Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:23:52.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Public Policy at the Crossroads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Arnold J. Heidenheimer
Arnold J. Heidenheimer
Affiliation:
Political Science, Washington University, St. Louis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article seeks to acquaint the reader with the intellectual landscape of comparative policy studies, and to raise the level of self-consciousness of scholars active in the field. To this end it discusses why comparative policy studies emerged when and where it did in the 1970s. Then it grapples with the reasons and possible effects of the fact that the very term ‘comparative policy’ is so difficult to translate into non-English languages, and links this to a discussion of problems of conceptual cohesion. The last part assesses the prospects of a field which is seeking to gain and retain intellectual coherence and respect, though not nestled comfortably within a single discipline, and is subject to contending pulls from national and international academic, political and bureaucratic forces.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1985 , pp. 441 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, Carolyn T. and Winston, Kathryn T., 1980. Mothers at Work: Public Policies in the United States, Sweden and China, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Alber, Jens, 1982. Vom Armenhaus zum Wohlfahrtstaat, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Anderson, Charles W., 1984. ‘Political Philosophy, Practical Reason and Policy Analysis,’ APSA paper.Google Scholar
Anderson, Odin W., 1972. Health Care: Can There Be Equity? The United States, Sweden and England, New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S., 1979. The Social Origins of Educational Systems, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ashford, Douglas, 1978. Comparing Public Policies: New Concepts and Methods, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ashford, Douglas, 1981. British Dogmatism and French Pragmatism: Center-Local Relations in the Welfare State, Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Ashford, Douglas, 1983. Comparing Policies Across Nation and Cultures, in Nagel, (S.S.), ed., ‘Encyclopedia of Policy Studies, New York: Dekker, pp. 171–200.Google Scholar
Ashford, Douglas E., 1984. ‘Differentiating the Welfare State.Google Scholar
Ashford, Douglas E. and Thoenig, J. Cl., 1981. ‘Les aides financiéres de l’État aux collectivites locales en France et a l’étranger,’ Paris: LITEC.Google Scholar
Baehr, Peter and Wittrock, Bjöm, ed., 1981. Policy Analysis and Policy Innovation, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Barnes, Samuel H., Kaase, Max et al. , 1979. Political Action (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
Beyme, Klaus von, 1984. ‘Do Parties Matter: The Impact of Parties on the Key Decisions in the Political System,’ Government and Opposition, 20:8 pp. 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Irirangi C., 1981. ‘Public Policy, Technology and the Environment: A Comparative Inquiry into Agricultural Policy Approaches and Environmental Outcomes in the United States and Switzerland’ Ph.D. Diss. Boston University.Google Scholar
Brickman, Ronald, Jasanoff, S. and Ilgen, T., 1985. Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian and Farlie, D. J., 1983. Voting and Party Competition, London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cameron, David R., 1982. ‘On the limits of the public economy,’ The Annals, 459, 46–62.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis B. and McKinlay, Robert D., 1979. ‘Does politics matter? An analysis of the public welfare commitment in advanced democratic states,’ European Journal of Political Research, 7, 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Frances ed., 1982. The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Diamant, Alfred, 1981. Bureaucracy and Public Policy in Neo-Corporatist Settings: Some European Lessons, Comparative Politics, 14, 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierkes, Meinolf, Weiler, Hans and Antal, Ariane, eds., (forthcoming). Comparative Policy Research: Lessons From the Past And Challenges For The Future, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Downing, Paul and Hanf, Keneth, eds., 1983. International Comparison in Implementing Pollution Laws, Boston: Kluwer-Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dror, Yehezhkel, 1985. Policy-Making Under Adversity, New Brunswick, Transaction.Google Scholar
Duclaud-Williams, Roger, 1978. The Politics of Housing in Britain and France, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Dunn, James A. Jr, 1981. Miles to Go: European And American Transportation Policies, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth and Wilks, Stephen, ed. 1983. Industrial Crisis: a Comparative Study of the State and Industry, Oxford: Robertson.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Erik and Logue, John, 1979. Welfare States in Hard Times: Denmark and Sweden in the 1970s, Kent, Ohio: Kent Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia, 1975. The Politics of Polution in a Comparative Perspective, New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Feick, Juergen, 1983. ‘Internationale Vergleichbarkeit staatlicher Interventions-Programme – Konzeptionelle und methodische Probleme’ in Mayntz, Renate, ed., Implementation Politischer Programme II, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Feldman, Elliot J., 1978. Comparative Public Policy: Field or Method? Comparative Politics, 10 (2), 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flora, Peter et al. , 1983. ‘The Growth of Mass Democracies and the Welfare States,’ in State, Economy, and Society in Western Europe 1815–1975: A Data Handbook, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, Vol. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flora, Peter and Heidenheimer, Arnold J., eds., 1981. The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary P., 1979. Immigrant Labor and Racial Conflict in Industrial Societies: The French and British Experience 1945–1975, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fried, Robert C. and Rabinowitz, Francine F., 1980. Comparative Urban Politics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goehlert, Robert U. and Martin, F. S., 1984. Policy Analysis and Management: A Bibliography, Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.Google Scholar
Grawitz, Madeleine and Leca, Jean, ed. 1985. Traitè de science politique, Vol. 4. Les politiques publiques, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Groth, Alexander J. and Wade, Larry L., eds. 1984. Comparative Resource Allocation: Politics, Performance and Policy Priorities. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Hammar, Tomas, ed. 1985. European Immigration Policy: A Comparative Study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, M. Donald, 1982. The Political Management of Economic and Social Change: Contrasting Models of Advanced Industrial Society in Sweden and West Germany, The Annals, 459, 63–76.Google Scholar
Hancock, Donald, 1983. ‘Comparative Public Policy: An Assessment,’ in Finifter, Ada, ed. Political Science: The State of the Discipline, Washington: APSA, 283–308.Google Scholar
Hartwich, Hans-Hermann, ed., 1985. Policy-Forschung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Ihr Selbstverstaendnis und ihr Verhalten zu den Grundfragen der Politikwissenschaft, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Jack, 1975. The Politics of Planning in France and Britain, Comparative Politics, 7, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headey, Bruce, 1978. Housing Policy in the Developed Economy: The U.K. Sweden and the U.S., New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh, 1978. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J., 1973. The Politics of Public Education, Health, and Welfare in the USA and Western Europe: How Growth and Reform Potentials Have Differed, British Journal of Political Science, 3:3, 315–340.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J., 1981. ‘Education and Social Security Entitlements in Europe and America,’ in The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, ed. Flora, Peter and Heidenheimer, Arnold J.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 269–304.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J., 1986. ‘Politics, Policy and Police as Concepts in English and Continental Languages,’ Review of Politics, 48:1 (01), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J. Hugh Heclo, & Adams, Carolyn Teich, 1983. Comparative Publc Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in Europe and America. New York: St. Martin's Press, (2nd ed.).Google Scholar
Heisler, M. O. and Peters, B. G., 1978. ‘Comparing Social Policy Across Levels of Government, Countries and Time: Belgium and Switzerland since 1870,’ in Ashford, , ed., 149–176.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A., 1977. Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy, American Political Science Review, 71, 1467–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogwood, Brian and Peters, B. Guy, 1983. Policy Dynamics, New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Jann, Werner, 1983. Staatliche Programme und ‘Verwaltungskultur:’ Bekaempfung des Drogenmisbrauchs und der Jugendarbeitslosigkeit in Schweden, Grossbrittanien und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Vergleich, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jann, Werner, 1983. ‘Der Policy-Ansatz: Entwicklungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und in den USA,’ Speyrer Arbeitshefte 45.Google Scholar
Kamerman, Sheila B. and Kahn, Alfred J., 1981. Chitdcare, Family Benefits and Working Parents: A Study in Comparative Policy, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, ed., 1978. Between Power and Plenty, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, 1984. Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland, and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Franz Xaver, 1985. ‘Major Problems of the Welfare State: Defining the Issues’ in Eisenstadt, Shmuel, ed. The Welfare State and its Aftermath, London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kelman, S., 1981. Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy, Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
King, Anthony, 1973. Ideas, Institutions, and the Policies of Governments: A Comparative analysis, British Journal of Political Science, 3, 291–313, 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, 1984. Politik und Energie: Energie-Technologiepolitiken in den USA, der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Frankreich und Schweden. Frankfurt, Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, Francesco, 1977. ‘Do Policies (really) determine Politics? and eventually how?’, Policy Studies Journal, 5 (special issue), 554–570.Google Scholar
Knoepfel, Peter and Weidner, Helmut, 1982. ‘Formulation and Implementation of Air Quality Control Programmes,’ Politics and Policy, 10:1, 85–109.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, 1980. ‘Social Policy Strategies and Distributional Conflict in Capitalist Democracies’ WEP, 3:3, 10, 296–316.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe (eds.), 1982. Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Leibfried, Stephan, 1978. ‘Public Assistance in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany: Does Social Democracy Make a Difference?,’ Comparative Politics, 11 (11), pp. 59–76, (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leichter, Howard M., 1979. A Comparative Approach to Policy Analysis: Health Care Policy in Four Nations, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Robert A., and Solomon, M. A., Wellstern, G. and Wollmann, H., eds., 1981. Evaluation Research and Practice: Comparative and International Perspectives, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Leon N. and Maier, Charles S., eds. 1985. The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation, Washington: Brookings.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore, 1972. ‘Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice,’ Public Administration Review, XXXII (4), 07/08, 298 ff.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore, 1978. ‘Public Policy and Bureaucracy in the United States and France,’ in Ashford, D. E. ed, Comparing Public Policies, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Lundqvist, Lennart, 1980. The Hare and the Tortoise: Clean Air Policies in the United States and Sweden, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Maurice, M., Sellier, F. and Silvestre, J.J., 1982. Politique d'education et organisation industrielle en France et en Allemagne, Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Mayntz, Renate, 1983. ‘The Conditions of Effective Public Policy: A New Challenge for Policy Analysis,’ Policy and Politics, 11:2123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Richard and Anna, , eds., 1985. Innovation in the public Sector, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Michaud, C. and Thoenig, J. Cl., 1981. La regulation du transport aerien en Europe, Fountainebleu: INSEAD.Google Scholar
Murswieck, Axel, 1983. Die staatliche Kontrolle der Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Bundesrepublik und den USA, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy and Pollak, Michael, 1977. ‘The Politics of Participation and the Nuclear Debate in Sweden, the Netherlands and Austria,’ Public Policy 25 (3), (Summer) 333–357.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy, Doughtie, John C. and McCulloch, M. Kathleen, 1977. ‘Type of Democratic Systems and Type of Public Policy,’ Comparative Politics, 06, 9 (3), 327–355.Google Scholar
Premfors, Rune, 1980. The Politics of Higher Education in a Comparative Perspective: France, Sweden, United Kingdom: Stockholm: Stockholm University, Political Science Dept.Google Scholar
Rainwater, Lee, Rein, Martin and Schwartz, Joseph, 1985. Family Weil-Being in the Welfare State.Google Scholar
Richardson, Jeremy, 1982. ed Policy Styles in Western Europe, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Rohe, Karl, 1978. Politik: Begriffe und Wirklichkeiten, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, 1973. ‘Comparing Public Policy: An Overview.’ EJPR, 1(1):67–93.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, 1984. Understanding Big Government: The Programme Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, 1985. ‘Comparative Policy Analysis: The Programme Approach’ in Deutsch, Karl W. and Dogan, Mattei, ed, Similarities and Contrasts Among Nations.Google Scholar
Rosenberry, Sara A., 1982. ‘Social Insurance, Distributive, Criteria and the Welfare Backlash: A Comparative Analysis, BJPS, October, 12:4, 421–447.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni, 1970 ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics,’ APSR, 64:4 (12) 1033–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbragia, Alberta, 1979. The Politics of Local Borrowing: A Comparative Analysis. Glasgow: Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy 27.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W., 1977. ‘Public Organization and the Waning of the Welfare State: A Research Perspective,’ EJPR, 5, 329–346.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W., 1978 ‘Comparative Policy Studies: Cases in Search of Systematic Theory,’ EJPR, 6 (1). 117–25.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W., 1981. The Political Economy of Inflation and Unemployment in Western Europe, Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W., 1985. ‘The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German and European Integration,’ Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G., 1980. CDU und SPD an der Regierung: Ein Vergteich Ihrer Politik in den Laendern, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G., 1982. Wohlfahrtstaatliche Politik unter buergerlichen und sozialdemokratischen Regierungen, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C, 1981. ‘Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability in Contemporary Western Europe and North America,’ in Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism and the Transformation of Politics, ed. Berger, Suzanne, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwerin, Don S., 1980. ‘Norwegian and Danish Incomes Policies and European Monetary Integration,’ West European Politics, 3:3, 338–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalev, Michael, 1983. ‘Class Politics and the Western Welfare State,’ eds. Spiro, Shiman and Yuchtman-Yaar, EphraimEvaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, Ira, 1979. Wither the State: Politics and Public Enterprise in Three Countries. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L. J. ed., 1981. The Local Fiscal Crisis in Western Europe: Myths and Realities, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Shonfield, Andrew W., 1983. Modern Capitalism, 2nd Ed., New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Ikenberry, John, 1983. ‘The Political Formation of the American Welfare State in Historical and Comparative Perspective,’ Comparative Social Research, 6, 87–148.Google Scholar
Smith, T. Alexander, 1975. The Comparative Policy Process. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio Press.Google Scholar
Sommer, Louise, 1930. ‘Cameralism,’ Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 158–60.Google Scholar
‘The Place of Policy Analysis in Political Science: Five Perspectives,’ 1977. American Journal of Political Science, 21:2, 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therborn, Göran, 1985. ‘Classes and States: Welfare State Developments 1881–1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoenig, J. C, 1985. ‘L'Analyse des politiques publiques,’ in Grawitz and Leca, ed. Les politiques publiques, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
Thurn, Georg, Wagner, Peter, Wittrock, Björn and Wollmann, Hellmut, forthcoming. ‘Development and Present State of Public Policy Research: Country Studies in Comparative Perspective.’ Berlin.Google Scholar
Uusitalo, Hannu, 1984. ‘Comparative Research on the Determinants of the Welfare State; the State of the Art,’ EJPR, 12:4, 403–415.Google Scholar
Vogel, David, 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policies in Great Britain and the United States, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wiajr, Jerzy and Rose, Richard, eds., 1977. Comparing Public Policies. Warsaw: Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron forthcoming. ‘Doing More and Using Less: Utilization of Research as a Result of Regime,’ in Dierkes and Weiler, op. cit.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L., 1975 The Welfare State and Equality, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L., 1981. ‘Leftism, Catholicism, and Democratic Corporatism: The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development,’ Peter Flora and Arnold J. Heidenheimer, eds., The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, pp. 345–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittrock, Björn, 1980. ‘Science Policy and the Challenge to the Welfare State, WEP, 3:3, 358–372.Google Scholar
Zysman, John, 1983. Governments, Markets and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar