Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T20:56:56.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Welfare Economics of Priority Area Policies*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Sally Holtermann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The priority area approach to problems such as urban deprivation has recently been criticized because of its alleged ineffectiveness and because the majority of the deprived live outside the priority areas. This paper argues that these criticisms do not constitute an adequate appraisal of the area approach, as they ignore some other and equally important considerations, in particular the economic aspects of the approach. One is the possibility of achieving resource cost saving through area action (thus making it possible to help more deprived people from a given level of resources). Another is the possibility of achieving a higher rate of take-up of special assistance. The paper discusses those attributes of utility functions and production functions that are relevant to the appraisal of area policies, and provides a framework that would allow a complete evaluation of the economic aspects of an area policy.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1978 , pp. 23 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Donnison, D., ‘Policies for Priority Areas’, journal of social Policy, 3:2 (1974), 127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Graham, P., ‘Are Action Areas a Mistake?’, Municipal and Public Services Journal, 5 07 1974, 809–11.Google Scholar

3 Townsend, P., ‘Area Deprivation Policies’, New Statesman, 6 08 1976, 168–71.Google Scholar

4 As in Holtermann, S. E., ‘Externalities and Public Goods’, Economica, 39 (1972), 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 This point is fully discussed in Culyer, A. J., Lavers, R. J. and Williams, A., ‘Social Indicators: Health’, in Nissel, M. (ed.), Social Trends, no. 2, HMSO, London, 1971, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar

6 Gray, J., ‘Positive Discrimination in Education’, Policy and Politics, 4 (1975), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Tender returns to the Department of the Environment, 1974.

8 See Graham, op. cit.

9 Rawls, After J., A Theory of Justice, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, London, 1972.Google Scholar

10 This rule will satisfy some other simple notions of equity, such as increasing the welfare of equally deprived people by the same amount.

11 Feldstein, M., ‘On the Theory of Tax Reform’, Journal of Public Economics, 6 (1976), 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 This rule will not necessarily satisfy the notion of equity in note 10, which could be added to rule (iii) as an additional requirement.

13 See Sen, A. K., On Economic Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, London, 1973Google Scholar; and Atkinson, A. B., ‘On the Measurement of Inequality’, Journal of Economic Theory, 2 (1970), 244–63.Google Scholar

14 Sen, A. K., ‘Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement’, Econometrica, 44 (1976), 219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Bator, F. M., ‘The Anatomy of Market Failure’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72 (1958), 351–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Holtermann, S. E., ‘Areas of Urban Deprivation’, in Thompson, E. I. (ed.), Social Trends, no. 6, HMSO, London, 1975, pp. 33–47.Google Scholar

17 Barnes, J. H. and Lucas, H., ‘Positive Discrimination in Education’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), Educational Priority, vol. 3, HMSO, London, 1975, pp. 237–89.Google Scholar

18 Townsend, op. cit.

19 See Community Development Project, Interproject Report, CDP Research and Intelligence Unit, London, 1973Google Scholar; and Townsend, op. cit.

20 See for example Evans, A. W., The Economics of Residential location, Macmillan, London, 1973Google Scholar; and Evans, A. W., ‘Economic Influences on Social Mix’, Urban Studies, 13 (1976), 247–60.Google Scholar

21 Gray, op. cit.

22 Barnes and Lucas, op. cit.