Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:43:22.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Lethal Cocktail: Low Self-belief, Low Control, and High Fear of Failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2015

Andrew J. Martin*
Affiliation:
University of Western Sydney, Australia
*
Dr Andrew Martin, SELF Research Centre, Bankstown Campus, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 1797, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Cluster analysis of school students' responses to the Student Motivation Scale (Martin, 2001, in press) identified two groups of students separated on the basis of their self-belief, sense of control, and fear of failure. The first group reflects failure avoidance and is represented by a lethal cocktail of low self-belief, low control, and high fear of failure. The second group reflects success orientation and is represented by high self-belief, high control, and low fear of failure. Follow-up analyses to validate these two clusters showed that the failure avoidant students were significantly higher in anxiety and pessimism and significantly lower in achievement. Implications are discussed for intervention and prevention aimed at enhancing students' self-belief and control and reducing students' fear of failure. Also discussed is the need to develop goals, incentives, and climates for students that draw them to attain success rather than drive them to avoid failure.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, L.Y., Seligman, M.E.P., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 4974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alpert, R., & Haber, R.N. (1960). Anxiety in academic achievement situations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 207215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atkinson, J.W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking. Psychological Review, 64, 359372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Connell, J.P. (1985). A new multidimensional measure of children's perceptions of control. Child Development, 56, 10181041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Covington, M.V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covington, M.V., & Beery, R.G. (1976). Self-worth and school learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Covington, M.V., & Omelich, C.L. (1991). Need achievement revisited: Verification of Atkinson's original 2 × 2 model. In Spielberger, C.D.., Sarason, I.G.., Kulcsar, Z.., & Van Heck, G.L., (Eds.), Stress and emotion Vol 14. New York, NY: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Covington, M.V., & Roberts, B.W. (1994). Self-worth and college achievement: Motivational and personality correlates. In Pintrich, P.R.., Brown, D.R.., & Weinstein, C.E. (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Craven, R.G., Marsh, H.W., & Debus, R.L. (1991). Effects of internally focused feedback and attributional feedback on the enhancement of academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, A.J., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (1994). Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A motivational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 968980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, J.A., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (1992). Winning is not enough: The effects of competition and achievement orientation on intrinsic interest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 128138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J.M., & Elliot, A.J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 904915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harackiewicz, J.M., & Manderlink, G. (1984). A process analysis of the effects of performance-contingent rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 531551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harter, S., & Connell, J.P. (1984). A model of children's achievement and related self-perceptions of competence, control, and motivation orientation. In Nicholls, J. (Ed.). The development of achievement motivation. London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, H.W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A.J. (1998). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Predictors and consequences from a self-worth motivation perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.Google Scholar
Martin, A.J. (2001). The Student Motivation Scale: A tool for measuring and enhancing students' motivation. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 11, 120.Google Scholar
Martin, A.J. (in press). The Student Motivation Scale: Further testing of an instrument that measures school students' motivation. Australian Journal of Education.Google Scholar
Martin, A.J., & Debus, R.L. (1998). Self-reports of mathematics self-concept and educational outcomes: The roles of ego-dimensions and self-consciousness. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 517535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, A.J.Marsh, H.W., & Debus, R.L. (2001a). A quadripolar need achievement representation of self-handicapping and defensive pessimism. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 583610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A.J., Marsh, H.W., & Debus, R.L. (2001b). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 87102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A.J.Marsh, H.W., & Debus, R.L. (in press). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: A model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
McClelland, D.C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20, 321333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerney, D. (2000). Helping kids achieve their best. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Meece, J.L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (1990). Predictors of mathematics anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrolment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 6070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, B.C., Skinner, E.A., & Connell, J.P. (1993). What motivates children's behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 781791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pintrich, P.R., & Blumenfeld, P.C. (1985). Classroom experience and children's self-perceptions of ability, effort, and conduct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 646657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schunk, D.H. (1990). Introduction to the special section on motivation and efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, E.A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J.G., & Connell, J.P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 2232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, T. (1994). Self-worth protection: Review and implications for the classroom. Educational Review, 46, 259274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar