Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:32:30.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The beaver Anchitheriomys from the Miocene of central Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Clara Stefen
Affiliation:
Staatliche Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Tierkunde, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany,
Thomas Mörs
Affiliation:
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeozoology, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden,

Abstract

New finds of teeth and mandibles of Anchitheriomys from the Hambach opencast lignite mine in Northwest Germany and the first detailed descriptions of other mandibles from South Germany and Switzerland allow a review of the Central European specimens of this rare beaver genus. The metric variation of cheek teeth and especially the great differences in dimensions of incisors can be much better assessed. The observed range in size can be attributed to ontogenetic changes, and all material is assigned to Anchitheriomys suevicus. Stratigraphically, this species is restricted to the early middle Miocene, European Mammalian Neogene biozones MN 5–6.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agryropulo, A. I. 1939. Remains of a beaver (Amblycastor caucasicus sp. n.) from the Pliocene of the Ciscaucasia. Comptes Rendues du Academie des Sciences Moscou, 25:636639.Google Scholar
Bergounioux, F.-M. and Crouzel, F. 1964. Sur quelques Castoridés du bassin d'Aquitaine. Bulletin du Société Géologique de France, 6:253258.Google Scholar
Bolliger, T. 1997. The current knowledge of the biozonation with small mammals in the Upper Freshwater Molasse in Switzerland, especially the Hörnli-fan. Actes du Congrès BiochroM 97. In Aguilar, J.-P., Legendre, S., and Michaux, J. (eds.) Mémoires et Travaux de l'Institut de Montpellier, École Pratique des Hautes Études, 21:501513.Google Scholar
Bruijn, H. De, Daams, R., Daxner-Höck, G., Fahlbusch, V., Ginsburg, L., Mein, P., and Morales, J. 1992. Report of the RCMNS working group on fossil mammals, Reisensburg 1990. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 26:65118.Google Scholar
Bürgisser, H. M., Furrer, H., and Hünermann, K. A. 1983. Stratigraphie und Säugetierfaunen der mittelmiozänen Fossilfundstellen Hüllistein und Martinsbrünneli (Obere Süsswassermolasse, Nordostschweiz. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 76:733762.Google Scholar
Dalsätt, J., Mörs, T., and Ericson, P. G. P. 2006. Fossil birds from the Miocene and Pliocene of Hambach (NW Germany). Palaeontographica A, 277:113121.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. 1999. Bering down: Miocene dispersals of land mammals between North America and Europe, p. 473483. In Rössner, G. E. and Heissig, K. (eds.), The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe. Pfeil, München, 515 p.Google Scholar
Dehm, R. 1957. Fossilführung und Altersbestimmung der Oberen Süßwasser-Molasse auf Blatt Augsburg 1:50,000, p. 3439. In Erläuterungen zur Geologischen Karte von Augsburg und Umgebung 1:50,000. Bayerisches Geologisches Landesamt, München, 92 p.Google Scholar
Engesser, B., Matter, A., and Weidmann, M. 1981. Stratigraphie und Säugetierfaunen des mittleren Miozäns von Vermes (Kt. Jura). Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 74:893952.Google Scholar
Freye, H.-A. 1959. Descriptive Anatomie des Craniums vom Elbe Biber (Castor fiber albicus Matschie 1907). Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universität Halle, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Reihe, 8:913962.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, L. 1990. The faunas and stratigraphical subdivisions of the Orleanian in the Loire Basin (France), p. 157176. In Lindsay, E. H., Fahlbusch, V., and Mein, P. (eds.), European Neogene Mammal Chronology. NATO ASI Series, Plenum Press, New York, 658 p.Google Scholar
Heissig, K. 1989. Neue Ergebnisse zur Stratigraphie der mittleren Serie der Oberen Süßwassermolasse Bayerns. Geologica Bavarica, 94:239257.Google Scholar
Heissig, K. 1997. Mammal faunas intermediate between the reference faunas of MN 4 and MN 6 from the Upper Freshwater Molasse of Bavaria. Actes du Congrès BiochroM 97, 21:537546. In Aguilar, J.-P., Legendre, S., and Michaux, J. (eds.), Mém. Trav. Mémoires et Travaux de l'Institut de Montpellier, École Pratique des Hautes Études.Google Scholar
Heizmann, E. P. J. 1982. Fund einer Anchitheriomys-Mandibel in Goldern (Niederbayern). Documenta Naturae, 4:3032.Google Scholar
Hierholzer, E. and Mörs, T. 2003. Cypriniden-Schlundzähne (Osteichthyes: Teleostei) aus dem Tertiär von Hambach (Niederrheinische Bucht, NW-Deutschland). Palaeontographica, A 269:138.Google Scholar
Hugueney, M. 1999. Family Castoridae, p. 281300. In Rössner, G. E. and Heissig, K. (eds.), The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe. Pfeil, München, 515 p.Google Scholar
Hugueney, M. and Escuillé, F. 1995. K-strategy and adaptive specialization in Steneofiber from Montaigu-le-Blin (dept. Aillier, France; Lower Miocene, MN 2a ± 23 Ma): first evidence of fossil life-history strategies in castorid rodents. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 113:217225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hünermann, K. A. 1981. Die Glimmersandgrube am Rodenberg bei Schlattingen (Kt. Thurgau) als paläontologishes Studienobjekt in der Oberen Süsswassermolasse. Mitteilungen der thurgauischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 44:732.Google Scholar
Joyce, W. G., Klein, N., and Mörs, T. 2004. Carettochelyine turtle from the Neogene of Europe. Copeia, 2004:406411.Google Scholar
Kälin, D. 1993. Stratigraphie und Säugetierfaunen der Oberen Süßwassermolasse der Nordwestschweiz. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation No. 10152, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 238 p.Google Scholar
Klein, N. and Mörs, T. 2003. Die Schildkröten (Reptilia: Testudines) aus dem Mittel-Miozän von Hambach (Niederrheinische Bucht, NW-Deutschland). Palaeontographica A, 268:148.Google Scholar
Koenigswald, W. von and Mörs, T. 2001. The enamel microstructure of Anchitheriomys (Rodentia, Mammalia) in comparison with that of other beavers and of porcupines. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 74:601612.Google Scholar
Köhler, M. 1993. Skeleton and habitat of recent and fossil ruminants. Münchner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen Series A, 25:188.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W. 2001. A new species of Anchitheriomys (Rodentia, Castoridae) and a review of the anchitheriomyine beavers from North America. Paludicola, 3:5155.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W. 2002. Comments on the systematics and classification of the beavers (Rodentia, Castoridae). Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 8(2001):279296.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W. 2004. Beavers (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the Runningwater Formation (Early Miocene, Early Hemingfordian) of western Nebraska. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 73:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W. W. and Emry, R. J. 1997. The skull of Anchitheriomys and a new subfamily of beavers (Castoridae, Rodentia). Journal of Paleontology, 71:343347.Google Scholar
Landry, S. O. 1957. The interrelationships of the New and Old World hystricomorph rodents. University of California Publications in Zoology, 56:1118.Google Scholar
Lopatin, A. V., Tesakov, A. S., and Titov, V. V. 2003. Late Miocene-early Pliocene porcupines (Rodentia, Hystricidae) from south European Russia. Russian Journal of Theriology, 2:2632.Google Scholar
Matthew, W. D. 1918. Contributions to the Snake Creek fauna; with notes upon the Pleistocene of western Nebraska; American Museum Expedition of 1916. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 38:183229.Google Scholar
Mayr, H., Rieber, E., and Spitzelberger, G. 1988. Die Fossilfundstelle Goldern bei Landshut (Untermiozän, Karpat), Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 4:6378.Google Scholar
Mckenna, M. and Bell, S. K. 1997. Classification of mammals above the species level. Columbia University Press, New York, 631 p.Google Scholar
Mörs, T. 2002. Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of continental Tertiary vertebrate faunas in the Lower Rhine Embayment (NW-Germany). Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw, 81:177183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mörs, T. 2006. The platacanthomyine rodent Neocometes Schaub & Zapfe, 1953 from the Miocene of Hambach (NW Germany). Beiträge zur Paläontologie, 30:329337.Google Scholar
Mörs, T., von der Hocht, F., and Wutzler, B. 2000. Die erste Wirbeltierfauna aus der miozänen Braunkohle der Niederrheinischen Bucht (Ville-Schichten, Tagebau Hambach. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 74:145170.Google Scholar
Mörs, T. and Kalthoff, D. C. 2004. A new species of Karydomys (Rodentia, Mammalia) and a systematic re-evaluation of this rare Eurasian Miocene hamster. Palaeontology, 47:13871405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemetschek, A. and Mörs, T. 2003. Myoglis meini (de Bruijn, 1965 [1966]) (Mammalia: Gliridae) aus dem Miozän von Hambach 6C (NW-Deutschland). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 77:401416.Google Scholar
Qiu, Z. 1990. The Chinese Neogene mammalian biochronology—its correlation with the European Neogene mammalian zonation, p. 527556. In Lindsay, E. H., Fahlbusch, V., and Mein, P. (eds.), European Neogene Mammal Chronology. NATO ASI Series, Plenum Press, New York, 658 p.Google Scholar
Qiu, Z. 1996. Middle Miocene micromammalian fauna from Tunggur, Nei Mongol. Science, Beijing, 216 p.Google Scholar
Qiu, Z. and Li, C. 2003. Rodents from the Chinese Neogene: Biogeographic relationships with Europe and North America. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 279:586602.Google Scholar
Qiu, Z., Wu, W. and Qiu, Z. 1999. Miocene mammal faunal sequences of China: Palaeozoogeography and Eurasian relationships, p. 443455. In Rössner, G. E. and Heissig, K. (eds.), The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe. Pfeil, München, 515 p.Google Scholar
Rinnert, P. 1956. Die Huftiere aus dem Braunkohlenmiozän der Oberpfalz. Palaeontographica A, 107:165.Google Scholar
Roger, O. 1885. Kleine paläntologische Mittheilungen. I. Zwei Problematica. II. Säugethierreste aus der Reischenau. (Zusamthal in Schwaben). III. Das Dinotherium von Breitenbronn. Bericht des Naturhistorischen Vereins für Schwaben und Neuburg, 28:93118.Google Scholar
Roger, O. 1898. Wirbeltierreste aus dem Dinotheriensande der bayerischschwäbischen Hochebene. Bericht des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schwaben und Neuburg, 33:146.Google Scholar
Roger, O. 1904. Wirbeltierreste aus dem Obermiocän der bayerisch-schwäbischen Hochebene. V. Teil. Bericht des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schwaben und Neuburg, 36:121.Google Scholar
Rössner, G. E. and Mörs, T. 2001. A new record of the enigmatic Eurasian Miocene ruminant artiodactyl Orygotherium . Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 21:591595.Google Scholar
Savage, D. E. and Russell, D. E. 1983. Mammalian Paleofaunas of the World. Addison-Wesley, London, 432.Google Scholar
Schäfer, A., Utescher, T., and Mörs, T. 2004. Stratigraphy of the Cenozoic Lower Rhine Basin, northwestern Germany. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 40:73110.Google Scholar
Schlosser, M. 1884. Die Nager des europäischen Tertiärs nebst Betrachtungen über die Organisation und die geschichtliche Entwicklung der Nager überhaupt. Palaeontographica, 31:19162.Google Scholar
Schlosser, M. 1902. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Säugetierreste aus den Süddeutschen Bohnerzen. Geologische und Paläontologische Abhandlungen Jena, Neue Folge, 5:117258.Google Scholar
Schreuder, A. 1951. The three species of Trogontherium, with a remark on Anchitheriomys . Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie Leiden, 8:400433.Google Scholar
Seemann, I. 1938. Die Insektenfresser, Fledermäuse und Nager aus der obermiocänen Braunkohle von Viehhausen bei Regensburg. Palaeontographica A, 89:156.Google Scholar
Stefen, C. 1997. Steneofiber eseri (Castoridae, Mammalia) von der Westtangente bei Ulm im Vergleich zu anderen Biberpopulationen. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, 255:178.Google Scholar
Stefen, C. 2001. The Barstovian (Miocene) beavers from Stewart Valley, Nevada, and a preliminary discussion of the genus Monosaulax mainly on the basis of tooth morphology. PaleoBios, 21:115.Google Scholar
Stehlin, H. G. and Schaub, S. 1950. Die Trigonodontie der simplizidentaten Nager. Schweizerische Palaeontologische Abhandlungen, 67:5385.Google Scholar
Stirton, R. A. 1934. A new species of Amblycastor from the Platybelodon beds, Tung Gur Formation, of Mongolia. American Museum Novitates, 694:14.Google Scholar
Stirton, R. A. 1935. A review of tertiary beavers. University of California Publications, Geological Science, 23:391458.Google Scholar
Tedford, R. H., Albright, L. B., Barnosky, A. D., Ferrusquia-Villafranca, I., Hunt, R. M., Storer, J. E., Swisher, C. C., Voorhies, M. R., Webb, S. D., and Whistler, D. P. 2004. Mammalian biochronology of the Arikareean through Hemphillian interval (Late Oligocene through Early Pliocene epochs). p. 169231. In Woodburne, M. O. (ed.), Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America. Columbia University Press, New York, 391 p.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Qiu, Z., and Opdyke, N. D. 2003. Litho-, bio-, and magnetostratigraphy and paleoenvironment of Tunggur Formation (Middle Miocene) in Central Inner Mongolia, China. American Museum Novitates, 3411:131.Google Scholar
Weers, D. J. van. 1993. Teeth morphology and taxonomy of the Miocene rodent Anchitheriomys suevicus (Schlosser, 1884), with notes on the family Hystricidae. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 96:8189.Google Scholar
Wood, H. E. 1945. Late Miocene beaver from southeastern Montana. American Museum Novitates, 1299:16.Google Scholar
Woodburne, M. O. 2004. Global events and the North American mammalian biochronology. p. 315343. In Woodburne, M. O. (ed.), Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America. Columbia University Press, New York, 391 p.Google Scholar
Ziegler, R. and Mörs, T. 2000. Marsupialia, Lipotyphla und Chiroptera (Mammalia) aus dem Miozän des Braunkohlentagebaus Hambach (Niederrheinische Bucht, NW-Deutschland). Palaeontographica A, 257:126.Google Scholar