Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:52:25.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Big Cabinets, Big Governments? Grand Coalitions and Public Policy in the German Laender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2009

Aline Schniewind ,
Markus Freitag  and
Adrian Vatter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The inauguration of Germany's grand coalition of Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) and the Social Democrats (SPD) raises questions about the public policy performance of a coalition of ideological opposite. This paper turns attention to influence of coalition governments on the size of government in the German Laender from 1992 to 2005. We investigate whether grand coalitions at the sub-national level in Germany systematically affect government spending for education (including cultural affairs) and internal security. The article argues that the effects of grand coalitions on the size of the public sector are moderated by partisan politics but sometimes in unexpected ways. For example, government spending in the field of education is reduced when leftist parties are powerful in the Laender.

Keywords

coalitionspublic expenditureconsensus democracysize of government
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 327 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alber, Jens (1986): Germany. Pp. 1–154 in Flora, Peter (Ed.), Growth to Limits. The Western European Welfare States Since World War II. Volume 2: Germany, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Alesina, Roberto and Rosenthal, Howard (1995): Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E. and Lowry, Robert C. (1994): Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States. American Political Science Review 88: 811–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Donald, Blake and Dion, Stéphane (1993): Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 37: 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles (1997): Political Parties and the Supply Side of the Economy: The Provision of Physical and Human Capital in Advanced Economies, 1960–90. American Journal of Political Science 41: 814–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräuninger, Thomas (2005): A Partisan Model of Government Expenditure. Public Choice 125: 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts and Golder, Matt (2006): Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis. Political Analysis 14: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David (1978): The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 72: 1243–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Francis G. (1989): Explaining public expenditure in OECD nations. European Journal of Political Research 17: 431–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Francis G. (1994): On religion and public policy: Does Catholicism make a difference? European Journal of Political Research 25: 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepaz, Markus M. L. (1996a): Constitutional structures and regime performance in 18 industrialized democracies: A test of Olson's hypothesis. European Journal of Political Research 29: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepaz, Markus M. L. (1996b): Consensus Versus Majoritarian Democracy. Political Institutions and their Impact on Macroeconomic Performance and Industrial Disputes. Comparative Political Studies 29: 4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepaz, Markus M. L. (2001): Veto Players, Globalization and the Redistributive Capacity of the State: A Panel Study of 15 OECD Countries. Journal of Public Policy 21: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepaz, Markus M. L. (2002): Global, Constitutional, and Partisan Determinants of Redistribution in Fifteen OECD Countries. Comparative Politics 34: 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, Thomas R. (1997): Partisan politics and public finance: Changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies, 1955–1989. Public Choice 91: 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, Thomas R. and Fuchs, Susanne (2003): Parteien, Institutionen und Staatsausgaben. Pp. 321–354 in Obinger, Herbert, Wagschal, Uwe and Kittel, Bernhard (Eds.), Politische Ökonomie. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Downs, William M. (1998): Coalition Government, Subnational Style. Multiparty Politics in Europe's Regional Parliaments. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Ministry of Finance (2007): The Federal Financial Equalisation System in Germany. URL at 09.10.2007: http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/cln_03/nn_4480/DE/Service/Downloads/Abt__V/The_20Federal_20Financial_20Equalisation_20System_20in_20Germany,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. (1996): Divided Government. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Freitag, Markus and Bühlmann, Marc (2003): Die Bildungsfinanzen der Schweizer Kantone. Swiss Political Science Review 9: 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitag, Markus and Vatter, Adrian (2008): Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer. Politische Institutionen im Vergleich. Stuttgart: UTB.Google Scholar
Galli, Emma and Rossi, Stefania P. S. (2002): Political budget cycles: The case of the Western German Laender. Public Choice 110: 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey and Mitchell, Deborah (2001): Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39: 145–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hega, Gunther M. (1999): Consensus Democracy? Swiss Education Policy Between Federalism and Subsidiarity. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hetmeier, Heinz-Werner and Weiß, Manfred (2001): Bildungsausgaben. Pp. 39–55 in Böttcher, Wolfgang, Klemm, Klaus and Rauschenbach, Thomas (Eds.), Bildung und Soziales in Zahlen. Statistisches Handbuch zu Daten und Trends im Bildungsbereich. Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. (1977): Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review 71: 1467–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. (1992): Partisan Theory after Fifteen Years. European Journal of Political Economy 8: 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander M. and Swank, Duane H. (1992): Politics, Institutions and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82. American Political Science Review 86: 658–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, James and Turrisi, Robert (2003): Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (2nd ed). Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–072. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jann, Ben (2006): Diagnostik von Regressionsschätzungen bei kleinen Stichproben, Pp. 421–452 in Diekmann, Andreas (Ed.), Methoden der Sozialforschung. Sonderheft 44 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Jochimsen, Beate and Nuscheler, Robert (2007): The Political Economy of the German Laender Deficits. Discussion Paper SP II 2007–06. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum.Google Scholar
Jun, Uwe (1994): Koalitionsbildung in den deutschen Bundesländern. Theoretische Betrachtungen, Dokumentation und Analyse der Koalitionsbildungen auf Länderebene seit 1949. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Klemm, Klaus (2003): Bildungsausgaben: Woher sie kommen, wohin sie fließen. Pp. 214–251 in Cortina, Kai S., Baumert, Jürgen, Leschinsky, Achim, Mayer, Karl Ulrich and Trommer, Luitgard (Eds.), Das Bildungswesen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Strukturen und Entwicklungen im Überblick. Ein Bericht des Max-Planck-Instituts für Bildungsforschung. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Kohler, Ulrich and Kreuter, Frauke (2001): Datenanalyse mit Stata. München: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1971): Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review 65: 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1999): Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (2008): Foreword: Consensus versus Majoritarian Democracy in the German Bundesländer. Pp. 9–10 in Freitag, Markus and Vatter, Adrian (Eds.), Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer. Politische Institutionen im Vergleich. Stuttgart: UTB.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Bumba (2003): Political Parties and the Size of Government in Multiparty Legislatures. Examining Cross-Country and Panel Data Evidence. Comparative Political Studies 36: 699–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Paul (2007): Expenditure on public order and safety. Pp. 133–158 in Castles, Francis G. (Ed.), The disappearing state? Retrenchment Realities in an Age of Globalisation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Obinger, Herbert (1998): Federalism, Direct Democracy, and Welfare State Development in Switzerland. Journal of Public Policy 18: 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1986): A theory of the incentives facing political organizations: Neo-corporatism and the hegemonic state. International Political Science Review 7: 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gerard and Tabellini, Guido (2003): How do electoral rules shape party structures, government coalitions, and economic policies? Working Paper. URL: http://rincewind.iies.su.se/∼perssont/papers/prt4_21nov03.pdf (accessed: 09.10.2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1999): The Viability of Advanced Welfare States in the International Economy: Vulnerability and Options, MPIfG Working Paper 99/9. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
Schmid, Josef and Blancke, Susanne (2006): Arbeitsmarkt- und Sozialpolitik in den Bundesländern. Pp. 295–315 in Schneider, Herbert and Wehling, Hans-Georg (Eds.), Landespolitik in Deutschland. Grundlagen – Strukturen – Arbeitsfelder. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmid, Josef and Hedrich, Horst (2008): Arbeitslosigkeit und Arbeitsmarktpolitik in den Bundesländern: Differenzierungen und Differenzen. Pp. 193–214 in Wolf, Frieder and Hildebrandt, Achim (Eds.), Politik in den Bundesländern. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. (1980): CDU und SPD an der Regierung. Ein Vergleich ihrer Politik in den Ländern. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. (1996): When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research 30: 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. (2002): Warum Mittelmaß? Deutschlands Bildungsausgaben im internationalen Vergleich. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 43 (1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. (2004): Die öffentlichen und privaten Bildungsausgaben Deutschlands im internationalen Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften 2 (1): 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. (2007): Politischer Opportunismus und Haushaltsdefizite in den westdeutschen Bundesländern. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48: 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnell, Rainer (1994): Graphisch gestützte Datenanalyse. München: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schniewind, Aline (2008): Regierungen. Pp. 111–160 in Freitag, Markus and Vatter, Adrian (Eds.), Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer. Politische Institutionen im Vergleich. Stuttgart: UTB.Google Scholar
Seitz, Helmut (2000): Fiscal policy, deficits and politics of subnational governments: The case of the German Laender. Public Choice 102: 183–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard (2001): Scaling Down: The Sub-national Comparative Method. Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Jutta (2000): Programme versus Pragmatik. Parteien und ihre Programme als Einfluss- und Gestaltungsgröße auf bildungspolitische Entscheidungsprozesse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare (1984): Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies. The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies 17: 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare (1990): Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit (2004): The size of government in majoritarian and consensus democracies. Comparative Political Studies 37: 340–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen (2004): How Institutions Evolve. The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George (2002): Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. New York: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. (1978): Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatter, Adrian and Rüefli, Christian (2003): Do Political Factors Matter for Health Care Expenditure? A Comparative Study of Swiss Cantons. Journal of Public Policy 23: 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatter, Adrian and Freitag, Markus (2007): The Contradictory Effects of Consensus Democracy on the Size of Government: Evidence from the Swiss Cantons. British Journal of Political Science 37: 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagschal, Uwe (1996): Staatsverschuldung. Ursachen im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Wagschal, Uwe (1999a): Schranken staatlicher Steuerungspolitik: Warum Steuerreformen scheitern können. Pp. 223–247 in Busch, Andreas and Plümper, Thomas (Eds.), Nationaler Staat und internationale Wirtschaft. Anmerkungen zum Thema Globalisierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Wagschal, Uwe (1999b): Statistik für Politikwissenschaftler. München: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent and Rockman, Bert A. (1993): When and How Do Institutions Matter? Pp. 445–461 in Weaver, R. Kent and Rockman, Bert A. (Eds.), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Winter de, Lieven (2005): Theoretical, Conceptual and methodological problems in applying Lijphart’s Patterns of Democracy to autonomous regions in Europe. Paper presented during the Joint Sessions of the European Consortium for Political Research, Granada, April 14–19 2005.Google Scholar
Wolf, Frieder (2005): Die Bildungsausgaben der Bundesländer im Vergleich. Gesellschaft – Wirtschaft – Politik 54: 411–423.Google Scholar
Wolf, Frieder (2006): Die Bildungsausgaben der Bundesländer im Vergleich. Welche Faktoren erklären ihre beträchtliche Variation? Münster: Lit.Google Scholar
Wolf, Frieder and Hildebrandt, Achim (2008): Politik in den Bundesländern. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut (2001): Parteien, Vetospieler und der Wettbewerb um Wählerstimmen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 42: 655–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut (2007): Öffentliche Bildungsausgaben im inter- und intranationalen Vergleich: Machen Parteien einen Unterschied? Pp. 372–388 in Schmidt, Manfred G., Ostheim, Tobias, Siegel, Nico A. and Zohlnhöfer, Reimut (Eds.), Der Wohlfahrtsstaat. Eine Einführung in den historischen und internationalen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar