Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:32:26.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mobs and semitrees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

T. B. Muenzenberger
Affiliation:
Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, U.S.A.University of Wyoming and University of Houston, U.S.A.
R. E. Smithson
Affiliation:
Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, U.S.A.University of Wyoming and University of Houston, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In (1957) Ward characterized trees as being certain compact idempotent commutative monotone mobs. The purpose of the present note is to obtain a similar characterization for the semitrees as studied by Muenzenberger and Smithson (1973, 1975).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1976

References

Cohen, H. (1974), ‘Compact connected semilattices without the fixed point property’, Semigroup Forum 7, 375379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muenzenberger, T. B. and Smithson, R. E. (1973), ‘Fixed point structures’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 184, 153173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muenzenberger, T. B. and Smithson, R. E. (1974), ‘Refluent multifunctions on semitrees’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 44, 189195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muenzenberger, T. B. and Smithson, R. E. (1975). ‘The structure of nested spaces’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 201, 5787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, L. E. Jr (1957), ‘Mobs, trees and fixed points’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8, 798804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolk, E. S. (1958), ‘Order-compatible topologies on a partially ordered set’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 9, 524529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar