Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:34:37.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new fossil bristle worm (Annelida: Polychaeta: Aphroditiformia) from the late Cretaceous of tropical America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Javier Luque
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada 〈[email protected] Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa-Ancón 0843–03092, Panamá, Panamá
Stéphane Hourdez
Affiliation:
CNRS, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29682 Roscoff, France Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29682 Roscoff, France 〈hourdez@sb–roscoff.fr〉
Olev Vinn
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, Tartu 50411, Estonia 〈[email protected]

Abstract

A new species of aphroditiform polychaete, Protopholoe colombiana, is described from the Coniacian of Colombia, South America, increasing the number of species of this genus known from the fossil record to two. This is the first occurrence of fossil soft-bodied polychaetes in the Tropical Americas, and indicates that aphroditiforms were spread worldwide during the Mesozoic.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alessandrello, A., 1990, Palaeoaphrodite anaboranoensis n. sp., a new species of polychaete annelid from the lower Trias of Madagascar: Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, v. 131, p. 205208.Google Scholar
Alessandrello, A., Bracchi, G., and Riou, B., 2004, Polychaete, Sipunculan and Enteropneust worms from the lower Callovian (Middle Jurassic) of La Voulte-Sur-Rhône (Ardèche, France): Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale de Milano, v. 32, p. 116.Google Scholar
Alessandrello, A., and Teruzzi, G., 1986, Paleoaphrodite raetica n. gen. n. sp., a new fossil polychaete annelid of the Rhaetic of Lombardy: Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, v. 127, p. 297300.Google Scholar
Bracchi, G., and Alessandrello, A., 2005, Paleodiversity of the free-living polychaetes (Annelida, Polychaeta) and description of new taxa from the Upper Cretaceous Lagerstätten of Haqel, Hadjula and Al-Namoura: Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale de Milano, v. 32, no. 3, p. 164.Google Scholar
Briggs, D.E.G., and Bartels, C., 2010, Annelids from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate (Lower Emsian, Rhenish Massif, Germany): Palaeontology, v. 53, p. 215232.Google Scholar
Briggs, D.E.G., and Kear, A.J., 1993, Decay and preservation of polychaetes: taphonomic thresholds in soft-bodied organisms: Paleobiology, v. 19, p. 107135.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S., 1979, Middle Cambrian polychaetes from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, v. 285, p. 227274.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Grazhdankin, D., 2005, Enigmatic worm-like organisms from the Upper Devonian of New York: an apparent example of Ediacaran-like preservation: Palaeontology, v. 48, p. 395410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, R.P., 1962, The polychaete stomodeum and the interrelationships of the families of Polychaeta: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 139, p. 389428.Google Scholar
D’Orbigny, A.D., 1850, Prodrome de Paléontologie Stratigraphique Universelle des Animaux Mollusques & Rayonnés, v. 2, Paris, V. Masson, 428 p.Google Scholar
Eibye-Jacobsen, D., 2004, A reevaluation of Wiwaxia and the polychaetes of the Burgess Shale: Lethaia, v. 37, p. 317335.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M., and Bergman, C.F., 2003, Late Ordovician polychaete faunas of the type Cincinnatian region, U.S.A: Journal of Paleontology, v. 77, p. 509523.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, K., Sroka, S., Kruty, M.D., and Henderson, A.A., 1997, Polychaete worms, in Shabica, C.W., and Hay A.A., eds., Richardson’s Guide to the Fossil Fauna of Mazon Creek: Chicago, Northeastern Illinois University, p. 6483.Google Scholar
Glasby, C.J., Hutchings, P.A., Fauchald, K., Paxton, H., Rouse, G.W., Russell, C.W., and Wilson, R.S., 2000, Class Polychaeta, in Beesley, P.L., Ross, G.J.B., and Glasby, C.J., eds., Polychaetes and allies: the southern synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Vol. 4A Polychaeta, Myzostomida, Pogonophora, Echiura, Sipuncula, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, p. 1296.Google Scholar
Grube, A.E., 1850, Die Familien der Anneliden: Archiv für Naturgeschichte, v. 16, Berlin, Springer, p. 249364.Google Scholar
Johnston, G., 1839, Miscellanea zoologica. VI. The British Aphroditaceae: Annals of Natural History; or, Magazine of Zoology, Botany, and Geology, v. 2, p. 424441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, W.J., 1984, Systematic palaeontology and stratigraphic distribution of the ammonite faunas of the French Coniacian: Special Papers in Palaeontology, v. 31, 160 p., 133 pls.Google Scholar
Levinsen, G.M.R., 1882, Systematisk-geografisk oversigt over de nordiske Annulata, Gephyrea, Chaetognathi og Balanoglossi. 1. Hälfte: Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening i Köbenhavn, p. 160251.Google Scholar
Malmgren, A.J., 1867, Annulata Polychaeta; Spetsbergiæ, Groenlandiæ, Islandiæ et Scandinaviæ. Hactenus cognita, cum XIV tabulis: Ex Officina Frenckelliana, Helsingfors, 127 p.Google Scholar
Norlinder, E., Nygren, A., Wiklund, H., and Pleijel, F., 2012, Phylogeny of scale-worms (Aphroditiformia, Annelida), assessed from 18SrRNA, 28SrRNA, 16SrRNA, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), and morphology: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 65, p. 490500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyment, R.A., 1958, Über einige Ammoniten aus Coniac Kolumbiens und Venezuelas, Südamerika: Stockholm Contributions in Geology, v. 2, p. 125.Google Scholar
Sars, M., 1835, Beskrivelser og iagttagelser over nogle mærkelige eller nye i Havet ved den Bergenske Kyst levende Dyr af Polypernes, Acalephernes, Radiaternes, Annelidernes, og Molluskernes classer, med en kort Oversigt over de hidtil af Forfatteren sammesteds fundne Arter og deres Forekommen: Bergen, Norway, Thorstein Hallager, 81 p.Google Scholar
Schlüter, C.A., 1867, Beitrag zur Kenntniss der jüngsten Ammoneen Norddeutschlands: Bonn, Germany, A. Henry, 46 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seilacher, A., 2007, Trace Fossil Analysis: Berlin, Springer, 226 p.Google Scholar
Van Straelen, V., 1936, Crustacés Décapodes nouveaux ou peu connus de l’époque Crétacique: Bulletin du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, v. 12, no. 45, p. 149.Google Scholar
Vinn, O., and Luque, J., 2013, First record of a pectinariid-like (Polychaeta, Annelida) agglutinated worm tube from the Late Cretaceous of Colombia: Cretaceous Research, v. 41, p. 107110.Google Scholar
Vinn, O., and Mutvei, H., 2009, Calcareous tubeworms of the Phanerozoic: Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 58, p. 286296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinther, J., Van Roy, P., and Briggs, D.E.G., 2008, Machaeridians are Palaeozoic armoured annelids: Nature, v. 451, no. 7175, p. 185188.Google Scholar
Walaszczyk, I., and Cobban, W.A., 2006, Palaeontology and biostratigraphy of the middle–upper Coniacian and Santonian inoceramids of the US Western Interior: Acta Geologica Polonica, v. 56, p. 241348.Google Scholar
Walaszczyk, I., and Cobban, W.A., 2007, Inoceramid fauna and biostratigraphy of the upper middle Coniacian–lower middle Santonian of the Pueblo Section (SE Colorado, US Western Interior): Cretaceous Research, v. 28, p. 132142.Google Scholar
Wiklund, H., Nygren, A., Pleijel, F., and Sundberg, P., 2005, Phylogeny of Aphroditiformia (Polychaeta) based on molecular and morphological data: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 37, p. 494502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, H.S., Nowlan, G.S., Barnes, C.R., and Batten, R.S.R., 1999, The Ledge Section at Cow Head, western Newfoundland as a GSSP candidate for the lower boundary of the second stage of the Ordovician System: new data and discussion of the graptolite, conodont and chitinozoan assemblages: A Report to the IUGS/ICS Subcommission on Ordovician Stratigraphy, p. 130.Google Scholar