Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T11:36:43.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON THE COFINALITY OF THE LEAST $\lambda $-STRONGLY COMPACT CARDINAL

Part of: Set theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2023

ZHIXING YOU
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA 08001, BARCELONA, SPAIN INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SYSTEMS SCIENCE CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, BEIJING 100190 PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA and SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES BEIJING 100049, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Current address: DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY RAMAT-GAN 5290002, ISRAEL E-mail: [email protected]
JIACHEN YUAN*
Affiliation:
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA NORWICH NR4 7TJ, UK Current address: SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS LEEDS LS2 9JT, UK

Abstract

In this paper, we characterize the possible cofinalities of the least $\lambda $-strongly compact cardinal. We show that, on the one hand, for any regular cardinal, $\delta $, that carries a $\lambda $-complete uniform ultrafilter, it is consistent, relative to the existence of a supercompact cardinal above $\delta $, that the least $\lambda $-strongly compact cardinal has cofinality $\delta $. On the other hand, provably the cofinality of the least $\lambda $-strongly compact cardinal always carries a $\lambda $-complete uniform ultrafilter.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagaria, J. and Magidor, M., On ${\omega}_1$ -strongly compact cardinals, this Journal, vol. 79 (2014), no. 1, pp. 268–278.Google Scholar
Bagaria, J. and Magidor, M., Group radicals and strongly compact cardinals . Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , vol. 366 (2014), no. 4, pp. 18571877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J., Iterated forcing and elementary embeddings, Handbook of Set Theory, vols. 1–3 (Foreman, M. and Kanamori, A., editors), Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 775883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. and Schimmerling, E., Indexed squares . Israel Journal of Mathematics , vol. 131 (2002), pp. 6199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. and Woodin, H., Generalised Prikry forcings. Preprint.Google Scholar
Gitik, M., Prikry-type forcing , Handbook of Set Theory, vols. 1–3 (Foreman, M. and Kanamori, A., editors), Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 13511447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitik, M., On $\sigma$ -complete uniform ultrafilters, 2020. Available at http://www.math.tau.ac.il/gitik/scuu4-20.pdf.Google Scholar
Goldberg, G., The uniqueness of elementary embeddings. Preprint, 2021, arxiv:2103.13961.Google Scholar
Jech, T., Set Theory , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2003.Google Scholar
Kanamori, A., The Higher Infinite: Large Cardinals in Set Theory from Their Beginnings, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 1994.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W., How Weak Is a Closed Unbounded Ultrafilter? Logic Colloquium ’80 (Prague, 1980) , Studies in Logic Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 108, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 209230.Google Scholar
Radin, L. B., Adding closed cofinal sequences to large cardinals . Annals of Mathematical Logic , vol. 22 (1982), pp. 243261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usuba, T., A note on $\delta$ -strongly compact cardinals . Topology and its Applications , vol. 301 (2020), p. 107538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar