Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T06:20:22.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dimorphism in Kheraiceras Spath from the Callovian Chari Formation, Kutch, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

S. Bardhan
Affiliation:
1Department of Geological Sciences, Jadavpur University, Calcutta-700032, India
K. Datta
Affiliation:
2Geology Section, Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Ankleshwar 393010, India
S. K. Jana
Affiliation:
1Department of Geological Sciences, Jadavpur University, Calcutta-700032, India
D. Pramanik
Affiliation:
1Department of Geological Sciences, Jadavpur University, Calcutta-700032, India

Abstract

Kheraiceras Spath, 1924, is known mainly from macroconchs. Matching of dimorphic pairs at species level is difficult due to the rarity of microconchs and consequent difficulty in establishing contemporaneity. The present study reveals dimorphism within Kheraiceras cosmopolitum (Parona and Bonarelli, 1895) from the lower part of the Callovian Chari Formation, Kutch, India, where microconch closely resembles macroconch except for the size, being about three times smaller and having an aperture characterized by terminal construction. The evolution of Kheralceras from Bullatimorphites Buckman is based on macroconchs only. The discovery of coeval microconch specimens and study of known microconchs within the lineage indicate “parallel” evolution in macro- and microconchs and improves the understanding of evolutionary trends that involve complex heterochronic processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkell, W. J. 1952-1954. Monograph of the English Bathonian ammonites. Palaeontographical Society London, 106–107 (3–4):73128.Google Scholar
Bardhan, S., and Datta, K. 1987. Description and stratigraphic distribution of Kheraiceras Spath, 1924 in Kutch, India. Mesozoic Research, 1:147150.Google Scholar
Bardhan, S., Datta, K., Khan, D., and Bhaumik, D. 1988. Tulitidae genus Bullatimorphites from Upper Bathonian Patcham Formation, Kutch, India. Newsletter on Stratigraphy, 20:2127.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. K. 1977. Mesozoic rock-stratigraphy of Kutch, Gujarat. Quarterly Journal of the Geological, Mineralogical and Metallurgical Society of India, 49:151.Google Scholar
Buckman, S. S. 1909-1930. Type Ammonites. Volumes 1–7, Wheldon and Wesley, London, 790 p.Google Scholar
Callomon, J. H. 1981. Dimorphism in ammonoids, p. 257273. In House, M. K. and Senior, J. R. (eds.), The Ammonoidea. Systematic Association Special Volume, 18, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
Cariou, E. 1984. Biostratigraphic subdivisions of the Callovian Stage in the Subtethyan province of ammonites, correlations with the Subboreal zonal scale, p. 315326. In Michelsen, O. and Zeiss, A. (eds.), International Symposium on Jurassic Stratigraphy, Erlangen, Volume 1. International Subcommission on Jurassic Stratigraphy (I.U.G.S.).Google Scholar
Cariou, E., and Krishna, J. 1988. The Tethyan Reineckeiinae of Kachchh and Jaisalmer (West India): systematic, biostratigraphic and biogeographic implications. Palaeontographica, 203:149170.Google Scholar
Datta, K. 1992. Facies, fauna and sequence: an integrated approach in the Jurassic Patcham and Chari Formations, Kutch, India. Unpubl. , , 167 p.Google Scholar
Donovan, D. T., Callomon, J. H., and Howarth, M. K. 1981. Classification of the Jurassic ammonities, p. 101155. In House, M. K. and Senior, J. R. (eds.), The Ammonoidea. Systematics Association Special Volume, 18, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
Enay, R. 1959. Note sur quelques Tulitidés (Ammonitina) du Bathonien. Bulletin De La Sociéte Geologique de France, 1:252259.Google Scholar
Kanjilal, S. 1978. A new species of Kheraiceras Spath (Ammonoidea) from the Lower Callovian of Habo Hill, Kutch. Journal of Paleontology, 52:495496.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1976. Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography, and biostratigraphy. Special Paper in Palaeontology, 17:194.Google Scholar
Krishna, J. 1984. Current status of the Jurassic stratigraphy of Kachchh, western India. International Symposium on Jurassic Stratigraphy, Erlangen, 3:731742.Google Scholar
Krishna, J., and Westermann, G. E. G. 1985. Progress report on the Middle Jurassic ammonite zones of Kachchh, West India. Newsletter on Stratigraphy, 14:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, J., and Westermann, G. E. G. 1987. Faunal associations of the Middle Jurassic ammonite genus Macrocephalites in Kachchh, western India. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 24:15701582.Google Scholar
Krishna, J., Cariou, E., and Enay, R. 1987. Succession of Macrocephalitinae assemblages as revealed at Keera dome in Kachchh, western India, p. 6877. In 2nd International Symposium on Jurassic Stratigraphy, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Lissajous, M. 1923. Étude sur la Faune du Bathonien des Environs de Macon. Travaux Dex Laboratoires De La Faculte des Sciences, Lyon, 3, 273 p.Google Scholar
Mangold, C. 1984. Report of the Bathonian Working Group, p. 6776. In Michelsen, O. and Zeiss, A. (eds.), International Symposium on Jurassic Stratigraphy, Erlangen, Volume 1. International Subcommission on Jurassic Stratigraphy (I.U.G.S.).Google Scholar
Mitra, K. C., Bardhan, S., and Bhattacharya, D. 1979. A study of Mesozoic stratigraphy of Kutch, Gujarat with a special reference to rock-stratigraphy and biostratigraphy of Keera Dome. Bulletin of Indian Geologists’ Association, 12:129143.Google Scholar
Nath, R. 1932. A contribution to the stratigraphy of Cutch. Quarterly Journal of the Geological, Mineralogical and Metallurgical Society of India, 4:161174.Google Scholar
Noetling, F. 1896. Fauna of the Kellaways of Mazar Drik. Palaeontologia Indica, Series 16, 1:122.Google Scholar
Pandey, D. K., and Westermann, G. E. G. 1988. First record of Bathonian Bullatimorphites (Jurassic, Ammonitina) from Kachchh, India. Journal of Paleontology, 62:148150.Google Scholar
Parona, C. F. 1897. Fossili Albiani d'Escragnolles del Nizzardo e della Liguria occidentale. Palaeontographica Italiana, 2:53112.Google Scholar
Parona, C. F., and Bonarelli, G. 1895. Sur la fauna du Callovien inférieur (Chanasien) de Savoie. Mémoir, Académie des Sciences, Chambery, 6:183.Google Scholar
Sandoval, J. 1983. Bioestratigrafia y Paleontología del Bajocense y Bathonense en las Cordilleras Beticas. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain, 613 p.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1924. On the Blake collection of ammonites from Kachh, India. Palaeontologia Indica, New Series 9, Memoir 1, 29 p.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1925. Jurassic Cephalopoda from Madagascar. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 2:130.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1927–1933. Revision of Jurassic cephalopod fauna of Kachh (Cutch). Palaeontologia Indica, New Series, 9, Memoir 2 (1–6):1945.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. 1875. Jurassic fauna of Kutch, the Cephalopoda. Palaeontologia Indica, Series 9, Memoir 1:1247.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1958. Ammoniten-Fauna and Stratigraphie des Bathonian NW-Deutschlands. Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch, 32:1103.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1990. New developments in ecology of Jurassic-Cretaceous ammonoids, p. 459478. In Atti del secrendo convegno internazionale Fossili, Evoluzione, Ambiente, Pergola.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G., and Riccardi, A. C. 1979. Middle Jurassic ammonoid fauna and biochronology of the Argentine-Chilean Andes, Part II: Bajocian Stephanocerataceae. Palaeontographica (A), 164:85188.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G., and Callomon, J. H. 1988. The Macrocephalitinae and associated Bathonian and Early Callovian (Jurassic) ammonoids of the Sula Islands and New Guinea. Palaeontographica, 203:190.Google Scholar