Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:23:19.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The bounded proper forcing axiom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Martin Goldstern  and
Saharon Shelah
Martin Goldstern
Affiliation:
Institut für Algebra und Diskrete Mathematik, Technische Universität Wien, A-1040 Wien, Austria, E-mail: [email protected]
Saharon Shelah
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The bounded proper forcing axiom BPFA is the statement that for any family of ℵ1 many maximal antichains of a proper forcing notion, each of size ℵ1, there is a directed set meeting all these antichains.

A regular cardinal κ is called ∑1-reflecting, if for any regular cardinal χ, for all formulas φ, “H(χ) ⊨ ‘φ’” implies “∃δ < κ, H(δ) ⊨ ‘φ’”.

We investigate several algebraic consequences of BPFA, and we show that the consistency strength of the bounded proper forcing axiom is exactly the existence of a ∑1-reflecting cardinal (which is less than the existence of a Mahlo cardinal).

We also show that the question of the existence of isomorphisms between two structures can be reduced to the question of rigidity of a structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 58 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[Ba 1]Baumgartner, James E., Applications of the proper forcing axiom, Handbook of set-theoretic topology (Kunen, K. and Vaughan, J. E., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 913–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ba 2]Baumgartner, James E., Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory (Mathias, A. R. D., editor), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 87, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
[Fu]Fuchino, Sakaé, On potential embedding and versions of Martin's axiom, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 33 (1992), pp. 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Mi]Mitchell, William, Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1972–1973), pp. 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sh 56]Shelah, Saharon, Refuting Ehrenfeucht conjecture on rigid models, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 25 (1976); [= Abraham Robinson Memorial Symposium, Yale, 1975], pp. 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sh 73]Shelah, Saharon, Models with second-order properties, II: Trees with no undefined branches, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 14 (1978), pp. 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sh b]Shelah, Saharon, Proper forcing, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 940, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sh f]Shelah, Saharon, Proper and improper forcing, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
[To]Todorcevic, Stevo, A note on the proper forcing axiom, Axiomatic set theory (Baumgartner, J.et al., editors), American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984, pp. 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar