Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:10:18.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interventions for Adolescents: Two Programs Based on a Multisystemic Problem-Solving Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Stephen A. Rollin  and
Frances F. Prevatt
Stephen A. Rollin*
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Frances F. Prevatt
Affiliation:
Florida State University
*
College of Education, Dept of Human Service and studies, Florida State University, 215 Stone Building, B-194 Tallahassee Florida 32306 - 3001, USA
Get access

Abstract

This article describes two interventions for adolescents based on a multisystemic problem-solving approach. One intervention is a school reentry program for chronically ill adolescents, while the other is a violence prevention program for at-risk youth. Commonalties across the two programs include individualized interventions; an educationally oriented, skills based approach; systems consultation; peers as important change agents; and inclusion of parents, teachers, and community agents. The article discusses the importance of a multisystemic, problem solving approach to interventions. Next, the two individual prevention programs are described. Finally, implications for practice are reviewed for each of the programs.

Type
Interventions
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 9 , Issue S1: Health, Well-being and Coping in Young People , August 1999 , pp. 123 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, N. (1958). The psychodynamics of family life∸ New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In Guerin, P.J. (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice. New York: Gardner.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development∸ Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chekryn, J., Deegan, M., & Reid, J. (1987). Impact on teachers when a child with cancer returns to school. Children's Health Care, 15,161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. (1989). Educational needs of the terminally ill student. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 12,235–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Education (1998). Early warning timely response: A guide to safe schools.Google Scholar
Henggler, S.W. & Borduin, C.M. (1990). Family therapy and beyond: A multisystemic approach to treating the behavior problems of children and adolescents. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Henning, J., & Fritz, G.K. (1983). School reentry in childhood cancer. Psychosomatics, 24, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (1989). Research on children and adolescents with mental, behavioural, and developmental disorders. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.H., Rasbury, W.C., & Siegel, L.J. (1997). Approaches to child treatment: Introduction to theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A.E. (1977). A model for developing effective treatments: Progression and interplay of theory, research, and practice. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26,144–129.Google Scholar
Kries, P. (1996). The Adams Middle School Program∸ Tallahassee, FL., Florida Department of Education.Google Scholar
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy∸ Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, D., Weller, S., Satterwhite, B., & Pless, I. B. (1984). Psychological implications of chronic illness in adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 7, 75–85.Google Scholar
Panella, D.H., Cooper, P.R, & Henggeler, S.W. (1982). Peer relations in adolescence. In Hennggeler, S.W. (Ed), Delinquency and adolescent psycho-pathology: A family-ecological systems approach. Littleton, MA: Wright-PSG.Google Scholar
Pate, T., Rollin, S.A., Kreis, P. (1997). The Florida School Violence Prevention Project. Washington, D.C.: Mamilton Fish Institute.Google Scholar
Prevatt, F.F., Heffer, R., & Lowe, P. (1998). A review of school reintegration programs for children with cancer∸ Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (1992). Behavior Assessment System for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Schwartz, W. (1997). An overview of strategies to reduce school violence. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education.Google Scholar
Sexson, S. B., & Madan-Swain, A. (1993). School reentry for the child with chronic illness. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilly, W.D., & Flugum, K.R., (1995). Best practices in ensuring quality interventions. In Thomas, A. & Grimes, J. (Eds.), Best Practices in school psychology, III, (485-500). Washington D.C.: The National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
Varni, J.W., Katz, E.R., Colegrove, R., & Dolgin, M. (1994). Perceived social support and adjustment of children newly diagnosed with cancer. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 15,20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J.H., & Jackson, D.D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interaction patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Worchel-Prevatt, F., Heffer, R.W., Prevatt, B.C., Miner, J., Young-Saleme, T., Horgan, D., Lopez, M.A., Rae, W.A., & Frankel, L. (1998). A school reentry program for chronically ill children. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar