 3 vols., John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1820. Principles of Political Economy, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1823. The Measure of Value Stated and Illustrated, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1836. Principles of Political Economy, 2d ed., William Pickering, London.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics, 8th ed., Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1823. “Political Economy,” Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, April, 6, part 1, 2–64.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1825. The Principles of Political Economy, W. Tait, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1818. “Colony,” in Fenn, ed., 1991, 117–68.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1821. Elements of Political Economy, Baldwin, Cradock and Joy, London.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1824. Elements of Political Economy, 2d. ed., Baldwin, Cradock and Joy, London.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1826. Elements of Political Economy, 3d ed., Baldwin, London.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1965 [1848]. Collective Works, ed. Robson, J. M., University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. and Darnell, A. C.. 1982. Authorship Puzzles in the History of Economics, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, S. 1990. “The Population Mechanism in W. S. Jevons' Applied Economics,” The Manchester School, 58, March, 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1951–1973. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. Sraffa, P., 11 vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1978. “The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy,” Journal of Economic Literature, 16, December, 1415–34.Google Scholar
Senior, Nassau. 1830. Three Lectures on the Cost of Obtaining Money, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Senior, Nassau. 1836. Outline of the Science of Political Economy, W. Clowes and Sons, London.Google Scholar
Senior, Nassau. 1852. Four Introductory Lectures on Political Economy, Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1981. “Review of Hollander 1979,” Journal of Economic Literature, 19, March, 100–102.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1982. The Economist as Preacher and Other Essays, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1990. “Ricardo or Hollander?” Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 4, 765–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrens, R. 1815. An Essay on the External Corn Trade, J. Hatchard, London.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1820. An Essay on the External Corn Trade, 2d ed., J. Hatchard, London.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1821. An Essay on the Production of Wealth, Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown, London.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1826. An Essay on the External Corn Trade, 3d ed., Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1829. An Essay on the External Corn Trade, A New Edition, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1834. On Wages and Combination, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown. Green and Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Turgot, A. R. J. 1767 [1844] “Observations sur le mémoire de M. de Saint-Peravy,” in Daire, E. and Dussard, H., eds., Oeuvres de Turgot, Guillaumin, Paris, I, 418–33.Google Scholar
Walras, Auguste. 1849. Théorie de la richesse sociale, in Auguste et Léon Walras: Œuvres economiques complètes,2, Economica, Paris.Google Scholar
Walras, Léon. 1926. Elements of Pure Economics, translated by W. Jaffé, George Allen & Unwin, London, [1874] 1954.Google Scholar
West, Edward. 1815. Essay on the Application of Capital to Land, T. Underwood, London.Google Scholar
West, Edward. 1826. Price of Corn and Wages of Labour, J. Hatchard, London.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. 1831. Mathematical Exposition of Some of the Leading Doctrines in Mr. Ricardo's “Principles of Political Economy and Taxation,” J. Smith, Cambridge.Google Scholar