Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:33:12.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A chondrophorine coelenterate from the Borden Formation (Lower Mississippian) of Kentucky

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Ellis L. Yochelson  and
Charles E. Mason
Ellis L. Yochelson
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20560
Charles E. Mason
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Sciences, Morehead State University, Morehead, Kentucky 40351
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A disc-like soft-bodied fossil recovered from the Farmers Member of the Borden Formation in northeastern Kentucky is described and is interpreted as a chondrophorine float, an internal feature. This is apparently the first report of a post-Devonian fossil porpitid.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 60 , Issue 5 , September 1986 , pp. 1025 - 1028
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chaplin, J. 1982. Field guidebook to the paleoenvironments and biostratigraphy of the Borden and parts of the Newman and Breathitt Formations (Mississippian-Pennsylvanian) in northeastern Kentucky. 12th Annual Field Conference, Great Lakes Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 196 p.Google Scholar
Foster, M. W. 1979. Soft-bodied coelenterates in the Pennsylvanian of Illinois, p. 191–267. In Nitecki, M. H. (ed.), Mazon Creek Fossils. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, H. J. and Moore, R. C. 1955. Fossil jellyfishes from Kansas Pennsylvanian rocks and elsewhere. State Geological Survey of Kansas Bulletin, 114(5):153–164.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J. and Moore, R. C. 1956. Medusae incertae sedis and unrecognizable forms, p. F153–F161. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part F, Coelenterata. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Kepfele, R. C. 1977. Stratigraphy, petrology, and depositional environment of the Kenwood Silt-stone Member, Borden Formation (Mississippian), Kentucky and Indiana. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1007, 49 p.Google Scholar
Stanley, G. D. Jr. 1982. Paleozoic chondrophores (medusoid hydrozoans) and their implications for problematical mollusclike fossils. North American Paleontological Convention III, Proceedings, 2:501–504.Google Scholar
Stasińska, A. 1960. Velumbrella czarnockii n. gen., n. sp. Méduse du Cambrien inférieur des monts de Sainte-Croix. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 5:337–348.Google Scholar
Thiel, H. 1966. The evolution of Scyphozoa: a review, p. 77–116. In Rees, W. J. (ed.), The Cnidaria and Their Evolution. Zoological Society of London, Symposium 16. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Van Straelen, V. 1926. Sur les premiers restes de Méduses trouves dans le calcaire carbonifère de Belgique. Bulletin de la Académie Royale Belgique, Classe des Sciences, série 5, 12:952–956.Google Scholar
Werner, B. 1975. Bau und Lebensgeschichte des Polypen von Tripedalia cystophora (Cubozoa, class nov., Carybeidae) und seine Bedeutung für die Evolution der Cnidaria. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 27:461–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar