Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:22:18.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral Responsibility Ain't Just in the Head

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2015

MICHELLE CIURRIA
MICHELLE CIURRIA*
Affiliation:
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In this paper, I dispute what I call psychological internalism about moral responsibility, which comprises most classic accounts as well as newer neurobiological ones, and I defend psychological externalism about moral responsibility instead. According to psychological internalism, an agent's moral responsibility is determined solely or primarily by her intentional states. I argue that psychological internalism is empirically challenged by recent findings in social psychology and cognitive science. In light of the empirical evidence, I contend that moral responsibility depends on historical and environmental factors to a much greater degree than previously appreciated. Thus, moral responsibility is not just in the head: indeed, it is much less in the head than typically assumed.

Keywords

moral responsibilitypsychological internalismpsychological externalismmoral psychologyimplicit bias
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , Winter 2015 , pp. 601 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateson, M., Nettle, D., and Roberts, G.. (2006) ‘Cues of Being Watched Enhance Cooperation in a Real-World Setting’. Biology Letters, 2, 412–14.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S.. (2004) ‘Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination’. The American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.Google Scholar
Blair, I., Ma, J., and Lenton, A.. (2001) ‘Imagining Stereotypes Away: The Moderation of Implicit Stereotypes through Mental Imagery’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828–41.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment. 2d ed.New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Burnham, T. C., and Hare, B.. (2007) ‘Engineering Human Cooperation: Does Involuntary Neural Activation Increase Public Goods Cooperation?’ Human Nature, 18, 88–108.Google Scholar
CAMH Newsletter. (2012) http://www.camh.ca/en/hospital/about_camh/newsroom/news_releas_es_media_advisories_and_backgrounders/current_year/Pages/What's-the-best-way-to-treat-problem-alcohol-use.aspx; accessed September 2, 2015.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2012) ‘Moral Responsibility and Consciousness’. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 9, 200–28.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2010) ‘Introspection: Divided and Partly Eliminated’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80, 76–111.Google Scholar
Cartwright, W. (2006) ‘Reasons and Selves: Two Accounts of Responsibility in Theory and Practice’. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 13, 143–55.Google Scholar
Ciurria, M. (2014) ‘Moral Responsibility: Justifying Strawson and the Excuse of Peculiarly Unfortunate Formative Circumstances’. Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 17, 545–57.Google Scholar
Ciurria, M. (2013) ‘Situationism, Moral Responsibility, and Blame’. Philosophia, 41, 179–93.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, N., and Greenwald, A.. (2001) ‘On the Malleability of Automatic Attitudes: Combating Automatic Prejudice with Images of Admired and Disliked Individuals’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800–14.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1980) Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2015) Talking to Ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, D., and Bateson, M.. (2011) ‘Effects of Eye Images on Everyday Cooperative Behavior: A Field Experiment’. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 172–78.Google Scholar
Faraci, D., and Shoemaker, D.. (2010) ‘Insanity, Deep Selves, & Moral Responsibility’. Review of Philosophy & Psychology, 1, 319–33.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M. (2006) My Way: Essays on Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1971) ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’. In Watson, G. (ed.), Free Will, 2d ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 322–36.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1969) ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’. In Watson, G. (ed.), Free Will, 2d ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 167–76.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. (2005) The Ethical Brain: The Science of Our Moral Decisions. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Haley, K., and Fessler, D. M. T.. (2005) ‘Nobody's Watching? Subtle Cues Affect Generosity in an Anonymous Economic Game’. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245–56.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1999) ‘Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99, 315–31.Google Scholar
Hildyard, K. L., and Wolfe, D. A.. (2002) ‘Child Neglect: Developmental Issues and Outcomes’. Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal, 26, 679–95.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2015) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Toronto: Anchor Canada.Google Scholar
Isaacs, T. (2011) Moral Responsibility in Collective Contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., Machery, E., and Mallon, R.. (2010) ‘Race and Racial Cognition’. In Doris, J. M. and The Moral Psychology Research Group (eds.), The Moral Psychology Handbook (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 111–46.Google Scholar
Levy, N. (2008) ‘Counterfactual Intervention and Agents' Capacities’. The Journal of Philosophy, 105, 223–39.Google Scholar
Levy, N. (2011) Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, N. (2014) Consciousness and Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza, S. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., and Amodia, P. M.. (2010) ‘Reducing the Expression of Implicit Stereotypes: Reflexive Control through Implementation Intentions’. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 512–33.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1993) ‘Social Justice and Universalism: In Defense of an Aristotelian Account of Human Functioning’. Modern Philology, 90 (supplement), 46–73.Google Scholar
Pelham, B. W., Mirenberg, M. C., and Jones, J. K.. (2002) ‘Why Susie Sells Seashells by the Seashore: Implicit Egotism and Major Life Decisions’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 469–87.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1963) ‘Freedom and Resentment’. In Watson, G. (ed.), Free Will, 2d ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 72–93.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. (1981) ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’. Science, 211, 453–58.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., and Cohen, G. L.. (2005) ‘Constructed Criteria: Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination’. Psychological Science, 16, 474–80.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. (2005) ‘The Trouble with Tracing’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 29, 269–91.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. (2013) Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (1999). ‘Addiction as Defect of the Will: Some Philosophical Reflections’. In Watson, G. (ed.), Free Will, 2d ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 424–52.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1987) ‘Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme’. In Shoeman, F. (ed.), Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 256–86.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. (1987) ‘Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility’. In Watson, G. (ed.), Free Will, 2d ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 372–87.Google Scholar