Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:02:46.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ordinal recursion, and a refinement of the extended Grzegorczyk hierarchy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

S. S. Wainer*
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, Leeds, England

Extract

It is well known that iteration of any number-theoretic function f, which grows at least exponentially, produces a new function f′ such that f is elementary-recursive in f′ (in the Csillag-Kalmar sense), but not conversely (since f′ majorizes every function elementary-recursive in f). This device was first used by Grzegorczyk [3] in the construction of a properly expanding hierarchy {ℰn: n = 0, 1, 2, …} which provided a classification of the primitive recursive functions. More recently it was shown in [7] how, by iterating at successor stages and diagonalizing over fundamental sequences at limit stages, the Grzegorczyk hierarchy can be extended through Cantor's second number-class. A problem which immediately arises is that of classifying all recursive functions, and an answer to this problem is to be found in the general results of Feferman [1]. These results show that although hierarchies of various types (including the above extensions of Grzegorczyk's hierarchy) can be produced, which range over initial segments of the constructive ordinals and which do provide complete classifications of the recursive functions, these cannot be regarded as classifications “from below”, since the method of assigning fundamental sequences at limit stages must be highly noneffective. We therefore adopt the more modest aim here (as in [7], [12], [14]) of characterising certain well-known (effectively generated) subclasses of the recursive functions, by means of hierarchies generated in a natural manner, “from below”.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Feferman, S., Classification of recursive functions by means of hierarchies, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 104 (1962), pp. 101122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Feferman, S., Systems of predicative analysis. II, this Journal, vol. 33 (1968), pp. 193220.Google Scholar
[3]Grzegorczyk, A., Some classes of recursive functions, Rozprawy Matematyczne, vol. 4, 1953.Google Scholar
[4]Hardy, G. H., A theorem concerning the infinite cardinal numbers, Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, vol. 35 (1904), pp. 8794.Google Scholar
[5]Kleene, S. C., Extension of an effectively generated class of functions by enumeration, Colloquium Mathematicum, vol. 6 (1958), pp. 6778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kreisel, G., On the interpretation of nonfinitist proofs. II, this Journal, vol. 17 (1952), pp. 4358.Google Scholar
[7]Löb, M. H. and Wainer, S. S., Hierarchies of number-theoretic functions. I, Archiv für matematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, vol. 13 (1970), pp. 3951; II, Archiv für matematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, vol. 13 (1970), pp. 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Péter, R., Recursive functions, Academic Press, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
[9]Robbin, J. W., Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J., 1965.Google Scholar
[10]Schwichtenberg, H., Eine Klassifikation der ∈0-rekursiven Funktionen, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 17 (1971), pp. 6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Tait, W. W., Nested recursion, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 143 (1961), pp. 236250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Wainer, S. S., A classification of the ordinal recursive functions, Archiv für matematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, vol. 13 (1970), pp. 136153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Wainer, S. S., Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Leeds, Leeds, 1969.Google Scholar
[14]Wainer, S. S., A subrecursive hierarchy over the predicative ordinals, Proceedings of the Conference in Mathematical Logic, Bedford College, London, 1970 (abstract to appear).Google Scholar