Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:22:32.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An assessment of the accuracy of tattoo marks in aligning treatment fields for pelvic radiotherapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2006

J. Mowbray
Affiliation:
Radiotherapy Department
D. E. Bonnett
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK

Abstract

Electronic portal imaging (EPI) has been used in the assessment of the accuracy of radiotherapy treatments in the pelvis. The daily reproducibility of any treatment is primarily dependent on the effectiveness of the set-up method. Treatments of radical planned volumes within the pelvis are subject to field placement errors (FPE) which could potentially compromise the successful outcome of radiotherapy treatment. Increasing use of shaped treatment fields to limit the dose delivered to surrounding normal tissues has prompted a more detailed examination of set-up methods.

Within the radiotherapy department at the Leicester Royal Infirmary it was noted that tattooed marks on the anterior or posterior and the lateral skin surface, marked at simulation, could not always be aligned for daily radiotherapy treatment.

An assessment of the relative merit of the anterior/posterior or the lateral tattoos in determining the isocentre position in the superior-inferior (cranio-caudal) plane is presented. This study showed that changes in the use of tattoo marks during set-up would have reduced the incidence of FPE >5 mm for a small sample group of patients. Implementation of changes in clinical practice, or research using a larger sample group is now needed to verify any improvement in accuracy using a modified treatment set-up technique.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)