Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T14:32:11.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New marsupial from the early Eocene of Virginia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Kenneth D. Rose
Kenneth D. Rose*
Affiliation:
Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new species of the marsupial Peradectes is described from the early Eocene Nanjemoy Formation of Virginia. It is the first Tertiary marsupial known from the Atlantic Coastal Plain north of Florida. The smallest species of Peradectes, it is more closely related to species known from the Western Interior of North America than to contemporaneous European species.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 84 , Issue 3 , May 2010 , pp. 561 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © 2010, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beard, K. C. and Dawson, M. R. 2001. Early Wasatchian mammals from the Gulf Coastal Plain of Mississippi: Biostratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications, p. 75–94. In Gunnell, G. F. (ed.), Eocene Biodiversity. Unusual Occurrences and Rarely Sampled Habitats. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, K. C. and Dawson, M. R. 2009. Early Wasatchian mammals of the Red Hot Local Fauna, uppermost Tuscahoma Formation, Lauderdale County, Mississippi. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 78: 193–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, T. M. 1979. Geology and mammalian paleontology of the Sand Creek Facies, lower Willwood Formation (Lower Eocene), Washakie County, Wyoming. Geological Survey of Wyoming, Memoir 2: 1–151.Google Scholar
Bown, T. M. and Rose, K. D. 1979. Mimoperadectes, a new marsupial, and Worlandia, a new dermopteran, from the lower part of the Willwood Formation (early Eocene), Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, 25: 89–104.Google Scholar
Case, J. A., Goin, F. J., and Woodburne, M. O. 2005. “South America” marsupials from the Late Cretaceous of North America and the origin of marsupial cohorts. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 12: 461–494.Google Scholar
Clemens, W. A. Jr. 1966. Fossil mammals of the type Lance Formation, Wyoming. Part II. Marsupialia. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 62: 1–122.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1873. Synopsis of new Vertebrata from the Tertiary of Colorado, obtained during the summer of 1873. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1–19.Google Scholar
Crochet, J.-Y. 1978. Les marsupiaux du Tertiaire d'Europe. Thèse, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Académie de Montpellier, France. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Crochet, J.-Y. 1979. Diversité systématique des Didelphidae (Marsupialia) européens tertiaires. Géobios, 12 (3): 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, J. F. 1989. Mammals of the Neotropics. The Northern Neotropics. Volume 1. Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 449 pp.Google Scholar
Evans, H. E. and Christensen, G. C. 1979. Miller's Anatomy of the Dog. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1181 pp.Google Scholar
Gazin, C. L. 1952. The Lower Eocene Knight Formation of western Wyoming and its mammalian faunas. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 117 (18): 1–82.Google Scholar
Gazin, C. L. 1956. Paleocene mammalian faunas of the Bison Basin in south-central Wyoming. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 131 (6): 1–57.Google Scholar
Gill, T. 1872. Arrangement of the families of mammals with analytical tables. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 11 (230): 1–98.Google Scholar
Gunnell, G. F. 1998. Mammalian fauna from the lower Bridger Formation (Bridger A, early middle Eocene) of the southern Green River Basin, Wyoming. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, 30: 83–130.Google Scholar
Horovitz, I., Martin, T., Bloch, J., Ladevèze, S., Kurz, C., and Sánchez-Villagra, M. R. 2009. Cranial anatomy of the earliest marsupials and the origin of opossums. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8278. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008278CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illiger, C. 1811. Prodromus systematis mammalium et avium additis terminis zoographicis utriusque classis. C. Salfeld, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenigswald, W. von. 1970. Peratherium (Marsupialia) in Ober-Oligozän und Miozän von Europa. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse Abhandlungen, neue Folge, Heft 144: 1–79.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W. 1994. Middle Tertiary marsupials (Mammalia) from North America. Journal of Paleontology, 68: 376–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W. W. 2008. Marsupialia, p. 39–47. In Janis, C. M., Gunnell, G. F., and Uhen, M. D., Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America. Volume 2: Small Mammals, Xenarthrans, and Marine Mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishtalka, L. and Stucky, R. K. 1983a. Revision of the Wind River faunas, early Eocene of central Wyoming. Part 3. Marsupialia. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 52: 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishtalka, L. and Stucky, R. K. 1983b. Paleocene and Eocene marsupials of North America. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 52: 229–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishtalka, L. and Stucky, R. K. 1984. Middle Eocene marsupials (Mammalia) from northeastern Utah and the mammalian fauna from Powder Wash. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 53: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillegraven, J. A. 1969. Latest Cretaceous mammals of upper part of Edmonton Formation of Alberta, Canada, and review of marsupialplacental dichotomy in mammalian evolution. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 50: 1–122.Google Scholar
Lillegraven, J. A. 1976. Didelphids (Marsupialia) and Uintasorex (?Primates) from later Eocene sediments of San Diego County, California. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 18: 85–112.Google Scholar
Matthew, W. D. and Granger, W. 1921. New genera of Paleocene mammals. American Museum Novitates, 13: 1–7.Google Scholar
McGrew, P. O. 1937. New marsupials from the Tertiary of Nebraska. Journal of Geology, 45: 448–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, M. C. 1960. Fossil Mammalia from the early Wasatchian Four Mile Fauna, Eocene of northwest Colorado. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 37: 1–130.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. C. and Bell, S. K. 1997. Classification of Mammals above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
de Muizon, C. 1992. La fauna de mamíferos de Tiupampa (Paleoceno inferior, Formación Santa Lucia), Bolivia, p. 575–624. In Suarez-Soruco, R. (ed.), Fosiles y Facies de Bolivia - Vol. I. Vertebrados. Revista Técnica de YBFB, 12, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.Google Scholar
Redford, K. H. and Eisenberg, J. F. 1992. Mammals of the Neotropics. The Southern Cone. Volume 2. Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 430 pp.Google Scholar
Rose, K. D. 1999. Part 7. Fossil mammals from the early Eocene Fisher/Sullivan site, p. 133–138. In Weems, R. E. and Grimsley, G. J. (eds.), Early Eocene vertebrates and plants from the Fisher/Sullivan site (Nanjemoy Formation) Stafford County, Virginia. Virginia Division of Mineral Resources, publication 152, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
Rothecker, J. and Storer, J. E. 1996. The marsupials of the Lac Pelletier lower fauna, middle Eocene (Duchesnean) of Saskatchewan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16: 770–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-villagra, M., Ladeveze, S., Horovitz, I., Argot, C., Hooker, J. J., Macrini, T. E., Martin, T., Moore-Fay, S., De Muizon, C., Schmelzle, T., and Asher, R. J. 2007. Exceptionally preserved North American Paleogene metatherians: Adaptations and discovery of a major gap in the opossum fossil record. Biology Letters, 3: 318–322. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0090)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigé, B. 1971. Les Didelphoidea de Laguna Umayo (Formation Vilquechico, Crétacé supérieur, Pérou), et le peuplement marsupial d'Amérique de Sud. Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris, 273: 2479–2481.Google Scholar
Sigé, B., Sempere, T., Butler, R. F., Marshall, L. G., and Crochet, J.-Y. 2004. Age and stratigraphic reassessment of the fossilbearing Laguna Umayo red mudstone unit, SE Peru, from regional stratigraphy, fossil record, and paleomagnetism. Géobios, 37: 771–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, M. and Downing, J. A. 1995. CRC Handbook of Mammalian Body Masses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 359 pp.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1928. American Eocene didelphids. American Museum Novitates, 307: 1–7.Google Scholar
Stock, C. 1936. Sespe Eocene didelphids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 22: 122–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szalay, F. S. 1982. A new appraisal of marsupial phylogeny and classification, p. 621–640. In Archer, M. (ed.), Carnivorous Marsupials. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
Teilhard de Chardin, P. 1927. Les mammifères de l'Éocène inférieur de la Belgique. Mémoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 36: 1–33.Google Scholar
Weems, R. E. and Grimsley, G. J. 1999. Part 1. Introduction, geology, and paleogeographic setting, p. 1–10. In Weems, R. E. and Grimsley, G. J. (eds.), Early Eocene vertebrates and plants from the Fisher/Sullivan site (Nanjemoy Formation) Stafford County, Virginia. Virginia Division of Mineral Resources, publication 152, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
West, R. M. 1973. Geology and mammalian paleontology of the New Fork-Big Sandy area, Sublette County, Wyoming. Fieldiana Geology, 29: 1–193.Google Scholar
Wible, J. R. 2008. On the cranial osteology of the Hispaniolan solenodon, Solenodon paradoxus Brandt, 1833 (Mammalia, Lipotyphla, Solenodontidae). Annals of Carnegie Museum, 77: 321–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar