Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:42:55.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nature of Feared Outcome Representations in Anxious and Non-anxious Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Marilyn A Campbell ,
Ronald M Rapee  and
Susan H Spence
Marilyn A Campbell*
Affiliation:
Education Queensland
Ronald M Rapee
Affiliation:
School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University
Susan H Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Queensland
*
3 Hoopla Hannah Ct, Yatala 4207, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The present study examined whether wording changes in a self-report anxiety scale for children were better able to distinguish anxious from non-anxious children than traditional wording. Furthermore, the study explored whether phrasing the items as either stimulus or consequences (outcomes) of events, would give a better assessment of fear and anxiety in children and adolescents. The four questionnaires were administered to an anxiety-disordered group and a non-anxious group of children aged from 6 to 15 years. Anxious children reported that they thought more about negative outcomes than non-anxious children. However, there were no differences in scores between the two groups using stimulus items. All children regarded negative physical consequences as aversive. However, anxious children reported thinking more frequently about negative physical outcomes than did non-anxious children. All children also thought about negative social outcomes. However, anxiety-disordered children rated negative social outcomes as more aversive than did non-anxious children. None of the four measures discriminated between the different anxiety disorders. Implications for children's self-report data on anxiety are discussed.

Type
Research papers
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 11 , November 2001 , pp. 85 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, P.M., Rapee, R.M., Dadds, M.M., & Ryan, S.M. (1996). Family enhancement of cognitive style in anxious and aggressive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell-Dolan, D., Last, C.G., & Strauss, C.C. (1990). Symptoms of anxiety disorders in normal children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 759–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, M., & Rapee, R. (1994). The nature of feared outcome representations in children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, M., Rapee, R., & Spence, S. (2001). Developmental changes in the interpretation of rating format of a questionnaire measure of worry. Clinical Psychologist, 5, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, K. (1990). Depression and anxiety in children: A comparison of self-report questionnaires to clinical interview. Psychological Assessment, 2, 376–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoehn-Saric, E., Maisami, M., & Wiegand, D. (1987). Measurement of anxiety in children and adolescents using semistructured interviews. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 541–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Last, C.G. (1991). Somatic complaints in anxiety disordered children. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 5, 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNally, R.J., & Foa, E.B. (1987). Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threat. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattison, R.E., & Bagnato, S.J., (1987). Empirical measurement of overanxious disorder in boys 8 to 12 years old. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 536–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattison, R.E., Bagnato, S.J., & Brubaker, B.H. (1988). Diagnostic utility of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale in children with DSM-III anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollendick, T.H. (1983). Reliability and validity of the revised fear survey schedule for children (FSSC-R). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 685–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollendick, T.H. (1987). The Fear Survey Schedule for Children -Revised. In Hersen, M., & Bellack, A.S. (Eds.), Dictionary of Behavioral Assessment Techniques. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Perrin, S., & Last, C.G. (1992). Do childhood anxiety measures measure anxiety? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 567–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, C.R., & Richmond, B.O. (1978). What I think and feel: A revised measure of children's manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, C.R., & Richmond, B.O. (1985). Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale: Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Silverman, W.K., & Nelles, W.B. (1988). The anxiety disorder interview schedule for children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 772–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slee, P.T., & Cross, D.G. (1989). Living in the nuclear age: An Australian study of children's and adolescent's fears. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 19, 270–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stattin, H. (1984). Developmental trends in the appraisal of anxiety-provoking situations. Journal of Personality, 52, 46–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, C.C., Last, C.G., Hersen, M., & Kazdin, A.E. (1988). Association between anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, J.C., Heffer, R.W., & Pfeiffer, J. (1990). Structured rating scales: A review of self-report and informant rating procedures and issues. In Reynolds, C.R. & Kamphaus, R.W. (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children (pp.364–394). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar