Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:00:17.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ontogenies of trilobites from the lower Ordovician Garden City Formation of Idaho and their implications for the phylogeny of the Cheirurina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Dong-Chan Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada
Brian D. E. Chatterton
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada

Abstract

Ontogenies of three trilobites from the Garden City Formation (Tremadocian to early Arenigian; equivalent to Ibexian) are described: Tesselacauda depressa (Pilekiidae), Rossaspis pliomeris (Protopliomeropsinae), and Protopliomerella contracta (Cybelopsinae).

Comparison of both larval and adult features of the described trilobites with those of cheirurids and encrinurids suggests that three lineages of the Cheirurina existed during the Early and Middle Ordovician. Members of the first lineage show the following hierarchical relationships; (Tesselacauda depressa (Cheirurinae (Acanthoparyphinae (two separate Sphaerexochinae groups)))). Within the second lineage, the following internested relationships of its members are recognized; (Protopliomeropsinae (“early” cybelines (“advanced” cybelines and Encrinurinae))). The Cybelopsinae constitute the third lineage that is considered as an immediate outgroup to the above two lineages. Pattern of nested distribution of synapomorphies within all these lineages reveals that the two pliomerid subfamilies (Protopliomeropsinae and Cybelopsinae) do not share a recent common ancestor, suggesting that the Pliomeridae is a paraphyletic group.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, D. C. 1916. A revision of the Cheirurinae, with notes on their evolution. Washington University Studies, 3:101152.Google Scholar
Bergström, J. 1977. Proetida-a disorderly order of trilobites. Lethaia, 10:95105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, E. 1865. Palaeozoic fossils, volume 1. Containing descriptions and figures of new or little known species of organic remains from the Silurian rocks. Geological Survey of Canada, 1861-1865, 426 p.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1980. Ontogenetic studies of Middle Ordovician trilobites from the Esbataottine Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Canada. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 171:174.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., and Ludvigsen, R. 1976. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites from South Nahanni River, District of Mackenzie, Canada. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 167:77119.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., and Speyer, S. E.In press. Ontogeny of the Trilobita. In Whittington, H. B. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropod 1 (2nd edition). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Speyer, S. E., Edgecombe, G. D., and Hunt, A. S. 1990. Larvae and relationships of the Calymenina (Trilobita). Journal of Paleontology, 64:255277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danser, B. H. 1950. A theory of systematics. Bibliotheca Biotheoretica, 4:117180.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1973. Lower Ordovician trilobites from the Summerford Group at Virgin Arm, New World Island, northeastern Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 240:143.Google Scholar
Demeter, E. J. 1973. Lower Ordovician pliomerid trilobites from western Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 20:3565.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 23:449480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D. 1992. Trilobite phylogeny and the Cambrian-Ordovician “event”: cladistic reappraisal, p. 144177. In Novacek, M. J. and Wheeler, Q. D. (eds.), Extinction and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1990. Mackenziurus, a new genus of the Silurian “Encrinurusvariolaris plexus (Trilobita). American Museum of Natural History Novitates, Number 2968, 22 p.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., Chatterton, B. D. E., Vaccari, N. E., and Waisfeld, B. G. 1997. Ontogeny of the proetoid trilobite Stenoplepharum and relationships of a new species from the Upper Ordovician of Argentina. Journal of Paleontology, 71:419433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., Speyer, S. E., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1988. Protaspid larvae and phylogenetics of encrinurid trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 62:779799.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J. 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology. Columbia University Press, New York, 349 p.Google Scholar
Evitt, W. T., and Tripp, R. P. 1977. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites from the families Encrinuridae and Staurocephaliidae. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 157:109174.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1979. Early Ordovician trilobites from the Catoche Formation (St. George Group), Western Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 321:61114.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1980. The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen. III. Remaining trilobites of the Valhallfonna Formation. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter, Number 171, 163 p.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1989. There are extinctions and extinctions: examples from the Lower Palaeozoic. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 325:327355.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology, 33:529576.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., Harper, D. A. T., Ingham, J. K., Owen, A. W., and Rushton, A. W. A. 1995. A revision of Ordovician series and stages from the historical type area. Geological Magazine, 132:1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1988. Classification of the trilobite suborder Asaphina. Palaeontology, 31:165222.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Droser, M. L. 1996. Trilobites at the base of the Middle Ordovician, Western United States. Journal of Paleontology, 70:7399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Morris, S. F. 1978. Discovery of a nauplius-like trilobite larvae. Palaeontology, 21:823833.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J. 1957. Notes on new genera of the Pliomeridae (Trilobites). Journal of Paleontology, 31:811812.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J., and Leanza, A. F. 1957. Ordovician trilobites of Argentina. Special Publications of Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Number 1, 276 p.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 263 p.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F. 1953. Lower Ordovician trilobites from western Utah and eastern Nevada. Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey Bulletin, Number 48, 249 p.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F. 1973. Lower and Middle Ordovician stratigraphic sections in the Ibex Area, Millard County, Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 20:336.Google Scholar
Hu, C.-H. 1971. Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of Lower Paleozoic Trilobita. Palaeontographica Americana, 7:31155.Google Scholar
Hu, C.-H. 1986. Ontogenetic development of Cambrian trilobites from British Columbia and Alberta, Canada (Part II). Journal of Taiwan Museum, 39:144.Google Scholar
Hupé, P. 1953. Classe des trilobites. p. 44246. In Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie. Masson Et Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Kluge, A. G. 1988. The characteristics of ontogeny, p. 5782. In Humphries, C. J. (ed.), Ontogeny and Systematics. Columbia University Press. New York.Google Scholar
Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicarates (Biodae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology, 38:725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jell, P. A. 1985. Tremadoc trilobites of the Digger Island Formation, Waratah Bay, Victoria. Memoirs of Museum Victoria, 46:5388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, P. D. 1971. British Cheiruridae (Trilobita). Palaeontographical Society Monographs, p. 195.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-C., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1996. Terminology of glabellar lobes in trilobite larvae based on homology. Journal of Paleontology, 70:439442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, K. J. 1986. A guide to the nomenclature of heterochrony. Journal of Paleontology, 60:413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyamoto, M. M., and Fitch, W. M. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Systematic Biology, 44:6476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. C., (ed.) 1959. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 566 p.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1937. Trilobiten aus Estland. Sonderabdruck aus Acta et Commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis 52, 163 p.Google Scholar
Platnick, N. I. 1978. Cladograms, phylogenetic trees, and hypothesis testing. Systematic Zoology, 27:438442.Google Scholar
Přibyl, A., Vaněk, J., and Pek, I. 1985. Phylogeny and taxonomy of Family Cheiruridae (Trilobita). Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis, Facultas Rerum Naturalium, Geographica Geologica 24, 83:107193.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1913. Notes on some new and old trilobites in the Victoria Memorial Museum. Bulletin of the Victoria Memorial Museum and Canada Geological Survey, 1:3339.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr. 1951a. Ontogenies of three Garden City (Early Ordovician) trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 25:578586.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr. 1951b. Stratigraphy of the Garden City Formation in northeastern Utah and its trilobite faunas. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University Bulletin 6, 161 p.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr. 1953. Additional Garden City (Early Ordovician) trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 27:633646.Google Scholar
Salter, J. 1864. A monograph of British trilobites from the Cambrian, Silurian and Devonian Formations. Palaeontographical Society Monographs, p. 180.Google Scholar
Schoch, R. M. 1986. Phylogeny Reconstruction in Paleontology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 353 p.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1955. Die fauna der Leimitz-Schiefer (Tremadoc). Abhandlungen Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellschaft, 492:172.Google Scholar
Shaw, F. C. 1968. Early Middle Ordovician Chazy trilobites of New York. New York State Museum Memoir 17, 163 p.Google Scholar
Sloan, R. E. 1991. A chronology of North American Ordovician trilobite genera, p. 165177. In Barnes, C. R. and Williams, S. H. (eds.), Advances in Ordovician geology. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 90-9.Google Scholar
Speyer, S. E., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1989. Trilobite larvae and larval ecology. Historical Biology, 3:2760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terell, F. M. 1973. Silicified trilobite zonation in the Lower Fillmore Formation in western Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 20:6790.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. P. 1993. Review of the trilobites from the Middle Ordovician Barr Group, Girvan district, Scotland. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh; Earth Sciences, 84:87102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1967. The trilobite Anacheirurus frederichi (Salter) from the Tremadoc Series of North Wales. Geological Magazine, 104:284289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1961. Middle Ordovician Pliomeridae (Trilobita) from Nevada, New York, Quebec, Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology, 35:911922.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1963. Middle Ordovician trilobites from Lower Head, western Newfoundland. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 129:1118.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1965. Trilobites of the Ordovician Table Head Formation, western Newfoundland. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 132:275442.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B., and Evitt, W. R. 1954. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites. Geological Society of America Memoir, 59, 137 p.Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O., Siegel-Causey, D., Brooks, D. R., and Funk, V. A. 1991. The Compleat Cladist: A primer of phylogenetic procedures. The University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Special Publication, Number 19, 158 p.Google Scholar
Young, G. E. 1973. An Ordovician (Arenigian) trilobite faunule of great diversity from the Ibex area, western Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 20:91115.Google Scholar