Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:35:27.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mesozoic history and neontology of Lepidoptera in relation to Trichoptera, Mecoptera, and angiosperms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Oakley Shields
Oakley Shields*
Affiliation:
4890 Old Highway, Mariposa, California 95338
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mesozoic history of Lepidoptera and Trichoptera is reviewed and their phylogeny traced back to early Mesozoic specialized Permochoristidae Mecoptera. Queensland emerges as the center of origin for the earliest Lepidoptera and Trichoptera and is also the region where the first lepidopteran hostplants, primitive dicot angiosperms, arose from Glossopteridae, probably at the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. Protomecoptera evolved from extinct Protoblattodea (not Neuroptera) during Late Carboniferous or Early Permian time. The first Lepidoptera, terrestrial Agathiphagidae, evolved from aquatic Necrotauliidae Trichoptera probably at the close of the Triassic when an extreme drought dried up many streams. The very small size of Amphiesmenopteran Mecoptera and the first Trichoptera and Lepidoptera fossils obeys Cope's Rule.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , March 1988 , pp. 251 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, C. A. 1963. Cordaites-type foliage associated with palm-like plants from the Upper Triassic of south-western Colorado. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society, 42A:4–9.Google Scholar
Ash, S. R. 1976. Occurrence of the controversial plant fossil Sanmiguelia in the Upper Triassic of Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 50:799–804.Google Scholar
Axelrod, D. I. 1959. Evidence for a tropical center of angiosperm evolution. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 70:1707.Google Scholar
Bancroft, H. 1930. The arborescent habit in angiosperms, a review. New Phytologist, 29:153–169, 227-275.Google Scholar
Beardsley, T. 1986. Fossil bird shakes evolutionary hypotheses. Nature, 322:677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. F. 1971. New plant structures from the Triassic Dolores Formation in southwestern Colorado. American Journal of Botany, 58:467–468.Google Scholar
Bock, W. 1969. The American Triassic flora and global distribution. Geological Center Research Series, 3 and 4, 406 p.Google Scholar
Bock, W. J. 1985. The arboreal theory for the origin of birds, p. 199–207. In Hecht, M. K. et al. (eds.), The Beginnings of Birds. Eichstatt Publishing, Willibaldsburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Botosaneanu, L., and Wichard, W. 1983. Upper-Cretaceous Siberian and Canadian amber caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera). Bijdragen Dierkunde, 53:187–217.Google Scholar
Botosaneanu, L. 1984. Upper-Cretaceous amber Trichoptera. Proceedings 4th International Symposium Trichoptera, Clemson, South Carolina, 1983:43–48.Google Scholar
Boudreaux, H. B. 1981. About the parorpoid complex. Entomological Society of America Annals, 74:155–157.Google Scholar
Byers, G. W. 1971. Ecological distribution and structural adaptation in the classification of Mecoptera. Proceedings 13th International Congress Entomology, Moscow, 1:486.Google Scholar
Byers, G. W. 1973. Zoogeography of the Meropeidae (Mecoptera). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 46:511–516.Google Scholar
Carey, S. W. 1976. The Expanding Earth. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 488 p.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1950. The Lower Permian insects of Kansas, Pt. 10. The order Protorthoptera: the family Liomopteridae and its relatives. American Academy Arts and Sciences Proceedings, 78(4):185–219.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1953. The geological history and evolution of insects. American Scientist, 41:256–263.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1972. The affinities of Eomerope and Dinopanorpa (Mecoptera). Psyche, 79:79–87.Google Scholar
Carruthers, W. 1867. On an Aroideous fruit from the Stonefield Slate. Geological Magazine, 4:146–147.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. J. 1913. Macrozamia moorei, a connecting link between living and fossil cycads. Botanical Gazette, 55:141–154.Google Scholar
Cheadle, V. I. 1953. Independent origin of vessels in the monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Phytomorphology, 3:23–44.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1917. Some American fossil insects. United States National Museum Proceedings, 51:89–106.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1924. Fossils in the Ondai Sair Formation, Mongolia. American Museum National History Bulletin, 51:129–144.Google Scholar
Colbert, E. H. 1958. Tetrapod extinctions at the end of the Triassic Period. National Academy Sciences Proceedings, 44:973–977.Google Scholar
Common, I. F. B. 1973. A new family of Dacnonypha (Lepidoptera) based on three new species from southern Australia, with notes on the Agathiphagidae. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 12:11–23.Google Scholar
Common, I. F. B. 1975. Evolution and classification of the Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 20:183–203.Google Scholar
Cornet, B. 1979. Recognition of pre-Cretaceous angiosperm pollen and its relationship to fossil polyplicate pollen, p. 7–9. Twelfth Annual Meeting, American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists, Technical Sessions, Abstracts with Program.Google Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1920. A comparison of the external anatomy of the lower Lepidoptera and Trichoptera from the standpoint of phylogeny. Psyche, 27:23–34.Google Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1930. The wings of the remarkable archaic Mecopteran Notiothauma reedi McLachlan with remarks on their protoblattoid affinities. Psyche, 37:83–103.Google Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1931. The genitalia and terminal structures of the male of the archaic mecopteran, Notiothauma reedi, compared with related Holometabola from the standpoint of phylogeny. Psyche, 38:1–21Google Scholar
Crepet, W. L. 1984. Advanced (constant) insect pollination mechanisms: pattern of evolution and implications vis-à-vis angiosperm diversity. Missouri Botanical Garden Annals, 71:607–630.Google Scholar
Cronquist, A. 1969. Broad features of the system of angiosperms. Taxon, 18:188–193.Google Scholar
Crowell, J. C., and Frakes, L. A. 1970. Phanerozoic glaciation and the causes of ice ages. American Journal of Science, 268:193–224.Google Scholar
Delevoryas, T., and Hope, R. C. 1971. A new Triassic cycad and its phyletic implications. Postilla, 150:1–8.Google Scholar
Delevoryas, T., and Person, C. P. 1975. Mexiglossa varia gen. et sp. nov., a new genus of glossopteroid leaves from the Jurassic of Oaxaca, Mexico. Palaeontographica, 154, Abt. B:114–120.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. A., and Donoghue, M. J. 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Botanical Review, 52:321–431.Google Scholar
Dumbleton, L. J. 1952. A new genus of seed-infesting micropterygid moths. Pacific Science, 6:17–29.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. G., Sharma, G. K., and Campbell, C. C. 1965. Stomatal patterns of dicotyledons and monocotyledons. American Midland Naturalist, 74:185–195.Google Scholar
Evans, G. M., and Rees, H. 1971. Mitotic cycles in dicotyledons and monocotyledons. Nature, 233:350–351.Google Scholar
Florin, R. 1963. The distribution of conifer and taxad genera in time and space. Acta Horti Bergiani, 20:121–312, 319-326.Google Scholar
Fox, R. M., and Fox, J. W. 1964. Introduction to Comparative Entomology. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 450 p.Google Scholar
Friedlander, M. 1984. Phylogenetic branching of Trichoptera and Lepidoptera: an analysis on comparative spermatology. Proceedings 4th International Symposium Trichoptera, Clemson, South Carolina, 1983:145.Google Scholar
Gall, L. F., and Tiffney, B. H. 1983. A fossil noctuid moth egg from the Late Cretaceous of eastern North America. Science, 219:507–509.Google Scholar
Gibbs, G. W. 1983. Evolution of Micropterigidae (Lepidoptera) in the SW Pacific. GeoJournal, 7:505–510.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1977. Patterns of evolution in the mammalian record, p. 469–500. In Hallam, A. (ed.), Patterns of Evolution as Illustrated by the Fossil Record. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Greguss, P. 1965. The relationships of Cycadales on the basis of their xylotomy, branching and leaf epidermis. Palaeobotanist, 14:94–101.Google Scholar
Haines, R. W. 1958. Arboreal or terrestrial ancestry of placental mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 33:1–23.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1981. The end-Triassic bivalve extinction event. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 35:1–44.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1981. Insect Phylogeny. Translated by Pont, A. C.John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 514 p.Google Scholar
Hickey, L. J., and Doyle, J. A. 1977. Early Cretaceous fossil evidence for angiosperm evolution. Botanical Review, 43:3–104.Google Scholar
Hughes, N. F. 1977. Palaeo-succession of earliest angiosperm evolution. Botanical Review, 43:105–127.Google Scholar
Issiki, S. T. 1931. On the morphology and systematics of Micropterygidae of Japan and Formosa, with some considerations on the Australian, European, and North American forms. Zoological Society London Proceedings, 1931:999–1039.Google Scholar
Jarzembowski, E. A. 1984. Early Cretaceous insects from southern England. Modern Geology, 9:71–93.Google Scholar
Jefferson, T. H. 1980. Angiosperm fossils in supposed Jurassic volcanogenic shales, Antarctica. Nature, 285:157–158.Google Scholar
Killington, F. J. 1933. A new genus and species of Meropeidae (Mecoptera) from Australia. Entomologists' Monthly Magazine, 69:1–4.Google Scholar
Klingstedt, H. 1937. Chromosome behaviour and phylogeny in the Neuroptera. Nature, 139:468–469.Google Scholar
Krassilov, V. 1973. Mesozoic plants and the problem of angiosperm ancestry. Lethaia, 6:163–178.Google Scholar
Krassilov, V. 1977. The origin of angiosperms. Botanical Review, 43:143–176.Google Scholar
Kristensen, N. P. 1968. The morphological and functional evolution of the mouthparts in adult Lepidoptera. Opuscula Entomologica, 33(1, 2):69–72.Google Scholar
Kristensen, N. P. 1984a. Studies on the morphology and sytematics of primitive Lepidoptera. Steenstrupia, 10:141–191.Google Scholar
Kristensen, N. P. 1984b. The male genitalia of Agathiphaga (Lepidoptera, Agathiphagidae) and the lepidopteran ground plan. Entomologica Scandinavica, 15:151–178.Google Scholar
Kristensen, N. P. 1984c. The larval head of Agathiphaga (Lepidoptera, Agathiphagidae) and the lepidopteran ground plan. Systematic Entomology, 9:63–81Google Scholar
Kristensen, N. P., and Nielsen, E. S. 1979. A new subfamily of micropterigid moths from South America. A contribution to the morphology and phylogeny of the Micropterigidae, with a generic catalogue of the family. Steenstrupia, 5:69–147.Google Scholar
Kristensen, N. P., and Nielsen, E. S. 1983. The Heterobathmia life history elucidated: immature stages contradict assignment to suborder Zeugloptera. Zeitschrift Zoologische Systematik Evolutionsforshung, 21:101–124.Google Scholar
Lee, C., and McCabe, R. 1986. The Banda-Celebes-Sulu basin: a trapped piece of Cretaceous-Eocene oceanic crust? Nature, 322:51–54.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. E. 1970. Fossil caddisfly cases (Trichoptera) from the Cobb's Creek site (Cretaceous) near New Ulm, Minnesota. Entomological Society of America Annals, 63:1779–1780.Google Scholar
Makino, S. 1951. An Atlas of the Chromosome Numbers in Animals, 2nd ed. The Iowa State College Press, Ames, 290 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martynova, O. M. 1949. Mesozoic Neuroptera. Trudy Paleontolog. Instituta Akademiya Nauk S.S.S.R., 20:150–170 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Melville, R. 1975. The distribution of Australian relict plants and its bearing on angiosperm evolution. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 71:67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, R. 1982. The biogeography of Nothofagus and Trigonobalanus and the origin of the Fagaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 85:75–88.Google Scholar
Melville, R. 1983. Glossopteridae, Angiospermidae and the evidence for angiosperm origin. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 86:279–323.Google Scholar
Mickoleit, G. 1971. Das Exoskelet von Notiothauma reedi Mac-Lachlan, ein Beitrag zur Morphologie und Phylogenie der Mecoptera (Insecta). Zeitschrift Morphologie Tiere, 69:318–362.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. S. 1982. Review of the higher classification of the Lepidoptera, with special reference to lower Heteroneurans. Tyo to Ga, 33(1, 2):98–101.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. S. 1985. Primitive (non-ditrysian) Lepidoptera of the Andes: diversity, distribution, biology and phylogenetic relationships. Journal Research Lepidoptera, Supplement No. 1:1–16.Google Scholar
Oishi, S. 1930. On Fraxinopsis Wieland and Yabeiella Oishi, gen. nov. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography, 8:259–267.Google Scholar
Olsen, P. E., Remington, C. L., Cornet, B., and Thomson, K. S. 1978. Cyclic change in Late Triassic lacustrine communities. Science, 201:729–733.Google Scholar
Pena, G. L. E. 1968. Natural history notes on Notiothauma. Discovery, 4(1):42–44.Google Scholar
Penny, N. D. 1975. Evolution of the extant Mecoptera. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 48:331–350.Google Scholar
Plumstead, E. P. 1958. The habit of growth of Glossopteridae. Geological Society South Africa Transactions, 61:81–94.Google Scholar
Plumstead, E. P. 1962. Fossil floras of Antarctica. Trans-Antarctic Expedition 1955-1958, Scientific Reports, 9, 154 p.Google Scholar
Plumstead, E. P. 1973a. The late Paleozoic Glossopteris flora, p. 187–205. In Hallam, A. (ed.), Atlas of Palaeobiogeography. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 531 p.Google Scholar
Plumstead, E. P. 1973b. The enigmatic Glossopteris flora and uniformitarianism, p. 413–424. In Tarling, D. H. and Runcorn, S. K. (eds.), Implications of Continental Drift to the Earth Sciences, Vol. 1. Academic Press, London and New York, 622 p.Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G., and Rasnitsyn, A. P. 1974. New Mesozoic and Cenozoic Protomecoptera. Paleontological Journal, 8:493–507.Google Scholar
Powell, J. A. 1980. Evolution of larval food preferences in Microlepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 25:133–159.Google Scholar
Razowski, J. 1974. Phylogeny and classification of Lepidoptera. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 19:1–18.Google Scholar
Regal, P. J. 1977. Ecology and evolution of flowering plant dominance. Science, 177:622–629.Google Scholar
Retallack, G. J. 1977. Reconstructing Triassic vegetation of eastern Australasia: a new approach for the biostratigraphy of Gondwanaland. Alcheringa, 1:247–278.Google Scholar
Retallack, G. J., and Dilcher, D. L. 1981. Arguments for a glossopterid ancestry of angiosperms. Paleobiology, 7:54–67.Google Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1953. Fossil mecopteroid insects from the Upper Permian of New South Wales. Records of the Australian Museum, 23:55–88.Google Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1955. Fossil insects from the Triassic beds at Mt. Crosby, Queensland. Australian Journal of Zoology, 3:654–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1956. A re-examination of the mecopteroid and orthopteroid fossils (Insecta) from the Triassic beds at Denmark Hill, Queensland, with descriptions of further specimens. Australian Journal of Zoology, 4:98–110.Google Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1967. Structures of unknown, possibly stridulatory, function on the wings and body of Neuroptera; with an appendix on other endopterygote orders. Australian Journal of Zoology, 15:337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1970a. Lower Cretaceous fleas. Nature, 227:746–747.Google Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1970b. Origin of the Australian insect fauna, p. 593–598. In Proceedings and Papers, Second Gondwana Symposium, South Africa, July to August, 1970. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, 689 p.Google Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1976. New Upper Permian insects from Natal, South Africa. Natal Museum Annals, 22:755–789.Google Scholar
Rohdendorf, B. B. 1968. Jurassic Insects of Karatau. Moscow, Akadamie Nauk S.S.S.R. (Division General Biology), 252 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Ross, H. H. 1958. The Cretaceous caddisfly, Dolophilus praemissus Cockerell. Proceedings 10th International Congress on Entomology, Montreal, 1956, 1:849.Google Scholar
Ross, H. H. 1967. The evolution and past dispersal of the Trichoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 12:169–206.Google Scholar
Rouse, G. E. 1959. Plant microfossils from Kootenay coal-measures strata of British Columbia. Micropaleontology, 5:303–324.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C. 1931. Plant Life through the Ages. The University Press, Cambridge, 601 p.Google Scholar
Shields, O. 1983. Trans-Pacific biotic links that suggest earth expansion, p. 199–205. In Carey, S. W. (ed.), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, 423 p.Google Scholar
Skalski, A. W. 1979a. Records of oldest Lepidoptera. Nota Lepidopterologica, 2:61–66.Google Scholar
Skalski, A. W. 1979b. A new member of the family Micropterigidae (Lepidoptera) from the Lower Cretaceous of Transbaikalia. Paleontological Journal, 13:206–214.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1973. An explanation for Cope's Rule. Evolution, 27:1–26.Google Scholar
Stekol'nikov, A. A. 1967. Functional morphology of the copulatory apparatus in the primitive Lepidoptera and general evolutionary trends in the genitalia of the Lepidoptera. Entomological Review, 46:400–409.Google Scholar
Suessenguth, K. 1950. The flora of Australia as a measure of the antiquity of the angiosperms. Pacific Science, 4:287–308.Google Scholar
Suomalainen, E. 1966. Achiasmatische oogenese bei Trichopteren. Chromosoma, Berlin, 18:201–207.Google Scholar
Suomalainen, E. 1969. Chromosome evolution in the Lepidoptera, p. 132–138. In Darlington, C. D. and Lewis, K. R. (eds.), Chromosomes Today, Vol. 2. Plenum Press, New York, 285 p.Google Scholar
Thorne, R. F. 1976. Where and when might the tropical angiospermous flora have originated? Singapore Botanical Garden Bulletin, 29:183–189.Google Scholar
Tidwell, W. D., Simper, A. D., and Thayn, G. F. 1977. Additional information concerning the controversial Triassic plant: Sanmiguelia. Palaeontographica, 163, Abt. B:143–151.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1919a. The Panorpoid complex, Pt. 3: The wing venation. Linnean Society of New South Wales Proceedings, 44:533–718.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1919b. Mesozoic insects of Queensland. No. 5. Mecoptera, the new order Paratrichoptera, and additions to Planipenna. Linnean Society of New South Wales Proceedings, 44:194–212.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1933. The Panorpoid complex in the British Rhaetic and Lias. British Museum (Natural History), Fossil Insects No. 3, 79 p.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1935. The evolution of the scorpion-flies and their derivatives (order Mecoptera). Entomological Society of America Annals, 28:1–45.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1937. The ancestors of the Diptera. Nature, 139:66–67.Google Scholar
Tindale, N. B. 1945. Triassic insects of Queensland. 1. Eoses, a probable lepidopterous insect from the Triassic beds of Mt. Crosby, Queensland. Royal Society of Queensland Proceedings, 61(5):37–46.Google Scholar
Tindale, N. B. 1980. Origin of the Lepidoptera, with description of a new mid-Triassic species and notes on the origin of the butterfly stem. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, 34:263–285.Google Scholar
Tindale, N. B. 1981. The origin of the Lepidoptera relative to Australia, p. 955–976. In Keast, A. (ed.), Ecological Biogeography of Australia. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
Townrow, J. A. 1969. Some lower Mesozoic Podocarpaceae and Araucariaceae, p. 159–184. In Gondwana Stratigraphy, IUGS Symposium, Buenos Aires, 1-15 October 1967. UNESCO, 1173 p.Google Scholar
Webb, J. A. 1981. Cuticle morphology of the Triassic species of Nilssonia from eastern Australia. Proceedings 13th International Botanical Congress, Sydney, p. 203.Google Scholar
Whalley, P. 1978. New taxa of fossil and recent Micropterigidae with a discussion of their evolution and a comment on the evolution of Lepidoptera. Transvaal Museum Annals, 31(8):71–86.Google Scholar
Whalley, P. 1986. A review of the current fossil evidence of Lepidoptera in the Mesozoic. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 28:253–271.Google Scholar
Wieland, G. R. 1926. South American fossil insect discovery. American Journal of Science, 5th Series, 12:130–135.Google Scholar
Wille, A. 1960. The phylogeny and relationships between the insect orders. Revista Biologia Tropicale, 8:93–123.Google Scholar
Willmann, V. R. 1979. Über das Exoskelett von Austromerope poultoni Killington (Mecoptera: Meropeidae), ein Beitrag zur Phylogenie der Schnabelfliegen. Zeitschrift Zoologische Systematik Evolutionsforshung, 17:296–309.Google Scholar