Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:30:30.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-National Sources of Regulatory Policymaking in Europe and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Giandomenico Majone
Affiliation:
Public Policy, European University Institute, Florence

Abstract

Because events occur too fast and ideas mature too slowly for responses to be designed anew for each pressing problem, policy innovation often relies on pre-existing models, foreign or domestic. This seems to be especially true for regulatory policymaking, since public regulation is typically introduced in conditions of crisis. In this paper we examine several cases of policy innovation in the area of economic and social regulation where the influence of foreign models is quite clear: the development of competition policy in Europe in the 1950s, the growth of European Community regulation, and the impact of the American deregulation movement on the telecommunications policies of different European countries. The analysis shows that while utilization of preexisting models is a common feature of policy innovation, such models are not literally translated into current policy. More or less extensive adaptations to a particular political, institutional and economic context are usually required. We also identify two distinct ways – push or pull – in which foreign models can affect domestic policy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alchian, Armen A. (1977). ‘Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory’, in Alchian, A. A., Economic Forces at Work, Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Press, 1535.Google Scholar
Allen, David (1983). ‘Managing the Common Market: The Community Competition Policy’, in Wallace, et al. (eds.), 1983, 209236.Google Scholar
Berghahn, Volker R. (1986). The Americanization of West German Industry, 1945–1973. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Blankart, Charles B. and Knieps, Günther (1989). ‘What Can We Learn from Comparative Institutional Analysis? The Case of Telecommunications’, Kyklos, 42: 2, 579598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickman, Ronald, Jasanoff, Sheila and Ilgen, Thomas (1985). Controlling Chemicals. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1985). Completing the Internal Market. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Cowhey, Peter F. (1990). ‘Telecommunications’ in Hufbaucr, (ed.), 1990, 159224.Google Scholar
Dehousse, Renaud (1988). ’Completing the Internal Market: Institutional Constraints and Challenges’ In: Bieber, Roland et al. (eds.), 1992: One European Market? Baden-Baden: Nomos, 311336.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha and Quirk, Paul J. (1985). The Politics of Deregulation, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Elliott, Donald, Ackerman, Bruce A., Millian, John C. (1985). ‘Toward a Theory of Statutory Evolution: The Federalization of Environmental Law’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1:2, 313340.Google Scholar
Golembe, Carter H. and Holland, David S. (1990). ‘Banking and Securities’ in Hufbauer, 1990, 65118.Google Scholar
Haigh, Nigel (1984). EEC Environmental Law and Britain. London: Environmental Data Services, Ltd.Google Scholar
Hancher, Leigh and Moran, Michael (1989). ‘Organizing Regulatory Space’, in Hancher, L. and Moran, M. (eds.), Capitalism, Culture and Economic Regulation, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 271299.Google Scholar
Hardach, Karl (1980). The Political Economy of Germany in the Twentieth Century, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberg, George (1991). ‘Sleeping with an Elephant: The American Influence on Canadian Environmental Regulation’, Journal of Public Policy, 11:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde (ed.) (1990). Europe 1992 – An American Perspective, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hulsink, Willem (1990). ‘The Public-Private Debate: Regulatory Reform of Telecommunications in the European Community 1980–1990’, Working Paper, Florence, Italy: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Peter (1988). Mrs. Thatcher's Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufer, Erich (1990). ‘The Regulation of New Product Development in the Drug Industry’, in Majone, (ed.) 1990, 153175.Google Scholar
Kay, John and Vickers, John (1990). ‘Regulatory Reform: An Appraisal’, in Majone, (ed.) 1990,223251.Google Scholar
Knieps, Günther (1990). ‘Deregulation in Europe: Telecommunications and Transportation’ in Majone, (ed.) 1990, 72100.Google Scholar
Koebel, Philippe (1990). ‘Deregulation of the Telecommunications Sector: A Movement in Line with Recent Technological Advances’ in Majone, (ed.) 1990, 110123.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard (1989). ‘Marktreformstrategien bei alternierender Parteiregierung’ in Ellwein, Thomas et al. (eds.), Jahrbuch zur Slants- una Verwallungswissenschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1545.Google Scholar
Letwin, William (1965). Law and Economic Policy in America, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Maier, Charles (1978). ‘The Politics of Productivity: Foundations of American International Economic Policy after World War II’, in Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), Between Power and Plenty, Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2349.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico (1989a). ‘Regulating Europe: Problems and Prospects’ in Ellweinet, Thomas et al. (eds.), Jahrbuch zur Stoats- und Verwallungswissenschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 159178.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico (1989b). Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico (ed.) (1990). Deregulation or Re-regulation? Regulatory Reform in Europe and The United States. London: Francis Pinter.Google Scholar
Mott, Richard N. (1990) Federal-State Relations in U.S. Environmental Law: Implications for the European Community, European Policy Unit of the European University Institute, Working Paper no. 90/2.Google Scholar
Prosser, Tony (1989). Regulation of Privatized Enterprises: Institutions and Procedures’, in Hancher, L. and Moran, M. (eds.), Capitalism, Culture and Economic Regulation, 135165.Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Eckhart and Stewart, Richard (1985). Environmental Protection Policy. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, forthcoming: Lesson Drawing Across Time and Space, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip (1985). ‘Focusing Organizational Research on Regulation’, in Noll, Roger G. (ed.),Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 363367.Google Scholar
Veljanovski, Cento, (1987). Selling the State, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Vipod, P. A. (1989). ‘Banking Regulation in Europe: European Community and British Banking Regulation in the Context of Change Within the Financial Services Industry’, Panel on Deregulation, Reregulation and the International Dimension, Paris: ECPR Joint Sessions.Google Scholar
Wallace, Helen, Wallace, W., Webb, C. (eds.) (1983). Policy-Making in the European Community, London and New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar