Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:23:32.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The order indiscernibles of divisible ordered abelian groups1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

David Rosenthal*
Affiliation:
Ithaca College, Ithaca, New York 14850

Extract

There has been much work in developing the interconnections between model theory and algebra. Here we look at a particular example, the divisible ordered abelian groups, and show how the indiscernibles are related to the algebraic structure. Now a divisible ordered abelian group is a model of Th (Q, +, 0, <) and so is linearly ordered by <. Thus the theory is unstable and has a large number of models. It is therefore unrealistic to expect that a simple condition will completely determine a model. Instead we would just like to obtain nice algebraic invariants.

Definition. A subset C of a divisible ordered abelian group is a set of (order) indiscernibles iff for every sequence of integers n1,…,nk and for every c1 < … < ck and d1 < … < dk in C

Note that this simplified form of indiscernibility is an immediate consequence of quantifier elimination for the theory. The above definition could be formulated in the language of +, 0, < but we have used subtraction as a matter of convenience. Similarly we may also use rational coefficients. Also note that a set of order indiscernibles is usually defined with respect to some external order. But in this case there are only two possibilities: the ordering inherited from or its reverse. So we will always assume that a set of order indiscernibles has the ordering inherited from . We may sometimes refer to a set of indiscernibles as a sequence of indiscernibles if we want to explicitly mention the ordering associated with the set.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The results in this paper primarily come from a chapter in the author's Ph.D. thesis [6] which was written with the valuable guidance of Professor H. J. Keisler.

References

REFERENCES

[1]Barwise, J. (editor), Handbook of mathematical logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
[2]Chang, C. C. and Keisler, H. J., Model theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.Google Scholar
[3]Ehrenfeucht, A. and Mostowski, A., Models of axiomatic theories admitting automorphisms, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 43 (1956), pp. 5068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fuchs, L., Partially ordered algebraic systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1963.Google Scholar
[5]Hahn, H., Über die nichtarchimedischen Grössensysteme, Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften ( Wien), Band 116, Abt. IIa (1907), pp. 601655.Google Scholar
[6]Rosenthal, D., The classification of the order indiscernibles of real closed fields and other theories, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc, 1981.Google Scholar
[7]Sacks, G. E., Saturated model theory, Benjamin, Reading, Mass., 1972.Google Scholar