Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:22:37.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FIRST-ORDER RECOGNIZABILITY IN FINITE AND PSEUDOFINITE GROUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2020

YVES CORNULIER
Affiliation:
CNRS AND UNIV LYON UNIV CLAUDE BERNARD LYON 1 INSTITUT CAMILLE JORDAN 43 BLVD DU 11 NOVEMBRE 1918 69622VILLEURBANNE, FRANCEE-mail: [email protected]
JOHN S. WILSON
Affiliation:
CHRIST’S COLLEGECAMBRIDGE CB2 3BU, UK and MATHEMATISCHES INSTITUT UNIVERSITÄT LEIPZIGLEIPZIG, GERMANYE-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

It is known that there exists a first-order sentence that holds in a finite group if and only if the group is soluble. Here it is shown that the corresponding statements with ‘solubility’ replaced by ‘nilpotence’ and ‘perfectness’, among others, are false.

These facts present difficulties for the study of pseudofinite groups. However, a very weak form of Frattini’s theorem on the nilpotence of the Frattini subgroup of a finite group is proved for pseudofinite groups.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Association for Symbolic Logic 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ax, J., The elementary theory of finite fields . Annals of Mathematics, vol. 88 (1968), no. 2, 239271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, L. E., Linear Groups, with an Exposition of the Galois Field Theory, Teubner, Leipzig, Amsterdam, Germany, 1901.Google Scholar
Eklof, P. C., Ultraproducts for algebraists , Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1977, pp. 105137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felgner, U., Pseudo-endliche Gruppen , Proceedings of the 8th Easter Conference on Model Theory, Humboldt–Universität, Berlin, Germany, 1990, pp. 8296.Google Scholar
Frattini, G., Intorno alla generazione dei gruppi di operazioni . Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, vol. 1 (1885), no. 4, pp. 281285; 455–457.Google Scholar
Holt, D. F. and Plesken, W., Perfect Groups. Oxford Mathematical Monographs, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
Kimmerle, W., Lyons, R., Sandling, R., and Teague, D. N., Composition factors from the group ring and Artin’s theorem on orders of simple groups . Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 60 (1990), no. 3, pp. 89122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, D., Model theory of finite and pseudofinite groups . Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 57 (2018), pp. 159184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ould-Houcine, A. and Point, F., Alternatives for pseudofinite groups . Journal of Group Theory, vol. 16 (2013), pp. 461495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poizat, B., A Course in Model Theory: An Introduction to Contemporary Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoenfield, J., The Problem of Predicativity: Essays on the Foundations of Mathematics, Magnes Press, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 1961, pp. 132139.Google Scholar
Szmielew, W., Elementary properties of Abelian groups . Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 41 (1955), no. 2, pp. 203271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warfield, R. B., Nilpotent Groups , Lecture Notes in Math, vol. 513, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany–New York, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. S., Finite axiomatization of finite soluble groups . Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 74 (2006), no. 2, pp. 566582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. S., First-order characterization of the radical of a finite group, this Journal, vol. 74 (2009), 14291435.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. S., Components and minimal normal subgroups of finite and pseudofinite groups, this Journal, vol. 84 (2019), pp. 290300.Google Scholar