Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:57:28.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can Implementation of a Resilience Program for Primary School Children Enhance the Mental Health of Teachers?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Orla Tyson
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Australia.
Clare M. Roberts*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Australia. [email protected]
Robert Kane
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Australia.
*
*Address for Correspondence: Clare M. Roberts, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University of Technology, Kent Street, Bentley WA 6102, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

This study investigated whether a mental health promotion program delivered by primary school teachers to prevent internalising problems in children had any impact on the teachers' job-related affective wellbeing. Teacher job-related anxiety and job-related depression were measured before teaching the Aussie Optimism program, and after implementation at 12 and 24 months. Schools and teachers were randomised to one of three groups: Aussie Optimism with Teacher Training; Aussie Optimism with Teacher Training and Coaching; or the Usual Care control group, which implemented the regular Western Australian Health Education Curriculum. In all three groups, teachers taught lessons to promote student self-management and interpersonal skills during the last two years of primary school. Teachers in schools in the control group received training in Aussie Optimism after the first year of intervention. Data was collected from 405 primary school teachers in 63 government primary schools. Multiple hierarchical regression analyses showed partial support for the hypotheses, with teachers in the Training and Coaching intervention group reporting significantly lower levels of job-related anxiety at the 12-month assessment and depression at both the 12- and 24-month assessments when compared to teachers in the Usual Care control group. There were no significant differences between teachers in the Training only group and the control group after intervention.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)