Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T00:59:10.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptions of psychological recommendation strategies: A review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Jennifer Farrell  and
Esther Care
Jennifer Farrell
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Esther Care*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
*
Educational Psychology Unit, Faculty of Education, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. Email:, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

School psychology reports typically include program recommendations for teachers to implement with their students. These recommendations, however, are not always followed up. This brief review identifies and discusses some of the factors which may account for this phenomenon. Lack of research in the field is evident, particularly in the Australian context. Issues of role identification of psychologists in the school system, and the expectations of them held by teaching staff are discussed.

Type
Research papers
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , November 2000 , pp. 19 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

D'Amato, R.C., & Dean, R.S. (1987). Psychology reports, individual education programs, and daily lesson plans: Are they related? Professional School Psychology, 2(2), 93–101.Google Scholar
Davidson, I., & Simmons, J. N. (1991). Assessment reports: A preliminary study of teachers' perceptions. Journal of Special Education, 15, 247–253.Google Scholar
Eberst, N.D., & Genshaft, J. (1984). Differences in school psychology report writing. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 78–82.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, G.E., & Chandy, J. (1973). Teachers' perceptions of school psychology services. Journal of School Psychology, 11(2), 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutkin, T.B. (1980). Teacher perceptions of consultation services provided by school psychologists. Professional Psychology, 11(4), 637–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagborg, W. J., & Aiello-Coultier, M. (1994). Teachers' perceptions of psychologists' reports of assessment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(1), 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, K. W., Fredrick, L. D., Best, S., Dykes, M. K., & Cohen, E. T. (2000). Specialized health care procedures in the schools: Training and service delivery. Exceptional Children, 66(2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, M.P., & Retish, P.M. (1984). A comparison of two types of assessment reports. Exceptional Children, 51(3), 225–229.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, S. (1984). What do they expect? Head-teacher, teacher, and social worker expectations of EP's. Educational Psychology in Practice, 1(3), 108–111.Google Scholar
Mamlin, N., & Harris, K.R. (1998). Elementary teachers' referral to special education in light of inclusion and pre-referral: every child is here to learn…but some of these children are real trouble. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 385–396.Google Scholar
Mertens, D.M. (1976). Expectations of teachers in training: the influence of a student's sex and a behavioural vs. descriptive approach in a biased psychological report. Journal of School Psychology, 14(3), 222–229.Google Scholar
Noell, G. H., & Witt, J. C. (1999). When does consultation lead to intervention implementation? Journal of Special Education, 33, 1–9.Google Scholar
Ownby, R.L. (1990). A study of the expository process model in school psychology reports. Psychology in the Schools, 27, 353–358.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ownby, R.L., & Wallbrown, F.H., & Brown, D.Y. (1982). Special education teachers' perceptions of reports written by school psychologists'. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 955–961.Google Scholar
Ownby, R.L., & Wallbrown, F.H. (1983). Evaluating school psychology reports part 1: a procedure for systematic feed-back. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 41–45.Google Scholar
Pryzwansky, W.B., & Hanania, J.S. (1986). Applying problem solving approaches to school psychology reports. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 133–141.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.D. (1970). Perceptions of actual and desired role functions of school psychologists by psychologists and teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 175–178.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A.H., & Rust, J.O. (1994). Role and function of school psychologists, 1992-93: a comparative study. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 113–119.Google Scholar
Rafoth, M.A., & Richmond, B.O. (1983). Useful terms in psychology reports: a survey of students, teachers and psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 346–350.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, M.M., & Kratochwill, T.R. (1992). Teacher reactions to behavioural consultation: an analysis of language and involvement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7(1). 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rucker, C.N. (1967). Technical language in the school psychologist's report. Psychology in the Schools, 4, 146–150.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvagno, M., & Teglasi, H. (1987). Teacher perceptions of different types of information in psychology reports. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 415–424.Google Scholar
Sheridan, S., Welch, M., & Orme, S. (1996). Is consultation effective? A review of outcome research. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 341–354.Google Scholar
Shively, J.J., & Smith, A.E. (1969). Understanding the psychology report. Psychology in the Schools, 6, 272–273.Google Scholar
Smith, D.K. (1984). Practicing school psychologists: their characteristics, activities, and populations served. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 15(6), 798–810.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. (1985). Teacher's comprehension of psychology reports. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 60–64.Google Scholar
White, G.W., Nielsen, L., & Prus, J.S. (1984). Head start teacher and aide preferences for degree of specificity in written psychological recommendations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15(6), 785–790.Google Scholar
Witt, J.C. (1986). Teachers resistance to the use of school-based interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 37–44.Google Scholar
Zins, J.E., & Barnett, D.W. (1983). Report writing: legislative, ethical, and professional challenges. Journal of School Psychology, 21, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar