Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:04:04.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generic concepts in the Platycrinitidae Austin and Austin, 1842 (class Crinoidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

William I. Ausich  and
Thomas W. Kammer
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
1School of Earth Sciences, 155 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210,
Thomas W. Kammer
Affiliation:
2Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-6300,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Platycrinites is traditionally one of the more recognizable crinoids, a camerate crinoid with very few if any fixed brachials or interradials and a helically twisted column. Accordingly, many taxa have been assigned to this genus. With a better understanding of the Platycrinitidae, these characters actually unite the family Platycrinitidae rather than the genus. Further, use of different genus-diagnostic characters in Western Europe versus North America has resulted in a confused systematics for this important late Paleozoic family. Here, we objectively define genera within the Platycrinitidae and assign all species to either newly defined or newly named genera. A phylogenetic hypothesis, incorporating both parsimony-based character analysis and stratigraphic ranges, of the genera within the Platycrinitidae is presented.

With consideration of the type species, Platycrinites laevis Miller, 1821, Platycrinites sensu stricto is distinguished from Platycrinites sensu lato, which is used for species that cannot be assigned with confidence to any objectively defined genus. New genera are Artaocrinus n. gen., Collicrinus n. gen., Elegantocrinus n. gen., and Laticrinus n. gen.; and Exsulacrinus Bowsher and Strimple, 1986 is designated a junior synonym of Platycrinites s.s. Collicrinus shumardi n. gen. and sp., Laticrinus oweni n. gen. and sp., and Laticrinus wachsmuthi n. gen. and sp. are described; and Platycrinites formosus approximatus (Miller and Gurley, 1896a) is designated a junior synonym of Platycrinites formosus (Miller and Gurley, 1895a), which is reassigned here to Collicrinus n. gen. Platycrinites s.s. now includes 14 species and species-level taxa, and 76 species are assigned to Platycrinites s.l. Ten species are designated nomina dubia, as are taxa based solely on columnals or pluricolumnals. Two species are designated nomina nuda, and two are transferred to genera outside of the Platycrinitidae. In addition, twenty-seven species and four open-nomenclature taxa are each reassigned to a different genus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 83 , Issue 5 , September 2009 , pp. 694 - 717
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W. I. and Kammer, T. W. 1990. Systematics and phylogeny of the late Osagean and Meramecian crinoids Platycrinites and Eucladocrinus from the Mississippian stratotype region. Journal of Paleontology, 64:759–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Kammer, T. W. 2006. Stratigraphic and Geographic Distribution of Lower Carboniferous Crinoidea from England and Wales. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 56(2):91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Kammer, T. W. 2008. Generic concepts in the Amphoracrinidae Bather, 1899 (Class Crinoidea) and evaluation of generic concepts of North American species. Journal of Paleontology, 82:1139–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Sevastopulo, G. D. 2001. Lower Carboniferous (Tournaisian) crinoids from Hook Head, County Wexford, Ireland. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society 617, 136 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., Brett, C. E., Hess, H., and Simms, M. J. 1999. Crinoid form and function, p. 3–30. In Hess, H., Ausich, W. I., Brett, C. E., and Simms, M. J., Fossil Crinoids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, T. Sr. and Austin, T. Jr. 1842. XVIII. - Proposed arrangement of the Echinodermata, particularly as regards the Crinoidea, and a subdivision of the Class Adelostella (Echinidae). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 1, 10(63):106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, T. Sr. and Austin, T. Jr. 1843-1847. A monograph on recent and fossil Crinoidea, with figures and descriptions of some Recent and fossil allied genera, 1(2):1–32(1843); 1(3):33-48 (1844); 1(4):49-64 (1845); 1(5):65-80 (1846); 1(6-8):81-128 (1847). London and Bristol.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper 45, 734 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowsher, A. L. and Strimple, H. L. 1986. Platycrinites and associated crinoids from Pennsylvanian rocks of the Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Circular 197, 37 p.Google Scholar
Breimer, A. 1962. A monograph on Spanish Paleozoic Crinoidea. Overdruk uit Leidse Geologische Mededelingen, Deel, 27, 190 p.Google Scholar
Broadhead, T. W. and Strimple, H. L. 1977. Permian platycrinitid crinoids from Arctic North America. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14:1166–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1969. Crinoids, p. 475–543. In McKee, E. D. and Gutschick, R. C., History of the Redwall Limestone of northern Arizona. Geological Society of America Memoir 114.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. and Bein, J. 1971. Some lower Carboniferous crinoids from New South Wales. Journal of Paleontology, 45:419–436.Google Scholar
Chen, Z.-T. 1984. Platycrinitidae of Early Carboniferous epoch in west Yunnan. Yunnan Geology, 3(4):370–375.Google Scholar
Chen, Z.-T. and Yao, J.-H. 1993. Palaeozoic echinoderm fossils of western Yunnan, China. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 102 p.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. and Westhead, S. 1987. Platycrinites contractus (Gilbertson) and a new Platycrinites from the Lower Carboniferous of northern England. Proceedings of the Geological Association, 98:211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etheridge, R. 1892. The organic remains of the Permo-Carboniferous System (Chap. 22). The organic remains of the Rolling Downs Formation (Chap. 32). The organic remains of the Desert Sandstone Formation (Chap. 34). Palaeontology of New Guinea (Chap. 39). In Jack, R. L., and Etheridge, R. Jr., The geology and palaeontology of Queensland and New Guinea: J. C. Beal, Brisbane, 2 vols, 768 p., 67 pl.Google Scholar
Frest, T. J. and Strimple, H. L. 1977a. Hirneacrinidae (new), simple Silurian camerate crinoids from the North American continental interior. Journal of Paleontology, 51:1181–1200.Google Scholar
Frest, T. J. and Strimple, H. L. 1977b. Prokopicrinidae, new family of? camerate crinoids, Silurian (Wenlockian - Ludlowvian), Tennessee and Oklahoma. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 67:144–154.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, G. A. 1826-1844. Petrefacta Germaniae, tam ea, Quae in Museo Universitatis Regiae Borussicae Fridericiae Wilhelmiae Rhenanea, serventur, quam alia quaecunque in Museis Hoeninghusiano Muensteriano aliisque, extant, iconibus et descriiptionns illustrata. –Abbildungen und Beschreibungen der Petrefacten Deutschlands und der Angränzende Länder, unter Mitwirkung des Hern Grafen Georg zu Münster, herausgegeben von August Goldfuss. v. 1 (1826-1833), Divisio prima. Zoophytorum reliquiae, p. 1–114; Divisio secunda. Radiariorum reliquiae, p. 115-221 [Echinodermata]; Divisio tertia. Annulatorium reliquiae, p. 222-242; v. 2 (1834-1840), Divisio quarta. Molluscorum acephalicorum reliquiae. I. Bivalvia, p. 65-286; II. Brachiopoda, p. 287-303; III. (1841-1844), Divisio quinta. Molluscorum gasteropodum reliquiae, Arnz & Co., Düsseldorf, 121 p. [1:1-76 (1826), 77-164 (1829), 165-240 (1831), 241-252 (1833); 2:1-68 (1833), 69-140 (1836), 141-224 (1837), 225-312 (1840); 3:1-128 (1844)]Google Scholar
Goldfuss, G. A. 1839. Beitäge zur Petrefactenkunde, Acta Natur. Curiosorum. Nova Acta Physico-medica Academie Caesar Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum, 19:329–364.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Chapter 8. Palaeontology of Iowa, p. 473–724. In Hall, J. and Whitney, J. D., Report of the Geological Survey of the state of Iowa: Embracing the results of investigations made during portions of the years 1855, 56 &: 57, v. 1, part II; Palaeontology, p. 473-724, 29 pl., index to Part II separately paginated, 3 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1859. Contributions to the palaeontology of Iowa, being descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils. Supplement to vol. I, part II, of the Geological Report of Iowa, 92 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1861a. Descriptions of new species of crinoidea; from investigations of the Iowa Geological Survey, Preliminary notice. C. van Benthuysen, Albany, New York, 18 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1861b. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Journal of the Boston Society of Natural History, 3:261–328.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1863. Preliminary notice, of some species of Crinoidea from the Waverly Sandstone series of Summit Co., Ohio, supposed to be of the age of the Chemung Group of New York. Preprint of Seventeenth Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the state of New-York, on the Condition of the State Cabinet of Natural History, and the Historical and Antiquarian Collection annexed thereto, State of New York in Senate Document 189. Comstock and Cassiday Printers, Albany:50–60.Google Scholar
Hall, J. and Whitfield, R. P. 1875. Descriptions of invertebrate fossils, mainly from the Silurian System, Crinoidea of the Waverly Group. Ohio Geological Survey Report, volume 2, Geology and Palaeontology, pt. 2, Palaeontology: 162–179.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. and Clayton, G. 2005. Official names of the Carboniferous System. Geology Today, 21:213–214.Google Scholar
Hotledahl, O. 1911. Zur Kenntnis der Karbonablagerungen des Westlichen Spitzbergens I. Eine Fauna der Moskauer Stufe. Kristiania, Videnskabsselskabets Skrifter I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse 1911, 10, 46 p.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1895. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der palaeozoischen Crinoiden Deutschlands. Paläontologisches Abhandlungen, 7(3):1–116.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1898. Über einige paläozoische Gattungen von Crinoiden. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologishen Gesellschaft, Verhandlungen Jahrgang 1897, 49:44–48.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 2007. Stratigraphical and geographical distribution of Mississippian Crinoidea from Scotland. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 98:139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Springer, G. S. 2008. Biostratigraphy of crinoids from the Wymps Gap Member of the Greenbrier Formation (Mississippian, Chesterian) in northern West Virginia. Journal of Paleontology, 82:1182–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, C. R. 1894. Paleontology of Missouri, part I. Missouri Geological Survey, 4:143–225.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1946. Plemnocrinus, a new crinoid genus from the Lower Mississippian. Journal of Paleontology, 20:435–441.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G. de and le Hon, H. 1854. Recherches sur les crinoides du terrain carbonifere de la Belgique. Academie Royal de Belgique Memoir, 28(3), 215 p.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1978. Family Platycrinitidae Austin and Austin, 1842, p. T515–T516. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, K. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Echinodermata, Pt. T(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder and Lawrence.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G., Waters, J. A., Maples, C. G., Marcus, S. A., and Liao, Z.-T. 1996. A camerate-rich Late Carboniferous (Moscovian) crinoid fauna from volcanic conglomerate, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China. Journal of Paleontology, 70:117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, N. G., Waters, J. A., and Maples, C. G. 1997. Echinoderm faunas of the Hongguleleng Formation, Late Devonian (Famennian), Xinjiang-Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. Journal of Paleontology Memoir, 47(Supplement to 71(2)), 43 p.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G., Maples, C. G., and Waters, J. A. 2001a. Revision of Struniancrinoids and blastoids from Germany. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 75(2):233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, N. G., Maples, C. G., and Waters, J. A. 2001b. Revision of some Late Devonian (Famennian) and some Early Carboniferous (Tournaisian) crinoids and blastoids from the type Devonian area of North Devon. Palaeontology, 44:1043–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudon, L. R. 1933. The stratigraphy and paleontology of the Gilmore City Formation of Iowa. University of Iowa Studies 15, 74 p.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R. and Beane, B. H. 1937. The crinoid fauna of the Hampton Formation at LeGrand, Iowa. University of Iowa Studies, 17:227–272.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R. and Severson, J. L. 1953. New crinoid fauna, Mississippian, Lodgepole Formation, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 27:505–536.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., Parks, J. M., and Spreng, A. C. 1952. Mississippian crinoid fauna from the Banff Formation Sunwapta Pass, Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, 26:544–575.Google Scholar
Marez-Oyens, F. A. H. W. de. 1940. Platycrinus tuberculatus Oyens, a correction. Geological Magazine, 77:253–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McChesney, J. H. 1859. Descriptions of new species of fossils from the Palaeozoic rocks of the western states. Extract Transactions of the Chicago Academy of Sciences, 1, 76 p.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1844. In Griffith, R., A synopsis of the characters of the Carboniferous limestone fossils of Ireland. University Press, Dublin, Ireland, 274 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1849. On some new Paleozoic Echinodermata. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 2, 3:244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1872. Preliminary list of the fossils collected by Dr. Hayden's exploring expedition of 1871, in Utah and Wyoming territories, with descriptions of a few new species, p. 373–377. In Hayden, F. V., Preliminary report of the U.S. Geological Survey of Montana and portions of adjacent territories, preliminary report (fifth annual) (1871).Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1873. Lists of fossils collected, p. 463–378. In Hayden, F. V., Sixth Annual Report of the U.S. Geological Survey of the territories, embracing portions of Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and Utah.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1861. Descriptions of new Palaeozoic fossils from Illinois and Iowa. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 13:128–148.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1865. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea, etc. from the Paleozoic rocks of Illinois and some of the adjoining states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 17:143–155.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1869. Descriptions of new Carboniferous fossils from the western states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 21:137–172.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1873. Palaeontology, Descriptions of invertebrates from Carboniferous System. Illinois Geological Survey, 5(2):323–619.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A natural history of the Crinoidea, or lily-shaped animals; with observations on the genera, Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites. Bryan & Co., Bristol, England, 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1881. Subcarboniferous fossils from the Lake Valley Mining District of New Mexico, with descriptions of new species. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 4:306–315.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American geology and paleontology. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, 664 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1891a. A description of some Lower Carboniferous crinoids. Geological Survey of Missouri Bulletin 4, 40 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1891b. Palaeontology. Advance sheets. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources, 17th Annual Report, 103 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1892. North American geology and paleontology, first appendix. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati: 665–718.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1897. Second appendix to North American geology and palaeontology. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati:719–793.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1894. New genera and species of Echinodermata. Illinois State Museum Bulletin 5, 53 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1895a. New and interesting species of Palaeozoic fossils. Illinois State Museum Bulletin 7, 89 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1895b. Description of new species of Palaeozoic Echinodermata. Illinois State Museum Bulletin 6, 62 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896a. New species of crinoids from Illinois and other states. Illinois State Museum Bulletin 9, 66 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896b. Description of new and remarkable fossils from the Palaeozoic rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Illinois State Museum Bulletin 8, 65 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1897. New species of crinoids, cephalopods, and other Palaeozoic fossils. Illinois State Museum Bulletin 12, 69 p.Google Scholar
Minato, M. 1951. On the Lower Carboniferous fossils of the Kitakami Massif, NE Honsyu, Japan. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, series 4, 7:355–382.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1952. Crinoids, p. 604–652. In Moore, R. C., Lalicker, C. G., and Fischer, A. G., Invertebrate Fossils. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Jeffords, R. M. 1968. Classification and nomenclature of fossil crinoids based on studies of dissociated parts of their columns. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, Article 9, 86 p.Google Scholar
Münster, G. G. 1839-1846. Beschreibung einiger neuen Crinoideen aus der Uebergangs-formation. Beitrage zur Petrefacten-Kunde, 1:31–34.Google Scholar
Newmayr, M. 1889. Die Stämme des Thierreiches, Band 1, Wirbellose Thiere. Verlag von F. Tempsky & Tempsky, Wien, Prag, 6, 603 p.Google Scholar
Owen, D. D. and Shumard, B. F. 1850. Descriptions of fifteen new species of Crinoidea from the Subcarboniferous limestone of Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota in the years 1848-1849. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, series 2, 2:57–70.Google Scholar
Owen, D. D. and Shumard, B. F. 1852. Descriptions of seven new species of Crinoidea from the Subcarboniferous of Iowa and Illinois. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, series 2, 2:89–94.Google Scholar
Pareyn, C. 1961. Les massifs carboniféres du Sahara sud-oranais. v. 2 Paléontologie stratigraphique. Publications du Centre de Recherches Sahariennes Série Géologie, 1, 324 p., 2, 244 p.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1836. Illustrations of the geology of Yorkshire, or a description of the strata and organic remains, Part. 2, The Mountain Limestone districts, 2nd edition. John Murray, London: 203–208.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1841. Figures and Descriptions of the Palaeozoic Fossils of Cornwall, Devon, and West Somerset; Observed in the Course of the Ordnance Geological Survey of that District. Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, London, 231 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quenstedt, F. A. 1874-1876. Petrefactenkunde Deutschlands, Erst Abtheilung, Vierter (4) Band, Echinodermen (Astenden und Encriniden), p. 1–742(1876); Atlas zu de Echiniden, pl. 62-89 (1874); Atlas zu den Astenden und Encriniden, pl. 90-114 (1876), Fues's Verlag, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Roemer, C. F. 1850. Über Stephanocrinus, eine fossile Crinoiden-Gattung aus der Familie der Cystideen. Wiegmanns Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Jahrgang 16, 1:365–375.Google Scholar
Roemer, C. F. 1866. Die silurische Fauna des westlichen Tennessee, eine paläontologische Monographie. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefakten-kunde: 759–763.Google Scholar
Rollins, H. B. and Brezinski, D. K. 1988. Reinterpretation of crinoidplatyceratid interaction. Lethaia, 21:207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, R. R. 1903. Description of fossils, p. 98–109. In Green, G. K., Contribution to Indiana Palaeontology. New Albany, Indiana, Part 12.Google Scholar
Rowley, R. R. 1908. The geology of Pike County. Missouri Bureau Geology and Mines, series 2, 8, 124 p.Google Scholar
Rowley, R. R. and Hare, S. J. 1891a. Description of some new species of Echinodermata from the Sub-carboniferous rocks of Pike County, Mo. Kansas City Scientist, 5(7):97–103.Google Scholar
Rowley, R. R. and Hare, S. J. 1891b. Description of some new species of crinoids and blastoids from the Sub-carboniferous rocks of Pike and Marion Counties, Mo., and Scott County, Va. Kansas City Scientist, 5(8):113–118.Google Scholar
Sandberger, F. 1845. Kurze Bemerkungen zu der Schrift von F. A. Roemer: “Die Versteinerungen des Harz-Gebirges.” Leonhard n. Bronn. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie:427–441.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. E. 1930. Die Echinodermen des deutschen Unterkarbons. Abhandlungen der Preussichen Geologischen Landesanstalt, new series, 122(1):1–92.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1865-1866. Catalogue of Palaeozoic fossils, Part 1, Echinodermata. Transactions of the St. Louis Academy Science, 2(2):334–394, 1865; 395-407, 1866.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1900. Fossils in the Oxford University Museum. II. On two new genera and species of Crinoidea (Brahmacrinus ponderosus and Cicerocrinus elegans). Quarterly Journal of the London Geological Society, 56:264–272.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1926a. American Silurian crinoids. Smithsonian Institution Publication 2872, 239 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, F. 1926b. Unusual forms of fossil crinoids. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 67(9):137 p.Google Scholar
Steininger, J. 1849. Die Versteinerungen des Uebergangs-Gebirges der Eifel. Jahresbericht über den Schul-Cursus 1848/49 an dem Gymnasium zu Trier, p. 1–50.Google Scholar
Steininger, J. 1853. Geognostische Beschreibung der Eifel. Trier, Fr. Lints, 143 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strimple, H. L. and McGinnis, M. R. 1970. A new platycrinitid from Gilmore City, Iowa. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 76(1969):263–266.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. and Watkins, W. T. 1969. Carboniferous crinoids of Texas with stratigraphic implications. Palaeontographica Americana, 6(40):139–275.Google Scholar
Termier, G. and Termier, H. 1950. Paléontologie Marocaine II. Invertébres de l'Ere Primaire. 4. Annélides, Arthropodes, Echinodermes, Conularides et Graptolithe. Service Carte Géologique Morocco, Notes et Mémoires, 79(4):279 p.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T58–T216. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, K. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Echinodermata, Pt. T(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder and Lawrence.Google Scholar
Van Sant, J. F. 1964. Crawfordsville crinoids, p. 34–136. In Van Sant, J. F., and Lane, N. G., Crawfordsville (Indiana) crinoid studies: University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata Article 7.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1878. Transition-forms in crinoids and descriptions of 5 new species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 29, p. 224–266.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1880-1886. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Pt. I. The families Ichthyocrinidae and Cyathocrinidae (1880):226–378, (separate repaged p. 1-153); Pt. II. Family Sphaeroidocrinidae, with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinidae, and Actinocrinidae (1881):177-411 (separate repaged, p. 1-237); Pt. III, Sec. 1. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1885):225-364 (separate repaged, p. 1-138); Pt. III, Sec. 2. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1886):64-226 (separate repaged to continue with section 1, p. 139-302).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology Memoirs 20 and 21, 897 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanner, J. 1916. Die Permischen echinodermen von Timor, I. Teil. Palaontologie von Timor, 11, 329 p.Google Scholar
Wanner, J. 1937. Neue beiträge zur kenntnis der Permischen echinodermen von Timor, VIII-XIII. Palaeontographica, Supplement 4, IV Abteilungen, Abschnitt 1, 212 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1987. Permian crinoids from the type-section of the Callytharra Formation, Callytharra Springs, Western Australia. Alcheringa, 11:95–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1993. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1986-1990. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 25, 204 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1997. Lower Carboniferous echinoderms from northern Utah and western Wyoming. Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 128, Paleontology Series 1, 65 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 2003. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, coronates, and hemistreptocrinids 1758-1999. Geological Society of America Special Paper 363, <http://crinoid.gsajournals.org/crinoidmod>..>Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 2006. Pennsylvanian crinoids of New Mexico. New Mexico Geology, 28(1):3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, G. D. and Jell, P. A. 1992. Permian echinoderms from Western Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 32(1):311–373.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. and Jell, P. A. 1999a. New Permian crinoids from eastern Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 43(1):279–340.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. and Jell, P. A. 1999b. New Carboniferous crinoids from Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 43(1):237–277.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. and Lane, N. G. 1987. Crinoids from the Anchor Limestone (Lower Mississippian) of the Monte Cristo Group Southern Nevada. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Paper 119, 55 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D., Maples, C. G., Sevastopulo, G. D., Frest, T. J., and Waters, J. A. 2004. Carboniferous (Viséan-Moscovian) echinoderm faunas from the Béchar Basin area of western Algeria. Bulletin of American Paleontology 368, 98 p.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1898. A bibliographic index of Carboniferous invertebrates. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 153, 653 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S. 1909. Kinderhook faunal studies - V, the fauna of the Fern Glen Formation. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 20:265–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S. 1920. The Geology of Hardin County. Chapter 13, Paleontology. Illinois Geological Survey Bulletin, 41:313–377.Google Scholar
Whidborne, G. F. 1898. A monograph of the Devonian fauna of South West England. Pt. III. The fauna of the Marwood and Pilton Beds of North Devon and Somerset (continued). Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, 48(3):179–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. A. 1862. Description of new species of fossils from the Devonian and Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Boston Society of Natural History Journal, 9:8–33.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1863. Observations on the summit structure of Pentremites, the structure and arrangement of certain parts of crinoids, and descriptions of new species from the Carboniferous rocks of Burlington, Iowa. Boston Society of Natural History Journal, 7:481–506.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1865. Description of new species of fossils from the Devonian and Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Boston Society of Natural History Journal, 9:8–33.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1874. Preliminary report upon invertebrate fossils collected by the expeditions of 1871, 1872, and 1873. Geographical and Geological Exploration and Surveys west of the 100th Meridian, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, 27 p.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1893. Republication of descriptions of Lower Carboniferous Crinoidea from the Hall collection now in the American Museum Natural History with illustrations of the original type specimens not heretofore figured. American Museum of Natural History Memoir, 1(1), 37 p.Google Scholar
Willink, R. J. 1978. Permian crinoids from eastern Australia. Unpublished dissertation, Australian National University, Australia, 381 p.Google Scholar
Wood, E. 1909. A critical summary of Troost's unpublished manuscript on the crinoids of Tennessee. U.S. National Museum Bulletin, 64, 150 p.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1860. Notice of a new species of Platycrinus and other fossils from the Mountain Limestone of Illinois and Iowa. Transactions of the St. Louis Academy of Sciences, 1:569–571.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1937. Scottish Carboniferous crinoids. Geological Magazine, 74:385–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1938. Some British platycrinidae and descriptions of new species. Geological Magazine, 75:266–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1942. New British Carboniferous crinoids. Geological Magazine, 79:269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1950-1960. The British Carboniferous Crinoidea. Palaeontographical Society, Monograph, 1(1):1–24, 1950; 1(2):25-46, 1951a; 1(3):47-102, 1951b; 1(4):103-148, 1952a; 1(5):149-190, 1954a; 2(1):191-254, 1955a; 2(2):255-272, 1955b; 2(3):273-306, 1956b; 2(4):307-328, 1958; 2(5):329-347, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakovlev, . 1956. In Yakovlev, N. N., and Ivanov, A. P., Morskie lilii i blastoidei kamennougolnykh i permskikh otlozhenii SSSR [Marine crinoids and blastoids of the Carboniferous and Permian deposits of Russia]. Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskii Geologicheskogo Institut Trudy, 11, 142 p.Google Scholar
Zeiler, F. and Wirtgen, P. W. 1885. Bemerkungen über die Petreefacten der älteren devonischen Gebirge am Rheine, insbesondere über die Echinodermen in der Umgegend von Coblenz und in dem Eifeler Kalke vorkommenden Arten. Verhandlungen des Naturhistorisch Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlands und Westfalen, 12:79–85.Google Scholar