Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:31:05.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Permissible Promise-Making Under Uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2019

ALIDA LIBERMAN*
Affiliation:
SOUTHERN METHODIST [email protected]

Abstract

I outline four conditions on permissible promise-making: the promise must be for a morally permissible end, must not be deceptive, must be in good faith, and must involve a realistic assessment of oneself. I then address whether promises that you are uncertain you can keep can meet these four criteria, with a focus on campaign promises as an illustrative example. I argue that uncertain promises can meet the first two criteria, but that whether they can meet the second two depends on the source of the promisor's uncertainty. External uncertainty stemming from outside factors is unproblematic, but internal uncertainty stemming from the promisor's doubts about her own strength leads to promises that are in bad faith or unrealistic. I conclude that campaign promises are often subject to internal uncertainty and are therefore morally impermissible to make, all else being equal.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to Joshua Crabill, Berislav Marušić, and Carolyn McLeod for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Thanks also to audiences at the University of Richmond and the University of Indianapolis in 2016, to two anonymous referees for this journal, and to my fellow 2015–2016 postdocs at the Rotman Institute of Philosophy at the University of Western Ontario (Tommaso Bruni, Lucas Dunlap, Alkistis Elliott-Graves, Robert Foley, Elina Pechlivanidi, and Catherine Stinson), all of whom provided me with valuable feedback as I began developing these ideas.

References

Austin, J. L. (1962) How to Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
D'Cruz, Jason, and Kalef, Justin. (2015) ‘Promising to Try’. Ethics, 125, 797806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Daniel, and Southwood, Nicholas. (2011) ‘Promises and Trust’. In Sheinman, Hanoch (ed.), Promises and Agreements (Oxford, Oxford University Press), 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertken, Jan, and Kiesewetter, Benjamin. (2017) ‘The Right and the Wrong Kind of Reasons’. Philosophy Compass, 12, e12412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, Richard. (2009) Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Alida. (2015) ‘The Mental States First Theory of Promising’. Phd diss., University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Liberman, Alida. (n.d.) ‘For Better or For Worse: When Are Uncertain Wedding Vows Permissible?’Google Scholar
Marušić, Berislav. (2016) ‘What's Wrong With Promising to Try?Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 97, 249–56.Google Scholar
Owens, David. (2008) ‘Promising Without Intending’. Journal of Philosophy. 105, 737–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, David. (2012) Shaping the Normative Landscape. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1990) ‘Promises and Practices’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19, 199226.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1998) What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana. (2011) ‘Immoral, Conflicting, and Redundant Promises’. In Wallace, R. Jay, Kumar, Rahul, and Freeman, Samuel (eds.), Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shpall, Sam. (2014) ‘Moral and Rational Commitment’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88, 146–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary. (2009) ‘Promises, Reasons, and Normative Powers’. In Sobel, David and Wall, Steven (eds.), Reasons for Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar