Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:18:35.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An illustrated key to the identification of unilocular genera of calcareous foraminifera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Fred E. Clark  and
R. Timothy Patterson
Fred E. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3
R. Timothy Patterson
Affiliation:
Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Center and Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Taxonomic keys are rarely used as an aid to the identification of foraminifera. Such keys become increasingly attractive, however, as the number of taxa which must be distinguished becomes large. The proliferation of known genera over the last 25 years is nowhere more apparent than in the unilocular calcareous foraminifera, where the number of genera has risen from 5 to 46. We present herein a dichotomous key in which any species may be assigned to its proper genus by progressing through a series of steps, consisting of paired statements, in which only one choice is made at a time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 20 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balkwill, F. P., and Millett, F. W. 1884. The foraminifera of Galway; Part 2. Journal of Microscopy and Natural Science, 3:78–90.Google Scholar
Barrick, R., Beverage, A., Patterson, R. T., and Schubert, J. 1989. Tortaguttus, a new foraminiferal genus. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 22:65–67.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1964. Micropaleontologia del Paleoceno de General Roca (Provincia de Rio Negro). Revista del Museo La Plata (n.s.), Paleontologia, 4:125–184.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E., and Giussani de Kahn, G. M. 1983. Evaluation of benthic monothalamous foraminiferas as guide fossils in Cenozoic deep-sea deposits of the South Atlantic. Micropaleontology, 29:298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borror, D. J., De Long, D. M., and Triplehorn, C. A. 1981. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, 928 p.Google Scholar
Britton, E. B. 1986. A revision of the Australian chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae). Vol. 4. Tribe Liparetrini: genus Colpochila. Australian Journal of Zoology, Supplementary Series No. 118:1–135.Google Scholar
Buchner, P. 1940. Die Lagenen des Golfes von Neapel und der marinen ablagerungen auf Ischia (Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Insel Ischia 1). Nova Acta Leopoldina, new series, 9:364–560.Google Scholar
Clark, F. E. 1990. Holocene benthic foraminifera from the tropical southwest Pacific Ocean. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, 479 p.Google Scholar
Colom, G. 1956. Los foraminíferos del Burdigaliense de Mallorca. Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciencias y Artes de Barcelona, 32:7–140.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A. 1913. A monograph of the Foraminifera of the North Pacific Ocean; Part 3, Lagenidae. Smithsonian Institution, U.S. National Museum Bulletin 71, 125 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A. 1933. An illustrated key to the genera of the foraminifera. Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research Special Publication 5, 107 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A. 1948. Foraminifera, Their Classification and Economic Use. Fourth Edition, Revised and Enlarged, With An Illustrated Key to The Genera. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 605 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A., and Gray, H. B. 1946. A foraminiferal fauna from the Pliocene of Timms Point, California. Cushman Laboratory For Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication, 19, 46 p.Google Scholar
Earland, A. 1934. Foraminifera; Part 3—The Falklands sector of the Antarctic (excluding South Georgia). Discovery Reports, 10:1–208.Google Scholar
Heron-Allen, E., and Earland, A. 1913. Clare Island Survey; Part 64—Foraminifera. Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, 31(1911–1915):1–188.Google Scholar
Jones, F. W. O. R. 1874. On some Recent forms of Lageninae from deep-sea soundings in the Java Seas. Linnean Society of London Transactions, 30:45–69.Google Scholar
Jones, R. W. 1984. A revised classification of the unilocular Nodosariida and Buliminida (Foraminifera). Revista Española de Micropaleontologiá, 16:91–160.Google Scholar
Kanmacher, F. 1798. Adam's Essays on the Microscope, 2nd edition. Dillon and Keaton, London, England, 712 p.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, Th. 1856. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des Coléoptères ou exposé méthodique et critique de tous les genres proposés jusqu'ici dans cet ordre d'insectes. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Rue Hautefeuille, 12, Paris, 3,591 p.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr., and Tappan, H. 1964. Sarcodina, chiefly “Thecamoebians” and Foraminiferida, p. 1–900. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. C, Protista 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., and Tappan, H. 1987. Foraminiferal Genera and Their Classification. Van Nostrand, Reinhold Co., New York (2 vols.), 2,047 p.Google Scholar
Malumián, N., Náñez, C., and Caramés, A. 1991. Unilocular foraminifera of reticular surface, Argentina. Micropaleontology, 37:393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, I. 1977. Qualitative Observations on Recent Foraminiferal Tests with Emphasis on the Eastern Pacific. University of Southern California Press, Los Angeles, California, 1,079 p.Google Scholar
Moncharmont Zei, M., and Sgarrella, F. 1978. Pytine parthenopeia n. gen. et n. sp. (Nodosariidae, Foraminiferida) del Golfo di Napoli. Bollettino della Società dei Naturalisti in Napoli, 87:1–12.Google Scholar
Moncharmont Zei, M., and Sgarrella, F. 1980. Sipholagena benevestita nuovo nome per Buchneria benevestita (Buchner). Bollettino della Società dei Naturalisti in Napoli, 89:1.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d'. 1826. Tableau méthodique de la classe des Céphalopodes. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, sér. 1, 7:245–314.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d'. 1839. Voyage dans l'Amérique meridionale—Foraminifères, Vol. 5, Pt. 5. P. Bertrand, Paris and Strasbourg, 86 p.Google Scholar
Parker, W. K., and Jones, T. R. 1865. On some Foraminifera from the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans, including Davis Straits and Baffin's Bay. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 155:325–441.Google Scholar
Parr, W. 1947. The lagenid foraminifera and their relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, new series, 58:116–130.Google Scholar
Parr, W. 1950. Foraminifera—B.A.N.Z. Antarctic research expedition 1929–1931. Reports, Series B (Zoology and Botany) 5, Part 6:233–392.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. T. 1986a. Late Oligocene to Pleistocene benthic foraminifera from DSDP Site 357 (Leg 39) on the Rio Grande Rise in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Unpubl. , University of California, Los Angeles, 404 p.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. T. 1986b. Globofissurella and Cerebrina, two new foraminiferal genera in the Lagenidae. Journal of Micropalaeontology, 5:65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, R. T. 1988. Globulospinella, a new unilocular foraminiferal genus, and designation of a neotype for Palliolatella avita Patterson and Richardson. Journal of Paleontology, 62:529–531.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. T. 1990. Nanosylvanella, a new genus of the Sipholageninae (Foraminiferida). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 109:325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, R. T., and Pettis, R. H. 1986. Galwayella, a new foraminiferal genus and new names for two foraminiferal homonyms. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 16:74–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, R. T., and Richardson, R. H. 1987. A taxonomic revision of the unilocular foraminifera. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 17:212–226.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. T., and Richardson, R. H. 1988. Eight new genera of unilocular foraminifera. Transactions of American Microscopical Society, 107:240–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popescu, Gh. 1983. Marine Middle Miocene monothalamous foraminifera from Romania. Memorii Institutul de Geologie si Geofizică, Bucharest, 31:261–280.Google Scholar
Puri, H. S. 1954. Contributions to the study of the Miocene of the Florida panhandle. Bulletin Florida State Geological Survey, 36:1–345.Google Scholar
Reuss, A. E. 1850. Neues Foraminiferen aus den Schichten des Österreichischen Tertiärbeckens. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Wien, 1:365–390.Google Scholar
Reuss, A. E. 1851. Die Foraminiferen und Entomostraceen des Kreidemergels von Lemberg. Naturwissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Wien, 4:17–52.Google Scholar
Saidova, Kh. M. 1975. Bentosnye foraminifery Tikhogo Okeana [Benthonic Foraminifera of the Pacific Ocean], Chast' I:1–290; Chast' II:291–586; Chast' III:587–875. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Institut Okeanologii im. P. P. Shirshova, Moscow.Google Scholar
Schnitker, D. 1970. Upper Miocene foraminifera from near Grimesland, Pitt County, North Carolina. North Carolina Department of conservation and Development, Division of Mineral Resources, Special Publication 3:1–138.Google Scholar
Seguenza, G. 1862. Dei terreni terziarii del distretto di Messina; Parte II—Descrizione dei foraminiferi monotalamici delle marne mioceniche del distretto di Messina. T. Capra, Messina, 84 p.Google Scholar
Silvestri, A. 1904. Forma nuove o poco conosciute di Protozoi Miocenici piemontesi. Atti dell'Accademia della Scienze, Torino (1903–1904), 39:4–15.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. 1848. On the Recent British species of the genus Lagena . Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 2, 1:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar