Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T10:51:19.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Values and Public Trust: Responses to Welfare State Reform in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

PETER TAYLOR-GOOBY  and
ANDREW WALLACE
PETER TAYLOR-GOOBY
Affiliation:
School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NF email: [email protected]
ANDREW WALLACE
Affiliation:
School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NF email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The welfare state faces a number of challenges. Recent reforms in the UK appear broadly successful in attaining targets and improving cost-efficiency, but are nonetheless confronted by public disquiet and unease. This article argues that one difficulty with the new directions in policy is that they rest on a particular and limited understanding of agency. Reformers tend to operate within a theoretical framework that understands behaviour as driven by individual and predominantly rational incentives and pays little attention to the expressive and normative aspects of social action. The problems that arise in these areas when a competitive market logic is applied in social provision tend not to be recognised. Such a logic may contradict established values of social care and commitment to user interests. A qualitative survey of 48 members of the general public is used to examine perceptions of and responses to the NHS reforms, and to show how public discourse in this area is at variance with the instrumental and individual assumptions of policy-makers. The result is that the reform programme damages the legitimacy of the service and that those responsible for the new policies fail to recognise that the individual instrumental agenda is eroding public trust.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 401 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, J. and Alvarez-Rosette, A. (2005), ‘Public responses to NHS reform’, in Park, A., Curtice, J., Thomson, K., Jarvis, L. and Bromley, C. (eds.), British Social Attitudes, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Atman, C., Bostrom, A., Fischoff, B. and Morgan, M. (1994), ‘Designing risk communications and correcting mental models of hazardous processes’, Risk Analysis, 14: 5, 779–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Axelrod, R. (1981), ‘The evolution of cooperation’, Science, 211: 4489, 1390–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baggott, R. (2007), Understanding Health Care, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Bevan, G. and Hood, C. (2006a), ‘Have targets improved performance in the English NHS?’, British Medical Journal, 332: 419–22.Google Scholar
Bevan, G. and Hood, C. (2006b), ‘What's measured is what matters’, Public Administration, 84: 3, 517–38.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Calnan, M. and Rowe, R. (2005), ‘Trust relations in the NHS’, SCARR Trust Conference, London, 12 December.Google Scholar
Cook, K. and Levi, M. (1990), The Limits of Rationality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cvetkovich, G. and Earle, T. (1997), ‘Culture, cosmopolitanism and risk management’, Risk Analysis, 17: 1, 55.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (1988), ‘Trust as a commodity’, in Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Denney, D. (2005), Risk and Society, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. (2002), ‘Incentives and organisations in the public sector’, Journal of Human Resources, 37: 696–727.Google Scholar
Eldridge, J., Kitzinger, J. and Williams, K. (1997), The Mass Media and Power in Modern Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellison, N. and Castles, F. (2006), The Welfare State Reader, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Enthoven, A. (2002), Introducing Market Forces into Health Care, London: Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000), ‘Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14: 3, 159–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, B. (2002), Counting the Smiles, London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Flynn, N. (2007), Public Sector Management, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Frey, B. (2000), ‘Motivation and human behaviour’, in Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.), Risk, Trust and Welfare, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. (1988), Trust, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1993), New Rules of Sociological Method, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action, translated by McCarthy, T., Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2002), Trust and Trustworthiness, New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Hargreaves-Heap, S., Hollis, M., Lyons, B., Sugden, R. and Weale, A. (1992), Choice, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hart, H. (1961), The Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hills, J. and Stewart, K. (eds.) (2005), A More Equal Society? New Labour, Poverty, Inequality and Exclusion, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoggett, P. (2001), ‘Agency, rationality and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 30: 1, 37–56.Google Scholar
Hoggett, P., Mayo, M. and Miller, C. (2006), ‘Private passions, the public good and public service reform’, Social Policy and Administration, 40: 7, 758–73.Google Scholar
Holmwood, J. (2005), ‘Functionalism and its critics’, in Harrington, A. (ed.), Modern Social Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
House of Commons Health Committee (2006), press release 24 July.Google Scholar
Hovland, C., Janis, I. and Kelley, H. (1953), Communication and Persuasion, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. (2001), Development and Crisis of the Welfare State, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ipsos Mori (2007), Government Delivery Index, http://www.ipsos-mori.com/political/gdi.shtml, accessed 9 November 2007Google Scholar
Jaeger, C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. and Webler, T. (2001), Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.) (1982), Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King's Fund (2005, modified 2007), ‘Independent Audit of the NHS under New Labour 1997–2005’, Briefing Paper 23.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2003), Motivation, Choice and Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2007), The Other Invisible Hand, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, P. (2006), ‘Public service productivity: health’, ONS, February, http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/nojournal/PublicServiceProductivityHealth(27_2_06).pdf, accessed 19 November 2007.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995), Social Systems, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mau, S. and Veghte, B. (2007), Social Justice, Legitimacy and the Welfare State, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Metlay, D. (1999), ‘Institutional trust and confidence’, in Cvetkovich, G. T. and Löfstedt, R.. (eds.), Social Trust and the Management of Risk, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Moellering, G. (2006), Trust, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (ed.) (1999), Critical Citizens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Offer, J. (2006), ‘Social theory and agency in social policy since 1830’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 2, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Walker, J. (eds.) (2002), Trust and Reciprocity, London: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1951), The Social System, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Petts, J., Horlick-Jones, T. and Murdock, G. (2001), Social Amplification of Risk, Sudbury: HSE Books.Google Scholar
Picker (2007), Is the NHS Becoming More Patient-Centred?, London: Picker Institute.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plant, R. (1991), Modern Political Thought, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944), The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Preker, A. and Harding, A. (2002), Innovations in Health Service Delivery, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Prime Minister's Strategy Unit (PMSU) (2006), The UK Government's Approach to Public Sector Reform, London: PMSU.Google Scholar
Propper, C., Wilson, D. and Burgess, S. (2006), ‘Extending choice in English health care’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 4, 537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. (2005), Social Traps and the Problem of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, H. (2000), The Problem of Trust, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1978), ‘Rationality as process and as product of thought’, American Economic Review, 68: 1–16.Google Scholar
Sun (2006a), ‘Wasted decade’, 12 October.Google Scholar
Sun (2006b), ‘Our NHS and the truth which dare not speak its name’, 14 April.Google Scholar
Sun (2006c), ‘MRSA’, 24 February.Google Scholar
Sztompka, P. (1998), Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (2007), ‘The impact of the specialist schools programme on exam results’, Lancaster University Management School Working Paper.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. (1970), The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Todd, P. and Gigerenzer, G. (2003), ‘Bounding rationality to the world’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 24: 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, P. and Walker, D. (2005), For Better or Worse?, London: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Treasury (2007), Comprehensive Spending Review: Meeting the Aspirations of the British People, Cm 7227, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978), Economy and Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar