Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:08:21.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What's Wrong with Unhelpful Comments? Conversational Helpfulness and Unhelpfulness and Why They Matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2022

SETH ROBERTSON Open the ORCID record for SETH ROBERTSON [Opens in a new window]
SETH ROBERTSON*
Affiliation:
HARVARD UNIVERSITY [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is common to criticize certain comments as ‘unhelpful’. This criticism is richer than it might first appear. In this paper, I sketch an account of conversational helpfulness and unhelpfulness, the reasons why they matter, and the utility of calling out comments as helpful or unhelpful. First, some unhelpful comments are or easily could be demoralizing for proponents of projects, and criticizing them as such can diminish, deflect, or defend against that demoralization. Second, some unhelpful comments redirect or derail conversations away from their projects and criticizing comments as unhelpful can steer conversations back. Third, some unhelpful comments are made out of a lack of epistemic effort and criticizing them as such can help maintain epistemic standards, standards of respect for other people and their projects, and can ensure that such comments do not receive more attention and consideration than they deserve.

Keywords

virtue epistemologyvirtue ethicssocial epistemologyethicshelpfulness
Type
Article
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Fall 2022 , pp. 512 - 530
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Philosophical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper benefited tremendously from comments from Wayne Riggs, Amy Olberding, Zoë Johnson King, David Gray Grant, and Meica Magnani, and from conversations with Nancy Snow, Catherine Elgin (who suggested several of the cases discussed in this paper), and Emilio Mora. The reviewers at the Journal of the American Philosophical Association for this piece were exemplary in their feedback and suggestions, and I am deeply grateful for their comments.

References

Abramson, K. (2014) ‘Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting’. Ethics, 28, 1–30.Google Scholar
Alcoff, L. M. (2007) ‘Epistemologies of Ignorance: Three Types’. In Sullivan, S. and Tuana, N. (eds.), Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. (Albany: State University of New York Press), 39–58.Google Scholar
Bejan, T. M. (2017) Mere Civility. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674972728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, C. (2000) ‘The Virtue of Civility’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29, 251–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carel, H., and Györffy, G.. (2014) ‘Seen but Not Heard: Children and Epistemic Injustice’. Lancet, 384, 1256–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carel, H., and Kidd, I. J.. (2014) ‘Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare: A Philosophical Analysis’. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17, 529–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassam, Q. (2016) ‘Vice Epistemology’. The Monist, 99, 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, E. M. (2016) ‘The Boundaries of Manners: Ritual and Etiquette in Early Confucianism and Stohr's On Manners’. Dao, 15, 241–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, L. (2004) ‘The Power of Ignorance’. Philosophical Papers, 33, 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D. H. (1995) ‘Argument Is War…and War Is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for Argumentation’. Informal Logic, 17, 177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsa, A. J. (2015) ‘Modern Greatness of Soul in Hume and Smith’. Ergo, 2, 27–58.Google Scholar
Davies, B. (2000) ‘Grice's Cooperative Principle: Getting the Meaning Across’. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 1–26.Google Scholar
Dotson, K. (2011) ‘Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Smothering’. Hypatia, 26, 236–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, K. (2012) ‘A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression’. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, M. (2009) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goetze, T. S. (2018) ‘Hermeneutical Dissent and the Species of Hermeneutical Injustice’. Hypatia, 33, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govier, T. (1999) The Philosophy of Argument. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1989) Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, C. (2013) The Limits of Kindness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, K. (2019) ‘What Is Imposter Syndrome?’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 93, 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundleby, C. (2013) ‘Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries’. Informal Logic, 33, 238–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivy, V. (2017) ‘Allies Behaving Badly: Gaslighting as Epistemic Injustice’. In Kidd, I. J., Medina, J., and Pohlhaus, G. Jr. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (New York: Routledge), 167–74.Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. (2014) ‘Socrates on the Moral Mischief of Misology’. Argumentation, 28, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, M. (2003) ‘Aquinas and the Challenge of Aristotelian Magnanimity’. History of Political Thought, 24, 37–65.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. J., Medina, J., and Pohlhaus, G. Jr., eds. (2017) The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, K. (2006) ‘Li in the “Analects”: Training in Moral Competence and the Question of Flexibility’. Philosophy East and West, 56, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, R. (2018) ‘Blocking as Counter-Speech’. In Fogal, D., Harris, D. W., and Moss, M. (eds.), New Works on Speech Acts (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 144–64.Google Scholar
Lumsden, D. (2008) ‘Kinds of Conversational Cooperation’. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1896–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauthner, N. S. (1998) ‘“It's a Woman's Cry for Help”: A Relational Perspective on Postnatal Depression’. Feminism and Psychology, 8, 325–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, D. (2018) ‘Manners and the Moral Life’. In Harrison, T. and Walker, D. (eds.), The Theory and Practice of Virtue Education (New York: Routledge), 140–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, J. (2013) The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, J. (2017) ‘Varieties of Hermeneutical Injustice’. In Kidd, I. J., Medina, J., and Pohlhaus, G. Jr. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (New York: Routledge), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. B. (2018) ‘Generosity: A Preliminary Account of a Surprisingly Neglected Virtue’. Metaphilosophy, 49, 216–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. (2007) ‘White Ignorance’. In Sullivan, S. and Tuana, N. (eds.), Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press), 11–28.Google Scholar
Nguyen, C. T. (2018) ‘Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles’. Episteme, 1–21.Google Scholar
Nguyen, C.T. (2019) ‘Group-Strapping, Bubble, or Echo Chamber’. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 8, 31–37.Google Scholar
Olberding, A. (2015) ‘From Corpses to Courtesy: Xunzi and the Defense of Etiquette’. Journal of Value Inquiry, 49, 145–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olberding, A. (2016) ‘Etiquette: A Confucian Contribution to Moral Philosophy’. Ethics, 126, 422–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olberding, A. (2019) The Wrong of Rudeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, S. K. (2019) ‘What Should “Imposter Syndrome” Be?’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 93, 227–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlidou, T. (1991) ‘Cooperation and the Choice of Linguistic Means: Some Evidence from the Use of the Subjunctive in Modern Greek’. Journal of Pragmatics, 15, 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlhaus, G. Jr. (2011) ‘Wrongful Requests and Strategic Refusals to Understand’. In Grasswick, H. (ed.), Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge (New York: Springer), 223–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlhaus, G. Jr. (2012) ‘Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance’. Hypatia, 27, 715–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, P. (2010) ‘Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason’. Informal Logic, 30, 302–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, P. (2012) ‘When Philosophical Argumentation Impedes Social and Political Progress’. Journal of Social Philosophy, 43, 317–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkissian, H. (2010) ‘Confucius and the Effortless Life of Virtue’. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 27, 1–16.Google Scholar
Sherman, N. (2005) ‘Of Manners and Morals’. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53, 272–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, J. N. (1984) Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Spear, A. D. (2019) ‘Epistemic Dimensions of Gaslighting: Peer-Disagreement, Self-Trust, and Epistemic Injustice’. Inquiry, 1–24.Google Scholar
Stark, C. A. (2019) ‘Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Psychological Oppression’. The Monist, 102, 221–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohr, K. (2012) On Manners. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taillard, M.-O. (2004) ‘Adaptive Persuasion’. Working Papers in Linguistics, 247–63.Google Scholar
Wanderer, J. (2017) ‘Varieties of Testimonial Injustice’. In Kidd, I. J., Medina, J., and Pohlhaus, G. Jr. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (New York: Routledge), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, L. (2015) ‘What Is Inquisitiveness’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 273–88.Google Scholar
Watson, L. (2018) ‘Educating for Good Questioning: A Tool for Intellectual Virtues Education’. Acta Analytica, 33, 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. T. (2016) ‘Modesty as Kindness’. Ratio, 29, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., and Sperber, D. (1981) ‘On Grice's Theory of Conversation’. In Werth, P. (ed.), Conversation and Discourse (London: Croom Helm), 155–78.Google Scholar