Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:52:07.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Alternative Education Programs in Meeting the Needs of Adolescent Students With Challenging Behaviour: Characteristics of Best Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Terry de Jong  and
Coosje Griffiths
Terry de Jong*
Affiliation:
Edith Cowan University, Western Australia. [email protected]
Coosje Griffiths
Affiliation:
Department of Education and Training, Western Australia.
*
*Address for Correspondence: Dr Terry de Jong, School of Education, Edith Cowan University, 100 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

Recently the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) conducted a nationwide survey on programs that exhibit best practice in addressing student behaviour issues (de Jong, 2004). Seven themes related to the characteristics of best practice were identified in this survey. Alternative education programs (AEPs) was one of them. Although contentious in the context of inclusive education, this survey indicated that, provided they are embedded in best practice, AEPs are still considered to be a creditable means of meeting the needs of adolescent students with challenging behaviour in most Australian education jurisdictions. This being so, what constitutes best practice in the construction and delivery of an AEP? This is the main focus of our article. We briefly define AEPs, submit a continuum of types of AEPs, consider the cases against and in favour of AEPs, and conclude by presenting the characteristics of quality AEPs according to three categories, namely: (1) organisation and partnerships, (2) pastoral care and ethos, and (3) curriculum and pedagogy.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 16 , Issue 1: Special Issue: MindMatters Plus: A national mental health initiative in secondary schools , December 2005 , pp. 29 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)