Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:39:50.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Automorphism–invariant measures on ℵ0-categorical structures without the independence property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Douglas E. Ensley*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, PA 17257, USA, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We address the classification of the possible finitely-additive probability measures on the Boolean algebra of definable subsets of M which are invariant under the natural action of Aut(M). This pursuit requires a generalization of Shelah's forking formulas [8] to “essentially measure zero” sets and an application of Myer's “rank diagram” [5] of the Boolean algebra under consideration. The classification is completed for a large class of ℵ0-categorical structures without the independence property including those which are stable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Albert, M., Measures on the random graph, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 50 (1994), pp. 417429.Google Scholar
[2]Baldwin, J., Fundamentals of stability theory, Springer-Verlag, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Chang, C. C. and Keisler, H. J., Model theory, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1990.Google Scholar
[4]Ensley, D., Measures on ℵ0-categorical structures, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1993, Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
[5]Myers, D., Lindenbaum-tarski algebras, Handbook of Boolean algebras, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.Google Scholar
[6]Pillay, A., An introduction to stability theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar
[7]Shelah, S., Simple unstable theories, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 19 (1980), pp. 177203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Shelah, S., Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990, revised edition.Google Scholar
[9]Vaughn, J., A note on forking and normalization, Arch. math. Logik, vol. 26 (1987), pp. 165168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar