Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T13:22:33.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unification in intuitionistic logic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Silvio Ghilardi
Silvio Ghilardi*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Dell' Informazione, Universita ‘Degli’ Studi di Milano, Via Comelico 39/41, 20135 Milano, Italy E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that the variety of Heyting algebras has finitary unification type. We also show that the subvariety obtained by adding it De Morgan law is the biggest variety of Heyting algebras having unitary unification type. Proofs make essential use of suitable characterizations (both from the semantic and the syntactic side) of finitely presented projective algebras.

Keywords

E-unificationprojective Heyting algebrasexact formulasadmisssible inference rules
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 859 - 880
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Baader, F. and Siekmann, J. H., Unification theory, Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (Gabbay, D. M., Hogger, C. J., and Robinson, J. A., editors), Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 41–125.Google Scholar
[2] Balbes, R. and Horn, A., Injective and projective Heyting algebras, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 148 (1970), pp. 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] de Jongh, D., Formulas of one propositional variable in intuitionistic arithmetic, The L. E. J. Brouwer centenary symposium (Troelstra, A. and van Dalen, D., editors), North-Holland, 1982, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
[4] de Jongh, D. and Visser, A., Embeddings of Heyting algebras, Logic: from foundations to applications (Hodges, W., Hyland, M., Steinhorn, C., and Truss, J., editors), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996, pp. 187–213.Google Scholar
[5] de Jongh, D. and Chagrova, L. A., The decidability of dependency in intuitionistic propositional logic, this Journal, vol. 60 (1995), pp. 498–504.Google Scholar
[6] Fine, K., Logics containing K4, Part I, this Journal, vol. 34 (1974), pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
[7] Fine, K., Logics containing K4, Part II, this Journal, vol. 50 (1985), pp. 619–651.Google Scholar
[8] Gabbay, D. M., Semantical investigations in Heyting intuitionistic logic, Sinthese Library, no. 148, Reidel, 1981.Google Scholar
[9] Ghilardi, S., E-unification in some varieties of Heyting algebras, in preparation.Google Scholar
[10] Ghilardi, S., Free Heyting algebras as bi-Heyting algebras, Mathematical Reports of the Academy of Sciences of Canada, vol. XIV (1992), no. 6, pp. 240–244.Google Scholar
[11 ] Ghilardi, S., Unification and projectivity in propositional logic, Quaderno n. 58/96, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università degli Studi, Milano, 1996.Google Scholar
[12] Ghilardi, S., Unification through projectivity, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 7 (1997), no. 6, pp. 733–752.Google Scholar
[13] Ghilardi, S. and Zawadowski, M., A sheaf representation and duality for finitely presented Heyting algebras, this Journal, vol. 60 (1995), no. 3, pp. 911–939.Google Scholar
[14] Martin, U. and Nipkow, T., Boolean unification—the story so far, Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol. 7 (1989), pp. 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Pitts, A. M., On an interpretation of second order quantification in first order intuitionistic propositional logic, this Journal, vol. 57 (1992), no. 1, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
[16] Rybakov, V. V., Equations in a free topoboolean algebra and substitution problem, Soviet Math, Dokl., vol. 33 (1986), no. 2, pp. 428–431.Google Scholar
[17] Rybakov, V. V., Rules of inference with parameters for intuitionistic logic, this Journal, vol. 57 (1992), no. 3, pp. 912–923.Google Scholar
[18] Rybakov, V. V., The universal theory of the free pseudo-Boolean algebra in extended signature, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 131 (1992), no. 3, pp. 645–656.Google Scholar
[19] Siekmann, J., Unification theory, Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol. 7 (1989), pp. 207–274.Google Scholar
[20] Snyder, W., A proof theory for general unification, Birkhäuser, 1991.Google Scholar
[21] Urquhart, A., Free Heyting algebras, Algebra Universalis, vol. 3 (1973), pp. 94–97.Google Scholar
[22] van Dalen, D., Intuitionistic logic, Handbook of philosophical logic (Gabbay, and Günther, , editors), vol. III, Reidel, 1986, pp. 225–339.Google Scholar
[23] Visser, A., Bisimulations, model descriptions and propositional quantifiers, Logic Group Preprint Series 161, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 1996.Google Scholar