Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7pht Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:58:24.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomy and biostratigraphy of Coniacian through Maastrichtian Anchura (Gastropoda: Aporrhaiidae) of the North American Pacific Slope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

William P. Elder  and
L. R. Saul
William P. Elder
Affiliation:
U. S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025
L. R. Saul
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

North American Pacific Slope deposits of Coniacian to Maastrichtian age have yielded eight biostratigraphically useful species of Anchura: A. (Helicaulax?) popenoei new species, Coniacian; A. halberdopsis new species, early Campanian; A. callosa Whiteaves, 1903, early Campanian; A. falciformis (Gabb, 1864), late early to middle Campanian; A. phaba new species, middle to late Campanian; A. ainikta new species, middle to late Campanian; A. gibbera Webster, 1983, late Campanian to early Maastrichtian; A. baptos new species, late Maastrichtian to early Danian. In addition, two other possible species are A. nanaimoensis (Whiteaves, 1879), middle to late Campanian, and Anchura? new species, late Maastrichtian. These species together with two additional Turonian species, A. (Helicaulax) tricosa Saul and Popenoe, 1993, and A. (H.) condoniana Anderson, 1902, allow the definition at least eight Late Cretaceous Anchura zones for the Pacific Slope. These zones have durations of 1.5 m.y. to 4 m.y.

Anchura (H.?) popenoei from northern California appears most closely related to A. (Helicaulax) tricosa Saul and Popenoe, 1993, of Turonian age from southern California. Anchura callosa, A. falciformis, A. nanaimoensis, and A. phaba appear to be closely related based on sculptural elements, as does A. gibbera despite having an anterior spur on the wing. However, these species appear to belong to two latitudinally differentiated faunal provinces. Species having a northern range include A. callosa, A. falciformis, and A. nanaimoensis, whereas A. phaba and A. gibbera are from more southern deposits, as are also A. halberdopsis, A. ainikta, and A. baptos.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , May 1996 , pp. 381 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, R. T. 1960. The genus Strombus in the Indo-Pacific. Indo-Pacific Mollusca 1:33–62.Google Scholar
Anderson, F. M. 1902. Cretaceous deposits of the Pacific Coast. California Academy of Sciences Proceedings, Series 3, 2, 143 p.Google Scholar
Anderson, F. M. 1938. Lower Cretaceous deposits in California and Oregon. Geological Society of America Special Paper 16, 339 p.Google Scholar
Anderson, F. M. 1958. Upper Cretaceous of the Pacific Coast. Geological Society of America Memoir 71, 378 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannon, J. L., Bottjer, D. J., Lund, S. P., and Saul, L. R. 1989. Campanian/Maastrichtian stage boundary in southern California: Resolution and implications for large-scale depositional patterns. Geology, 17:80–83.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1965. Catalogue of type invertebrate fossils of the Geological Survey of Canada. Volume II. Geological Survey of Canada, 344 p.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1968. Catalogue of type invertebrate fossils of the Geological Survey of Canada. Volume IV. Geological Survey of Canada, 221 p.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1860. Descriptions of new species of Cretaceous and Eocene fossils of Mississippi and Alabama. Journal of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, Series 2, 4:275–298.Google Scholar
Colburn, I. P., Saul, L. R., and Almgren, A. A. 1981. Chatsworth Formation: a new formation name for the Upper Cretaceous strata of the Simi Hills, California, p. 9–16. In Link, M. H., Squires, R. L., and Colburn, I. P. (eds.), Simi Hills Cretaceous Turbidites, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Volume and Guidebook.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1904. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée. Paris, Volume 6, 151 p.Google Scholar
Davies, A.M. [revised by Eames, F.E.] 1971. Tertiary Faunas. Volume 1. The composition of the faunas. George Allen and Unwin Limited, London, 57 p.Google Scholar
Davis, C. H. 1913. New species from the Santa Lucia Mountains, California, with a discussion of the Jurassic age of the slates at Slate's Springs. Journal of Geology, 21:435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dockery, D. T. III. 1993. The Streptoneuran gastropods, exclusive of the Stenoglossa, of the Coffee Sand (Campanian) of northeastern Mississippi. Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Geology, Bulletin 129, 191 p.Google Scholar
Elder, W. P., and Saul, L. R. 1993. Paleogeographic implications of molluscan assemblages in the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) Pigeon Point Formation, California, p. 171–185. In Dunne, G., and McDougall, K. (eds.), Mesozoic Paleogeography of the Western United States—II. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Book 71.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous fossils. California Geological Survey, Palaeontology, 1:57–243, plates 9-32, 1865.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1868. An attempt at a revision of the two families, Strombidae and Aporrhaidae. American Journal of Conchology 4:137–149.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. California Geological Survey, Palaeontology vol. 2, 299 p.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, G. A. 1826-1844. Petrefacta Germaniae, &c. Petrefacta Musei Universitatis. Aggildungen und Beschreibungen der Petrefacten Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Länder .… herausgegeben von A. Goldfuss. Düsseldorf. Volume 1, 1826-1833, 252 p.; Volume 2, 1833-1840, 165 p.; Volume 3, 1844, 128 p.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W., and Shimer, H. W. 1909. North American index fossils. A. G. Seiler and Company, New York, Volume 1, 853 p.Google Scholar
Gradstein, F. M., Agterberg, F. P., Ogg, J. G., Hardenbol, J., van Veen, P., Thierry, J., and Huang, Z. 1994. A Mesozoic time scale. Journal of Geophysical Research, series B, 99:24,051–24,074.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1850. Systematic arrangement of the figures, p. 63–124. In Gray, M. E., Figures of molluscous animals selected from various authors; etched for the use of students. Long, Brown, etc., London, Volume 4, 219 p.Google Scholar
Haggart, J. W. 1986. Stratigraphy of the Redding Formation of north-central California and its bearing on Late Cretaceous paleogeography, p. 161–178. In Abbott, P. L. (ed.), Cretaceous stratigraphy western North America. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Book 46.Google Scholar
Haggart, J. W. and Ward, P. D. 1984. Late Cretaceous (Santonian-Campanian) stratigraphy of the northern Sacramento Valley, California. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 95:618–627.Google Scholar
Haggart, J. W. and Ward, P. D. 1989. New Nanaimo Group ammonites (Cretaceous, Santonian-Campanian) from British Columbia and Washington State. Journal of Paleontology, 63:218–227.Google Scholar
Kirby, M. X. 1991. Macropaleontology and biostratigraphy across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary, San Francisquito Formation, Warm Springs Mountain, Los Angeles County, southern California. Unpublished , , 134 p.Google Scholar
Kirby, M. X. and Saul, L. R. 1995. The Tethyan bivalve Roudairia from the Upper Cretaceous of California. Palaeontology, 38:23–38.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, Carl. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Editio decima, reformata. Stockholm, Volume 1, Regnum animale, 824 p.Google Scholar
Loch, J. D. 1989. A new genus of aporrhaid gastropod from southern California. Journal of Paleontology, 63:574–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1960. Upper Cretaceous ammonites of California, Part III. Kyushu University, Faculty of Science Memoirs, Series D, Geology, Special Volume 2, 204 p.Google Scholar
Muller, J. E., and Jeletzky, J. A. 1970. Geology of the Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group, Vancouver Island and Gulf Islands, British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 69-25, 77 p.Google Scholar
Obradovich, J. D. 1993. A Cretaceous time scale, p. 379–396. In Caldwell, W. G. E., and Kauffman, E. G. (eds.), Evolution of the Western Interior Basin. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 39.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1944. Contributions to the paleontology of northern Peru: Part VII. The Cretaceous of the Paita region. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 111, 114 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1842-1847. Description des animaux invertébrés; 2 Gastéropodes. Paléontologie française, terrain Crétacé, Series 1, 2. 456 p.Google Scholar
Popenoe, W. P., and Saul, L. R. 1987. Evolution and classification of the Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary gastropod Perissitys. Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Contributions in Science 380, 37 p.Google Scholar
Popenoe, W. P., and Susuki, T. 1987. Gyrodiform gastropods from the Pacific Coast Cretaceous and Paleocene. Journal of Paleontology 61:70–100.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyses de la nature ou tableau de l'universe et des corps organisées. Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Roy, K. 1994. Effects of the Mesozoic marine revolution on the taxonomic, morphologic, and biogeographic evolution of a group: aporrhaid gastropods during the Mesozoic. Paleobiology, 20:274–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, L. R. 1983. Turritella zonation across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, California. University of California Publications, Geological Sciences 125, 164 p.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. 1988. New Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary Perissityidae (Gastropoda) from the Pacific Slope of North America. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, Contributions in Science 400, 25 p.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. and Popenoe, W. P. 1992. Pacific Slope Cretaceous bivalves of the genus Calva. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, Contributions in Science 433, 68 p.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. and Popenoe, W. P. 1993. Additions to Pacific Slope Turonian Gastropoda. The Veliger 36:351–388.Google Scholar
Shimer, H. W., and Shrock, R. R. 1944. Index fossils of North America. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 837 p.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1859. Descriptions of new fossils from the Tertiary formations of Oregon and Washington Territories and the Cretaceous of Vancouver's Island, collected by Dr. Jno. Ivans, U. S. geologist, under instructions from the Department of the Interior. Transactions of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Saint Louis, 1:120–125.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1960. Archaeogastropoda, Mesogastropoda, and stratigraphy of the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff Formations. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 331-A, 152 p.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1977. Utility of gastropods in biostratigraphy, p. 519–539. In Kauffman, E. G., and Hazel, J. E. (eds.), Concepts and methods of biostratigraphy. Dowden Hutchinson, and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1927. Gabb's California fossil type gastropods. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 78 [1926]:287–447.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A., and Riney, B. 1984. Preliminary report on the Upper Cretaceous macro-invertebrate faunas near Carlsbad, California, p. 103–107. In Abbott, P. L. (ed.), Upper Cretaceous depositional systems, southern California-northern Baja California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Guidebook.Google Scholar
Taff, H. A., Hanna, G. D., and Cross, C. M. 1940. Type locality of the Cretaceous Chico Formation. Geological Society of America Bulletin 51:1311–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taliaferro, N. L. 1944. Cretaceous and Paleocene of Santa Lucia Range, California. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 28:449–521.Google Scholar
Verosub, K. L., Haggart, J. W., and Ward, P. D. 1989. Magneto-stratigraphy of Upper Cretaceous strata of the Sacramento Valley, California. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 101:521–533.Google Scholar
Wade, B. 1926. The fauna of the Ripley Formation on Coon Creek, Tennessee. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 137, 272 p.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D. 1978. Revisions to the stratigraphy and biochronology of the Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group, British Columbia and Washington State. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 15:405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, M. L. 1983. New species of Xenophora and Anchura (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from the Cretaceous of Baja California Norte, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 57:1050–1097.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1879. Contributions to invertebrate paleontology, no. 1: Cretaceous fossils of the western states and territories. U. S. Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories (Hayden Survey), Annual Report 11:273–320.Google Scholar
Whiteaves, J. F. 1879. On the fossils of the Cretaceous rocks of Vancouver and adjacent Islands in the Strait of Georgia. Canada Geological Survey, Mesozoic Fossils, 1(2):93–190.Google Scholar
Whiteaves, J. F. 1903. On some additional fossils from the Vancouver Cretaceous, with a revised list of species therefrom. Canada Geological Survey, Mesozoic Fossils, 1(5):309–415.Google Scholar