Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:56:24.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Different modes of migration among Late Cretaceous ammonoids in northwestern Hokkaido, Japan: evidence from the analyses of shell whorls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Yasufumi Ikeda  and
Ryoji Wani
Yasufumi Ikeda
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan
Ryoji Wani
Affiliation:
Faculty of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The thickness ratios of shell whorls (=whorl breadth/shell diameter) in the ammonoids Damesites sugata (Forbes, 1845), Hypophylloceras subramosum (Shimizu, 1934), and Gaudryceras tenuiliratum Yabe, 1903 from Late Cretaceous outer shelf deposits in the Kotanbetsu area of northwestern Hokkaido, Japan, were examined in order to determine their mode of migration. The thickness ratios of D. sugata differ significantly with depth on the outer shelf environment but show no significant difference laterally at a similar depth. These results suggest that D. sugata did not frequently migrate to different depths on the outer shelf environment but tended to live and migrate laterally at a similar depth on the outer shelf. The thickness ratios of H. subramosum and G. tenuiliratum show no significant difference between different depths on the outer shelf environment or for lateral direction at a similar depth. This suggests that H. subramosum and G. tenuiliratum frequently migrated at different depths on the outer shelf environment and laterally at a similar depth. There is no difference in hatchling diameters in all the examined species at different depths on the outer shelf environment, suggesting that the thickness ratios became manifest after the post-hatchling stage due to limited migration, which would have been in a nektobenthic habitat. The various modes of migration in the study area are reconstructed in this study, suggesting diversified paleoecology of Late Cretaceous ammonoids.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 86 , Issue 4 , July 2012 , pp. 605 - 615
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayer, U. and McGhee, G. R. Jr. 1984. Iterative evolution of Middle Jurassic ammonite faunas. Lethaia, 17:1–16.Google Scholar
Boston, W. B. and Mapes, R. H. 1991. Ectocochleate cephalopod taphonomy, p. 220–240. InDonovan, S. K.(ed.), The Processes of Fossilization, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Carlson, B. A., McKibben, J. N., and DeGruy, M. V. 1984. Telemetric investigation of vertical migration of Nautilus belauensis in Palau (Western Caroline Islands, Pacific Ocean). Pacific Science, 38:183–188.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr., Ward, P. D., and Weaver, J. S. 1981. Post-mortem ascent of Nautilus shells: implications for cephalopod paleobiogeography. Paleobiology, 7:494–509.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1951. Scaphitoid cephalopods of the Colorado Group. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 239, 39 p.Google Scholar
Doguzhaeva, L. and Mutvei, H. 1989. Ptychoceras—a heteromorphic lytoceratid with truncated shell and modified ultrastructure (Mollusca: Ammonoidea). Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 208:91–121.Google Scholar
Druschits, V. V., Doguzhaeva, L. A., and Mikhailova, I. A. 1977. The structure of the ammonitella and the direct development of ammonites. Paleontological Journal, 11:188–199.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1846. Report on the fossil Invertebrata from Southern India, collected by Mr. Kaye and Mr. Cunliffe. Transactions of the Geological Society of London, Second Series, 7:97–174.Google Scholar
Hoshi, H. and Takashima, R. 1999. Paleomagnetic analysis for some volcanic rocks of the Sorachi Group in the Furano area, central Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of the Mikasa City Museum, Natural Science, 3:23–30. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1987. Geographic distribution of Nautilus, p. 53–64. InSaunders, W. B. and Landman, N. H.(eds.), Nautilus. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K. 1992. Shape, drag, and power in ammonoid swimming. Paleobiology, 18:203–220.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K. and Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1996. Buoyancy and hydrodynamics in ammonoids, p. 169–224. InLandman, N. H.Tanabe, K., and Davis, R. A.(eds.), Ammonoid Paleobiology. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K., Landman, N. H., and Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1994. Ammonite shell shape covaries with facies and hydrodynamics: iterative evolution as a response to changes in basinal environment. Geology, 22:905–908.Google Scholar
Kawabe, F. 2003. Relationship between mid-Cretaceous (upper Albian–Cenomanian) ammonoid facies and lithofacies in the Yezo forearc basin, Hokkaido, Japan. Cretaceous Research, 24:751–763.Google Scholar
Kawada, M. 1929. On some new species of ammonites from the Naibuchi district, South Saghalien. Journal of Geological Society of Japan, 36:1–11. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
Klofak, S., Landman, N. H., and Mapes, R. H. 2007. Patterns of embryonic development in Early to Middle Devonian ammonoids, p. 15–56. InLandman, N. H., Davis, R. A., and Mapes, R. H.(eds.), Cephalopods, Present and Past: New Insights and Fresh Perspectives. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Klug, C. 2001. Life-cycle of some Devonian ammonoids. Lethaia, 34:215–233.Google Scholar
Klug, C. and Korn, D. 2004. The origin of ammonoid locomotion. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 49:235–242.Google Scholar
Kruta, I., Landman, N. H., Rouget, I., Cacca, F., and Tafforeau, P. 2011. The role of ammonites in the Mesozoic marine food web revealed by jaw preservation. Science, 331:70–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulicki, C. 1974. Remarks on the embryogeny and postembryonal development of ammonites. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 19:201–224.Google Scholar
Kulicki, C. 1979. The ammonite shell: its structure, development and biological significance. Palaeontologica Polonica, 39:97–142.Google Scholar
Kulicki, C. 1996. Ammonoid shell microstructure, p. 65–101. InLandman, N. H., Tanabe, K., and Davis, R. A.(eds.), Ammonoid Paleobiology. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Landman, N. H. 1985. Preserved ammonitellas of Scaphites (Ammonidea, Ancyloceratina). American Museum Novitates, 2815:1–10.Google Scholar
Landman, N. H. and Waage, K. H. 1993. Scaphitid ammonites of the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Fox Hills Formation in South Dakota and Wyoming. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 215:1–257.Google Scholar
Landman, N. H., Tanabe, K., and Shigeta, Y. 1996. Ammonoid embryonic development, p. 343–405. InLandman, N. H., Tanabe, K., and Davis, R. A.(eds.)Ammonoid Paleobiology. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Maeda, H. and Seilacher, A. 1996. Ammonoid taphonomy, p. 543–578. InLandman, N. H., Tanabe, K., and Davis, R. A.(eds.), Ammonoid Paleobiology. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1942. Fundamentals in the Cretaceous stratigraphy of Japan. Pt. I. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 1:129–280.Google Scholar
Moriya, K., Nishi, H., Kawahata, H., Tanabe, K., and Takayanagi, Y. 2003. Demersal habitat of Late Cretaceous ammonoids: evidence from oxygen isotopes for the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) northwestern Pacific thermal structure. Geology, 31:167–170.Google Scholar
Nagao, T. and Matsumoto, T. 1940. A monograph of the Cretaceous Inoceramus of Japan. Pt. II. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido Imperial University, Ser. 4, Geology and Mineralogy, 6:1–64.Google Scholar
Okada, H. 1983. Collision orogenesis and sedimentation in Hokkaido, Japan, p. 91–105. InHashimoto, M. and Uyeda, S.(eds.), Accretion Tectonics in the Circum-Pacific Regions. Terra Scientific Publishing Company, Tokyo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouget, I. and Neige, P. 2001. Embryonic ammonoid shell features: intraspecific variation revised. Palaeontology, 44:53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, W. B. 1981. A new species of Nautilus from Palau. Veliger, 24:8–17.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B. 1984. The role and status of Nautilus in its natural habitat: evidence from deep-water remote camera photosequences. Paleobiology, 10:469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, W. B. and Spinosa, C. 1979. Nautilus movement and distribution in Palau. Paleobiology, 4:349–358.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B. and Ward, P. D. 1987. Ecology, distribution, and population characteristics of Nautilus, p. 137–162. InSaunders, W. B. and Landman, N. H.(eds.), Nautilus. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, S. 1934. Ammonites. InSimizu, S., and Obata, T.(eds.), Cephalopoda. Iwanami's Lecture Series of Geology and Palaeontology, Tokyo, 137 p. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
Tajika, A. and Wani, R. 2011. Intraspecific variation of hatchling size in Late Cretaceous ammonoids from Hokkaido, Japan: implication for planktic duration at early ontogenetic stage. Lethaia, 44:287–298.Google Scholar
Takashima, R., Kawabe, F., Nishi, H., Moriya, K., Wani, R., and Ando, H. 2004. Geology and stratigraphy of forearc basin sediments in Hokkaido, Japan: Cretaceous environmental events on the north-west Pacific margin. Cretaceous Research, 25:365–390.Google Scholar
Tanabe, K. 1979. Palaeoecological analysis of ammonoid assemblages in the Turonian Scaphites facies of Hokkaido, Japan. Palaeontology, 22:609–630.Google Scholar
Tanabe, K. and Ohtsuka, Y. 1985. Ammonoid early internal shell structure: its bearing on early life history. Paleobiology, 11:310–322.Google Scholar
Tanabe, K., Fukuda, Y., and Obata, I. 1980. Ontogenetic development and functional morphology in the early growth stages of three Cretaceous ammonites. Bulletin of National Science Museum, Series C, 6:9–26.Google Scholar
Tanabe, K., Hirano, H., Matsumoto, T., and Miyata, Y. 1977. Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous deposits in the Obira area, northwestern Hokkaido. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 12:181–202. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
Tanabe, K., Kulicki, C., Landman, N. H., and Mapes, R. H. 2001. External shell features of embryonic and early postembryonic shells of a Carboniferous goniatite Vidrioceras from Kansas. Paleontological Research, 5:13–19.Google Scholar
Tanabe, K., Landman, N. H., and Yoshioka, Y. 2003. Intra-and interspecific variation in the early internal shell features of some Cretaceous ammonoids. Journal of Paleontology, 77:876–887.Google Scholar
Tanaka, K. 1963. A study on the Cretaceous sedimentation in Hokkaido, Japan. Report of the Geological Survey of Japan, 197:1–122.Google Scholar
Tanaka, K. and Sumi, Y. 1981. Cretaceous paleocurrents in the central zone of Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan, 32:65–127(In Japanese).Google Scholar
Toshimitsu, S. 1985. Biostratigraphy and depositional facies of the Cretaceous in the upper reaches of the Haboro River, Hokkaido. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, 91:599–618. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
Toshimitsu, S. 1988. Biostratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Santonian Stage in northwestern Hokkaido. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 26:125–192.Google Scholar
Toshimitsu, S., Maiya, S., Inoue, Y., and Takahashi, T. 1998. Integrated megafossil-foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Santonian to lower Campanian (Upper Cretaceous) succession in northwestern Hokkaido, Japan. Cretaceous Research, 19:69–85.Google Scholar
Toshimitsu, S., Matsumoto, T., Noda, M., Nishida, T., and Maiya, S. 1995. Integration of mega-, micro- and magneto-stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous in Japan, p. 357–570. InK-H.Chan, and Park, S-O.(eds.), Environmental and Tectonic History of East and South Asia with Emphasis on Cretaceous Correlation (IGCP 350). Kyungpook National University, Teagu.Google Scholar
Wani, R. 2003. Taphofacies models for Upper Cretaceous ammonoids from the Kotanbetsu area, northwestern Hokkaido, Japan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 199:71–82.Google Scholar
Wani, R. and Hirano, H. 2000. Upper Cretaceous biostratigraphy in the Kotanbetsu area, northwestern Hokkaido. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, 106:171–188. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
Wani, R., Kase, T., Shigeta, Y., and de Ocampo, R. 2005. New look at ammonoid taphonomy, based on field experiments with modern chambered nautilus. Geology, 33:849–852.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D., Carlson, B., Weekley, M., and Brumbaugh, B. 1984. Remote telemetry of daily vertical and horizontal movement by Nautilus in Palau. Nature, 309:248–250.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1996. Ammonoid life and habitat, p. 607–707. InLandman, N. H., Tanabe, K., and Davis, R. A.(eds.), Ammonoid Paleobiology. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Yabe, H. 1903. Cretaceous Cephalopoda from the Hokkaido. Pt. 1. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, 18:1–55.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1885. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie. Druck und verlag von R. Oldenbourg, München, 971 p.Google Scholar