Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:13:46.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slote Morris Zoe, Rosenstrom Chang Linda, Dawson Sandra and Garside Pam (eds) (2006), Policy Futures for UK Health. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing. £35.00, pp.206, pbk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2007

IAN GREENER
IAN GREENER*
Affiliation:
Manchester Business School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 682 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burrows, R. and Nettleton, S. 2000, ‘Reflexive modernisation and the emergence of wired self-help’, in Burrows, R. and Pleace, N. (eds), Wired Welfare? Essays on the Rhetoric and Reality of e-Social Policy, Discussion paper, York: Centre For Housing Policy.Google Scholar
Burrows, R., Nettleton, S., Pleace, N., Loader, B. and Muncer, S. 2000, ‘Virtual community care? Social Policy and the emergence of computer mediated social support’, Information, Communication and Society, 3: 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dargie, C., Dawson, S. and Garside, P. (eds) 2000, Policy Futures for UK Health 2000 Report, London: Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
Dawson, S. and Saussman, C. (eds) 2005, Future Health Organisations and Systems, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Nettleton, S. and Burrows, R. 2003, ‘E-scaped medicine? Information, reflexivity and health’, Critical Social Policy, 23: 173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar